General legal framework

Legal definition of ‘gambling’

What are the legal elements required for an activity to be regarded as gambling?

In order for an activity to be regarded as gambling under Australian law, the activity must generally involve all of the following elements:

  • the staking of money or any other provision of consideration of real-world value (the consideration element);
  • the outcome of an event determined by an element of chance or mixed chance and skill (the chance element); and
  • the purpose of winning a prize (the prize element).

If an activity does not involve one or more of the above elements, it is unlikely to be considered gambling. However, in some cases, it is unclear if a particular type of activity falls within the scope of this definition. This issue often arises in relation to social games. For example, it is unclear under Australian law if:

  • in-game purchases offered in the course of free-to-play games satisfy the consideration element; and
  • additional play prizes, and other prizes that do not have real-world value, satisfy the prize element.
Remote activity

With respect to remote or other cross-border activity, where is the wager deemed to take place?

Australia is a federation in which legislative power is divided between the federal government and the eight states and territories. Each state and territory retains the power to make laws regulating gambling conducted within its jurisdiction. However, under the Australian Constitution, which provides for the freedom of interstate trade, gambling operators that offer online services under a licence issued in one jurisdiction are permitted to offer their services to customers in other states and territories.

In relation to cross-border gambling in Australia, a bet will be considered to have been made in the jurisdiction in which it was received and processed by the gambling operator. For example, a bet placed by a person in South Australia will be deemed to have taken place in the Northern Territory if it is received and processed by a bookmaker in the Northern Territory. This principle was upheld by the Federal Court in The State of Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 143. For some purposes, the location of the consumer will also be relevant (eg, in order to calculate the point of consumption taxes payable by a gambling operator).

However, under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA), which is the federal legislation that governs the provision of offshore gambling services to Australian residents, gambling services will be deemed to be provided to Australian customers where there is an Australian customer link – that is, where a service is provided to a person located in Australia.

Age restrictions

What is the minimum age for participating in lawful gambling?

The minimum age for lawful participation in gambling activities, including opening an account with a gambling operator, placing a bet with a gambling operator, placing a bet in a licensed venue and being employed by a gambling operator, is 18 years.


What are the penalties for offering unlawful gambling?

Penalties for offering, providing or facilitating the provision of unlawful gambling services vary between the states and territories, and depend upon the seriousness of the offence. It is outside the scope of this chapter to outline the complete framework of liability for the various offences that exist under Australian law, however, generally, penalties are much lower for contravention of the state and territory laws than under the federal law, ie, the IGA.

Penalties for contravention of the IGA are significant: for an individual up to 5,000 penalty units per day for a criminal offence (equivalent to A$1.05 million) or up to five times that for a corporation (equivalent to A$5.25 million) and, for an individual, up to 7,500 penalty units per day for a civil offence (equivalent to A$1.575 million) or up to five times that for a corporation (equivalent to A$7.875 million). Liability for an offence under the IGA may also be extended to, for example, directors and officers, agents, and business-to-business service providers.

Does the law penalise the gambler directly for participating in unlawful gambling?

At the state and territory level, liability is generally placed on the person or company providing the gambling service, rather than on the customer for participating in the relevant services. In limited circumstances, liability will be placed on the individual; however, from a policy perspective, we consider that it is unlikely that a regulatory authority would prosecute an individual under these provisions.

Social and non-profit gambling

Are there exceptions for social gambling, or charitable or non-profit gambling?

Gambling will be unlawful unless provided under a licence issued by an Australian regulatory authority. However, exceptions from the requirement to obtain a gambling licence are provided for in most states and territories for specified activities (eg, raffles, bingo, football tipping, sweeps and lucky envelopes), where those activities are conducted for fundraising purposes (eg, to benefit the community or charity) in accordance with a permit issued by the relevant regulatory authority.

Free-play games of chance for the promotion of trade, known as trade promotions, are also permitted, provided that certain conditions are met. With reference to social gambling, see ‘Regulation’.

Regulatory authorities

What entity regulates land-based and remote gambling, and what are the regulator’s powers?

The key regulators in each jurisdiction are:

  • New South Wales (NSW) – Liquor & Gaming New South Wales, and the Independent Liquor & Gaming Authority;
  • Victoria – the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation, and the Department of Justice and Regulation;
  • Australian Capital Territory – the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission;
  • Northern Territory – the Northern Territory Racing Commission;
  • Western Australia – the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor;
  • South Australia – Consumer and Business Services;
  • Tasmania – the Liquor and Gaming Commission;
  • Queensland – the Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation; and
  • Australia-wide – the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).

