• Login
  • Register
  • PRO
    • PRO Compliance plan
    • PRO Compliance
    • PRO subscription plans
    • Curated articles
    • In-depth
    • Market intelligence
    • Practice guides
    • PRO Reports New
    • Lexology GTDT
    • Ask Lexy
  • PRO
  • Latest
  • GTDT
  • Research
  • Learn
  • Experts
  • Store
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Influencers
  • About
  • Explore
  • Legal Research
  • Primary SourcesBeta
  • PRO Compliance

Introducing PRO Compliance
The essential resource for in-house professionals

  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides
Getting The Deal Through joins Lexology
GTDT and Lexology Navigator have merged

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics New
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons Beta
  • Ideation

CLIENT INTELLIGENCE

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates New
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre New

COMPETITOR INTELLIGENCE

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates New

Lexology PRO

Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 

PRO Compliance plan
PRO subscription plans

Premium content

  • Curated articles
  • In-depth
  • Market intelligence
  • Practice guides
  • PRO Reports New

Analysis tools

  • Lexology GTDT
  • Ask Lexy
Explore all PRO content PRO Compliance
  • Find experts
  • About
  • Firms
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

Millésime win for Bordeaux wines producers

HFG Law & Intellectual Property

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

China September 25 2018

On last July, in a landmark decision, the Shandong Penglai Court ruled in favor of the Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux (hereinafter referred as “CIVB”) in a criminal case for trademark counterfeiting by sentencing the counterfeiters to two years in jail.

Even if the scope of the fake wine operation and the volume of the counterfeiting seized are still unknown, this successful decision is the latest achievements in Bordeaux’s battle against Chinese wine counterfeiters, which follows years of wider international intellectual property disputes.

The Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux (CIVB) is a French interest group representing nearly 7,000 Bordeaux wine producers and growers from 400 wineries. One of the association's main aims is to defend the prestige of Bordeaux wines in France and abroad against wine counterfeiters selling fake editions of some of the region’s most prized chateaux.

The win came shortly after the council's other legal victory in Shanghai last December, where three counterfeiters were convicted and fined for a combined total of more than RMB 1 million (US$145,000), the first criminal conviction on a collective GI.

The case involved a wine dealer selling counterfeit Bordeaux wines worth approximately RMB 5 million which is far beyond the threshold for counterfeiting registered trademarks.

The legal representative and his employee have been sentenced to three years in jail by the Xuhui District Court of Shanghai.

 

On July 14th, 2012, the CIVB registered with the China Trademark Office (CTMO) the geographical indication “BORDEAUX波尔多” (ie, Bordeaux in Latin and Chinese characters) No.10474883 as collective trademark, designating wines in class 33. The recognition of “geographical indication” in China (commonly indicated as “GI”) was granted to the CIVB in 2015 by the AQSIQ.

It is worth to highlight that according to Chinese laws and regulations in force a Geographical Indication can be protected under three different regimes governed by different authorities: Ministry of Agriculture; State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection & Quarantine (AQSIQ) and Chinese Trademark Office (CTMO).

Under Chinese Trademark Law, GIs can be registered as certification or collective marks, and the GIs granted for trademark registration could enjoy protection against infringement and counterfeiting with the efficient system implemented for trademarks.

Collective trademark is defined as “a trademark or service mark owned by a collective (cooperative, association or any other collective group), whose members use the collective mark to identify their goods and services, to indicate their membership to the group and thus distinguish their goods and services from the non-members”. Pursuant to this definition, any authorized use of a collective trademark by a non-member shall be considered as trademark infringement.

The first civil case where the GI collective trademark “BORDEAUX波尔多” was granted judicial protection in China dated on 2014. In this decision, the Court held that the use of “BORDEAUX” on the cap and front label of the wine product to serve as a source identifier falls under the definition of trademark use.

However, the defendant Hunan Margaux Trading Co, Ltd was not a member of the CIVB and the trademarks “玛歌堡” (i.e. Margaux Castle) and “BORDEAUX” printed on the front label are similar with the registered collective trademarks, the sale of the infringing wine was deemed as trademark infringement.

The Changsha Intermediate Court issued a court injunction awarding the CIVB for damages of RMB 150,000.

In this way, it is strongly recommended to proceed with the registration of the GIas trademark as soon as practical. A GI can be a geographic name (e.g.“Roquefort” blue cheese), a symbol or logo (e.g. a picture of the Leaning Tower of Pisa), the outline of a geographic area (e.g. a map of Paris), or anything else that genuinely identifies a product with a source region, exception made to the name or sign referring to a national flag or emblem which are considering as an absolute ground of refusal in China.

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • China
  • Litigation
  • Trademarks
  • HFG Law & Intellectual Property

Tagged with

  • Trademark infringement
  • Geographical indication

Popular articles from this firm

  1. The long history (made short) of women lawyers *
  2. Parallelimport:thebattlebetweensafeandcheap *
  3. The war of Louis Vuitton against fake bags *
  4. Hosting the website in Mainland China: the ICP license *
  5. Can a Company force an employee to get Covid-19 vaccine? *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology
loading...

Related research hubs

  • China
  • Litigation
  • Trademarks
Peter Rosenbloom
Labor & Employment Counsel
The Boeing Company
What our clients say

"The newsfeeds are extremely relevant. They address both legislative and judicial updates and offer an experienced, thoughtful analysis of directions or trends. The articles are all extremely well done and provide a practical viewpoint, not just an academic one. Most topics have at least 3-5 articles from various law firms, so there's an opportunity to read different perspectives and analyses."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Law Business Research

© Copyright 2006 - 2021 Law Business Research