Each of the state and territory regulators is responsible for granting licences under, ensuring compliance with, and enforcing, legislation prohibiting certain unlawful gambling activities. In some jurisdictions, a different regulator to those listed above is responsible for the regulation of casinos, or the regulation of charitable or community gaming and trade promotions.

There are also situations where agreement is reached between the federal government and the state and territory governments for the implementation of regulatory measures in all the states and territories. A recent example is the implementation of the National Consumer Protection Framework (NCPF) whereby the federal government and all eight states and territories agreed to introduce into their legislative structure, over a period of 18 months commencing from November 2018, 10 mandatory consumer protection measures applicable to online wagering operators. The 10 measures in the NCPF are a minimum standard and the individual states and territories may introduce further or more onerous measures.

Anti-money-laundering regulations

Are gambling licensees considered financial institutions for purposes of anti-money-laundering and similar financial services regulatory requirements or are they otherwise subject to such requirements?

Gambling licensees are not considered to be financial institutions; however, the provision of gambling services is deemed to be a designated service to which federal anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) laws apply. Under AML/CTF legislation, gambling operators are required to, for example:

  • verify the identity, and conduct ongoing due diligence of all customers who open an account with the gambling operator;
  • develop, update, maintain, and enforce an AML/CTF programme that outlines the measures that the gambling operator will take to identify and mitigate AML/CTF risks;
  • report regularly to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC); and
  • keep detailed records of all customer transactions, fund transfers, identification procedures, and due diligence assessments.

Significant penalties apply for a failure to comply with AML/CTF laws (see ‘Recent cases’).

Land-based gambling


What types of land-based gambling are permitted in your jurisdiction, and is gambling regulated at a national or subnational level?

Land-based gambling is regulated at the state and territory levels. Permitted forms of land-based gaming include wagering (including totalisator betting), lotteries, casino gaming and gaming machines (known as poker machines).

Only licensed casinos are permitted to provide table gaming services. The principal licensed casino operators are:

  • The Star Entertainment Group Limited, which operates casinos in Sydney and in South East Queensland; and
  • Crown Resorts Limited, which operates casinos in Melbourne and Perth (and in Sydney it is scheduled for completion by 2024).

Licensed venue operators, including casinos, pubs and clubs, are permitted to operate poker machines, although the regulatory authorities limit the number of machines in circulation at any given time. In Western Australia, poker machines are only permitted in casinos.

Historically, government-owned entities were the sole providers of retail wagering and lottery services. However, these entities have been privatised in all states and territories except Western Australia (however, the totalisator is in the process of being sold to the private sector). Tabcorp Group, a publicly listed company that merged with its principal competitor (Tatts Group) in 2017, holds exclusive licences for the provision of these services in most states and territories.

Establishment licensing

Please describe the licensing criteria to operate land-based gambling of each type or classification. Does your jurisdiction limit the number of available licences?

The licensing process for operators of land-based gambling activities varies greatly depending on the jurisdiction in which the services are being offered and the type of services being offered.

For example, in New South Wales (NSW), a liquor licence issued to a pub or club will specify the maximum number of poker machines that are permitted to be operated in the venue. In order to own and operate a poker machine, a liquor licensee must obtain a Gaming Machine Entitlement (GME) or Poker Machine Permit (PMP). The number of GMEs and PMPs are limited by the NSW regulator. However, pubs and clubs can negotiate the purchase or use of a GME or PMP from an existing permit holder (or through a broker). Any such arrangement must be approved by the NSW regulator.

As outlined under ‘Types', land-based wagering services and lotteries are conducted under long-term exclusive licensing arrangements in each state and territory. Historically, only a limited number of casino licences were granted in each jurisdiction, however, in recent years, a number of new licences have been the subject of a tender process in Queensland. The licensing process for casino operators is particularly onerous. Prior to licensing, applicants for the licence will generally be required to undergo a lengthy and competitive tender process, during which they will be required to provide evidence of, for example, their suitability, financial position, the impact of the proposed casino on tourism, employment and economic development, and expertise in the provision of gambling services.

Director, officer and owner licensing

Must individual directors, officers or owners of licensees also be licensed or reviewed for suitability?

Generally, the regulatory and licensing authority in each jurisdiction will require any person who is associated or connected with a gambling operation to be investigated to determine his or her suitability. The investigation is commonly referred to as ‘probity’.

Whether a person is sufficiently associated or connected with the gambling operation is usually at the discretion of the authority and may include an investigation of directors, officers, employees, and any person or company with a direct or indirect ownership interest (in some cases, as low as 5 per cent). In some instances, employees or persons involved in the day-to-day operation of the company will need to undergo a separate licensing process (eg, as a key employee).

Probity investigations can be onerous and will usually require the person or company being investigated to disclose sensitive information, including in relation to litigious matters and, in some cases, complete financial records including a current statement of assets and liabilities.


May a gambling location be part of a resort, restaurant or other multi-purpose location? What limitations apply?

Land-based gambling activities are usually offered in conjunction with the provision of other services. For example, a casino is usually only one part of a larger resort that provides hotel and/or residential accommodation, restaurants, and shopping facilities. The integration of these services is limited by the requirement to restrict gambling activities to designated areas. Among other limitations, access to designated areas must be limited to persons over 18, the service of food and alcohol is not permitted, and responsible gambling warning messages must be displayed at all times. Similar restrictions apply to retail betting shops.

Casino development

What considerations arise in developing a casino resort project that are not typical to other resort development?

Approval for the development of a major new resort that includes a casino may be granted in one of two ways, namely:

  • the relevant state or territory government will announce their intention to rezone or pass relevant laws in order to allow a site to be developed as a resort. In some cases, the government will propose that a casino licence be included in the package awarded to the party that is successful at the end of the tender process. This may also be the subject of negotiations between the government and private parties, and will generally determine the type of applicants that will tender for the opportunity to be granted the rights over the development. An example of this is the Queensland government’s proposed Global Tourism Hub development concept, an integrated resort plan first announced in October 2017; or
  • a private operator may approach the government with a proposal for a casino resort development. This process will usually involve an extensive period of lobbying and negotiation, and will generally require the proposal to show significant financial and community benefit (eg, see the Crown Casino development at Barangaroo in Sydney, NSW).

In either instance (and both are very rare), a casino licence will generally only be granted following an extensive period of public consultation, as well as significant debate (in Parliament and elsewhere). Generally, the standard of proof of the community and economic benefits is significantly higher for the approval of a casino licence than a non-casino resort development. In approving a casino licence, state and territory governments will also consider the weight of public opinion as well as other matters outlined in ‘Establishment licensing’.

Passive/institutional ownership

Are there provisions for passive or institutional ownership that allow for exemption or modification of licensing requirements?

The relevant legislation does not provide for a passive or institutional owner to be excluded from applicable licensing requirements. However, in practice, institutional investors may be subject to a lower probity threshold on the basis that they do not have an active role in the operation or management of the licensee.

Responsible gambling

What responsible gambling obligations apply to licensees?

The responsible gambling obligations that apply to a supplier of land-based gambling services vary, depending on the licensing jurisdiction, the conditions attached to the licence, and the type of services being provided. Generally, gambling service providers will be required to provide customers with:

  • the option to self-exclude from the services provided by the operator (this is done on an individual operator basis – no centralised system is currently in place, although a centralised system is proposed and will be implemented in relation to online wagering as part of the National Consumer Protection Framework);
  • options for imposing voluntary pre-commitment limits; and
  • information about responsible gambling support services.

Also, warning material must be displayed in the designated gambling area.


What type of tax and what tax rate applies to each form of lawful land-based gambling activity?

Gambling taxes vary greatly depending on the type of gambling service and the jurisdiction in which it is provided. Generally, specific taxes will be payable to the relevant regulatory body as a percentage of net or gross revenue. The tax applied may also be metered for fixed revenue brackets, or increase year on year under the licence conditions.

In addition to specific gambling taxes, operators will also be required to pay corporate taxes and goods and services tax (see ‘Remote gambling – Taxes’).

Remote gambling


Is remote gambling permitted and, if so, what types?

Under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA), there is a general prohibition on the supply and advertising of online gambling services to persons present in Australia, unless the service is a regulated interactive gambling service and a regulatory authority in an Australian jurisdiction licenses the gambling service provider.

Regulated interactive gambling services include online sports betting, wagering and lotteries. Online casino gaming, poker and other gaming services are generally prohibited in Australia. Lottery betting is also now prohibited in Australia after legislation making this type of betting activity illegal came into effect in January 2019. Generally, licensed operators may offer remote or online gambling services without any distinction between online platforms or devices (eg, mobile or tablets) on which the gambling service is offered to customers.


What are the criteria for obtaining a licence to operate remote gambling?

The criteria for obtaining a remote gambling licence will depend on the type of licence (and the type of gambling service to be provided) and the jurisdiction in which the licence is sought. For simplicity, we have focused on the criteria required to obtain a sports bookmaking licence.

Generally, in order to obtain a licence, applicants must be a corporate entity registered in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and must demonstrate financial viability and sustainability (of both the company and shareholders), provide a clear business plan for conducting business in Australia, and meet certain probity and suitability criteria to the satisfaction of the relevant licensing authority (see 'Director, officer and owner licensing').

How do the licensing criteria for remote gambling operators differ from those applicable to land-based operators?

Generally, the licensing criteria for remote gambling operators is the same as for land-based operators, although a higher burden of proof is generally expected of land-based gambling operators as a result of the exclusivity awarded.

Cross-border gambling

May operators located in other countries offer internet gambling to consumers in your jurisdiction without obtaining a licence there?

The IGA strictly prohibits the provision of any online or remote gambling services to residents in Australia unless the operator holds a licence to provide those services granted by a regulatory authority in an Australian jurisdiction. Any provision of ‘offshore’ internet gambling is an offence under the IGA.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), in November 2019, issued a statement confirming that blocking of illegal offshore online gambling operators providing services to persons located in Australia would be implemented. The ACMA has requested that Australian internet service providers block websites of offshore online gambling operators considered to be operating illegally in Australia. This measure has gone further than originally contemplated since, although it was meant to be implemented solely against offshore online wagering providers, it is now being applied to websites associated with illegal offshore online gambling providers. 

May operators licensed in your jurisdiction offer internet gambling to consumers in other countries?

The IGA contains a prohibition on the provision of online gambling services to residents in specified overseas jurisdictions. However, to date, no countries have been specified on this list of prohibited countries. As a matter of Australian law, Australian licensed operators can provide their services to consumers in other countries, but will need to consider the extent to which local laws may be applicable. For example, an Australian licensed operator would still need to obtain a remote gambling licence from the UK Gambling Commission if it offers its services to UK customers.


What tax rate applies to each form of remote gambling?

General Australian taxation requirements apply, including the requirement to pay corporate income tax (currently 30 per cent (but capable of reduction to 27.5 per cent for 2019–20, to 26 per cent for 2020–21, and thereafter to 25 per cent)), goods and services tax of 10 per cent on all sales, and payroll tax.

Remote gambling operators are also required to pay gambling taxes calculated as a percentage of revenue (as set out in the licence conditions and legislation, and enforced by the relevant licensing authority). In all states and territories, except for the Northern Territory, a point of consumption tax is payable by online wagering operators as a percentage of the gambling revenue derived from customers located in the specific jurisdiction.

Wagering operators accepting bets on sporting and racing events are also required to pay product fees charged by the relevant controlling bodies for the use of race field and sports fixture information.

Intellectual property


Are gambling games – land-based or remote – patentable in your jurisdiction?

In order for a gambling game to be a patentable invention, it must be sufficiently novel and inventive. A game that is simply a set of codified rules or processes conducted using an existing apparatus will not meet these criteria. However, if the invention relates to an improvement to the technical operation of gaming equipment, then that feature may be patentable.


Are there limitations on how brands, logos or other types of marks may be used in promoting gambling games?

Intellectual property rights, such as rights conferred by registered trademarks, may subsist in brands, logos, words and other marks used by gambling operators in Australia. These marks cannot be used in connection with the provision of certain categories of services for which a trademark has been used, except where permitted to do so by the rights holder.



What types of restrictions apply to advertising gambling games?

The advertising of gambling services, whether online or land-based, is regulated at the state and territory level, and the requirements vary greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Industry codes of practice also specify the manner in which gambling services can be advertised on various media platforms.

Generally, gambling advertising is prohibited or unlawful if it, among other things:

  • relates to a gambling service that is unlawful;
  • targets persons under 18 years old;
  • represents gambling as a means of financial betterment;
  • misrepresents the likelihood of winning;
  • depicts the consumption of alcohol; and/or
  • does not include the requisite responsible gambling messages.

Additional restrictions are placed on wagering operators in relation to, among other things, the:

  • advertising of live odds during sporting events;
  • promotion of gambling services on television and radio during peak times; and
  • offering of inducements to participate in wagering activities, or open a betting account, or refer a friend to open a betting account.

The restrictions have been further clarified by the National Consumer Protection Framework. Further requirements are also expected with the eventual implementation of the National Self-Exclusion Register, which will prohibit the provision of services and promotions to any person who requests to be excluded.

Federal laws, including the Australian Consumer Law and the Spam Act 2003 (Cth), also apply to the gambling operators advertising in Australia.



What types of suppliers to gambling operators require licences?

Most suppliers of goods and services to gambling operators are not required to hold a licence. For example, affiliates and odds comparison sites are not required to hold a licence from a state or territory licensing authority. The exception is for suppliers of services related to the sale, provision and maintenance of casino gaming and poker machine equipment. In some jurisdictions, legislation requires suppliers of these services to hold a licence, permit or other approval from the regulatory body in the state or territory in which the services are being provided. The relevant regulator generally has the power to conduct any enquiries of the supplier or their employees for the purpose of determining their suitability to hold the necessary licences, permits or other approvals.


If licensing is not required, is there a registration or other process suppliers are subject to, and what triggers that process?

Where suppliers are not required to be licensed, there may still be the requirement for certain agreements with third party service providers to be approved by the regulator. Legislation regulating casinos may require that the relevant regulator approve any agreement entered into between a supplier and the casino operator. These contracts are known as controlled contracts. Similar requirements extend to licensed bookmakers in relation to white-label arrangements.

Labour and employment

Wage and hour rules

Are there particular rules governing hours and wage treatment for casino employees?

There are no specific rules governing hours and wage treatment for casino employees. In Australia, casino employees are subject to the same labour laws that regulate other industries.

Collective labour

Must casino employees be members of labour unions or similar organisations?

It is not a requirement for casino employees to be members of labour unions or other similar organisations; however, they are not precluded from being members.

Acquisitions and changes of control

Change of control

How are licensee changes of control, and substantial changes in shareholdings of licensees, addressed?

Most licensing authorities retain the discretion, either under the relevant legislation or licence conditions, to require that a licensee discloses, and seeks approval of, any change in their direct or indirect ownership structure. These requirements apply regardless of whether the operator is a public or private company. However, in practice, regulatory authorities will ordinarily only conduct a full probity investigation into a shareholder that acquires an interest of more than either 5 per cent or 10 per cent of the issued shares directly or indirectly in the company.  


How are gambling licences treated in bankruptcy?

Generally, laws provide that a ground for suspension or cancellation of a gambling licence will arise in favour of the regulatory authority where a licensee:

  • fails to meet its financial commitments;
  • becomes bankrupt or compounds with creditors;
  • takes advantage of the laws in force for the time being relating to bankruptcy;
  • is the subject of a winding up, either voluntarily or pursuant to court order; and/or
  • appoints a liquidator or receiver.

Accordingly, a creditor will generally be unable to effectively secure a debt against a gambling operator’s licence. Regulatory authorities usually require that, as a condition of their licence, a licensee must implement measures to protect client funds in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy.



How are forms of ‘quasi-gambling’ regulated? Are any treated as ‘gambling’, and what triggers such treatment?

Certain forms of ‘quasi-gambling’ are regulated in Australia such as pay-to-play daily fantasy sports. Fantasy sports operators have existed in the Australian market for some time and were originally regulated as a form of trade promotion. More recently, they are treated by regulators as a form of sports bookmaking for which a licence is required.

Generally, social gaming and skill gaming are not considered to be ‘gambling’ on the basis that neither meets the general test of ‘gambling’ under Australian law (see ‘Legal definition of ‘gambling’’). This is on the basis that social gaming does not involve a prize element and/or a consideration element, and skill gaming does not involve a chance element. Recently, however, politicians have called for these types of products to be deemed as gambling to ensure that they are appropriately regulated and comply with harm minimisation standards applicable to gambling operators.

In 2018, there was an inquiry by the Australian Federal Senate into loot boxes and whether those features are to be considered as gambling and regulated accordingly. The inquiry did not reach a final conclusion; however, it did acknowledge that, where real-world currency is exchanged to purchase loot boxes and/or to buy or sell virtual items, this activity is close to a gambling activity. No further action was taken following the conclusion of this inquiry.


Does your jurisdiction license quasi-gambling operators?

Fantasy sports operators are regulated in Australia as a form of sports bookmaking and therefore must obtain a licence to provide their services in the country. For this reason, the licensing process is the same as the process to obtain an online sports bookmaking or wagering licence (see ‘Remote gambling: Licensing’).

Other ‘quasi-gaming’ activities which are considered non-gambling are explained in the previous question. Generally, they do not require a licence; however, it is recommended that a review of the applicable state and territory legislation is conducted prior to commencing operations. 

Other restrictions

Does your jurisdiction impose other restrictions on the conduct of quasi-gambling activity, including restrictions on advertising, age of participation, limitations on prizes, etc?

As licensed sports wagering operators, fantasy sports operators that provide pay-to-play services must comply with all relevant Australian gambling laws. Operators that provide non-gambling products, such as social games and skill games, must still comply with Australian laws and regulations relating to advertising, consumer protection, privacy, and taxation, but are not subject to gambling laws, which provide, for example, that all customers must be over the age of 18. However, operators that provide social casino games should consider age classification and parental warning requirements to ensure that consumers are aware that gambling-style elements are present in the social games and, therefore, that the games may only be suitable for consumers over a certain age.


Recent cases

What, if any, significant litigation involving the gambling or quasi-gambling sectors has your jurisdiction seen in recent years?

In recent years, Australian courts have considered many cases with implications for the Australian gambling sector.

In 2015, Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) filed an action in the Federal Court against three Tabcorp Group companies for ‘extensive, significant and systemic non-compliance’ with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) law. In March 2017, the Federal Court approved a settlement agreement under which Tabcorp agreed to pay to AUSTRAC a A$45 million penalty (and costs) for contravention of AML/CTF law. Consequences for the industry are significant, with many operators investing heavily in reviewing their compliance systems and procedures.

In February 2018, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed the application that Aristocrat’s Dolphin Treasure electronic gaming machine (EGM) gave rise to misleading and deceptive representations in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law. The applicant, an individual, argued that features of the EGM gave rise to an inaccurate representation of the likelihood and value of the return that the player could expect from the machine. Despite the Court’s finding, it is likely that EGM suppliers, operators and regulatory authorities will continue to come under scrutiny from anti-gambling activists and the media.

The judgement of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (NSW) in Lottoland v ACMA was a key decision for the online gambling sector. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) considered that Lottoland could not provide a number of its products because they were deemed to be prohibited interactive gambling services under the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA). Lottoland disagreed with the ACMA's interpretation of the IGA and submitted an application to the Supreme Court to seek a declaration that the products were not a prohibited interactive gambling service under the IGA. The Supreme Court's decision, given on 26 July 2019, disagreed with the ACMA’s interpretation, and concluded that Lottoland could continue to provide legally these betting products in Australia under its licence. This decision provides clarity on the interpretation of prohibitions under the IGA relating to online gambling services.  

There has been continued enforcement of wagering advertising restrictions under which prosecutions have been brought successfully against Australian wagering licensees. Fines varying from A$2,500 to A$20,000 have been imposed by the courts, and, earlier this year, a fine of A$207,500 was imposed in NSW for offering gambling inducements. 

Update and trends

Key developments of the past year

Highlight any noteworthy developments or trends in the gambling or quasi-gambling sectors (legal or business) and their potential implications.

The decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (NSW) in Lottoland v ACMA is a key judgement in relation to the legality of online gambling services (see ‘Recent cases’).

The NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority has established an inquiry, under the Casino Control Act 1992, to investigate the suitability of Crown Casino to continue to hold its Barangaroo Casino Licence; to investigate the suitability of its associates, including Melco Resorts (a Hong Kong-based company that operates casinos) which had acquired just under 10 per cent in Crown Resorts; and to make recommendations relating to the current NSW casino regulatory framework. This inquiry follows allegations made against Crown Casino of money-laundering, and possible links to organised crime through arrangements with junket operators. The inquiry is being conducted by a former Supreme Court Judge. This inquiry is expected to make an in-depth analysis of the casino regulatory framework in NSW and the method in which casino operators conduct their business; and result in recommendations of changes which could affect not only casino regulation in NSW but throughout Australia.