Use the Lexology Getting the Deal Through tool to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.


Healthcare funding

In general terms, how is healthcare, including access to medicines and medical devices, funded in your jurisdiction? Outline the roles of the public and private sectors.

In Portugal, healthcare services are mostly provided by the Portuguese National Healthcare Service (NHS), which is funded by the state. As a result, healthcare services are predominantly administered by public hospitals, units and services. Specific healthcare services provided by NHS units are subject to the payment of user charges. However, users may be exempted from such payments in the case of economic insufficiency or of clinical conditions of high health risk.

Healthcare services may also be provided by private healthcare entities and entities of a social nature. The majority of private healthcare services are funded through private insurance policies.

Medicines and medical devices may be funded by the state under specific legal requirements and may attract full or partial funding.


In general terms, how is healthcare delivered in your jurisdiction? Outline the roles of the public and private sectors.

Healthcare is delivered through the NHS institutions that are under the authority of the Ministry of Health, such as health centre groups, hospitals and local health units. The NHS comprises primary, continued and hospital care.

Healthcare is also provided by private healthcare units and hospitals and healthcare units of a social nature.

The regulation, planning, financing, guidance, monitoring, evaluation, auditing and inspection of the NHS and the regulation, inspection and supervision of the healthcare activities and services rendered by private concerns and respective healthcare professionals is carried out by the State Secretariat of the Ministry of Health, whose respective services and bodies are under its direct and indirect administration.

Each of the Autonomous Regions of Madeira and Azores have specific healthcare regional systems and services frameworks, in accordance with specific regional legislation on organisation and operation of healthcare services.

The role of public and private sectors is the provision of primary, continued and hospital healthcare services in the areas of the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases and continuous care.

Key legislation

Identify the key legislation governing the delivery of healthcare and establishing the regulatory framework.

The key Portuguese legislation governing the delivery of healthcare is:

  • Law No. 56/79 of 15 September 1979, as amended, establishing the NHS by means of which the state secures citizens the constitutional right to health protection through general and tending-towards-free health services;
  • Law No. 48/90 of 24 August, as amended, the Health General Law, approves the legal bases on which the protection of health is to be executed;
  • Decree Law No. 11/93 of 15 January 1993, approving the NHS Statute;
  • Decree Law No. 124/2011 of 29 December 2011, the Ministry of Health Organic Law; and
  • Decree Law No. 126/2014, 22 August 2014, approving the Portuguese Healthcare Regulatory Authority Statute.

Responsible agencies

Which agencies are principally responsible for the enforcement of laws and rules applicable to the delivery of healthcare?

The Portuguese Healthcare Regulatory Authority (ERS) is the independent public body responsible for the supervision and regulation of the activity of public, private and social healthcare units (excluding pharmacies), and for the registeration of healthcare providers and issuance of the healthcare units’ licences to operate. The ERS is funded by a grant from the national budget and by its own revenue, of which 40 per cent is from fines and other pecuniary sanctions arising from the breaches and offences enforced by the ERS.

The General Inspectorate of Health Activities (IGAS) is a central service under the direct administration of the state, responsible for public law enforcement and compliance in all areas of healthcare provision. The IGAS is funded by the state budget and by its own resources, such as the revenue from fines collected in administrative offence proceedings, among others, in the proportion attributed by the specific laws under enforcement by the IGAS.

The General Health Directorate (DGS) is a central service under the direct administration of the state, funded by the state budget and by its own resources, such as the revenue from fines collected as a result of administrative misdemeanour proceedings in the proportion attributed by the specific laws regarding enforcement by the DGS. The DGS designs and coordinates health promotion and disease prevention activities, defines the technical conditions for the adequate provision of healthcare, programmes the national policy for the quality of the health system, secures the development and implementation of the National Health Plan and also coordinates the international relations of the Ministry of Health.

Scope of enforcement

What is the scope of their enforcement and regulatory responsibilities?

The ERS regulates the activity of healthcare facilities located in Portuguese mainland territory, of public, private or social ownership, regardless of whether it is of an individual or a collective nature (except pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies). ERS enforcement and regulatory activities include:

  • the registration of healthcare service providers;
  • the handling of complaints from service users, service providers and institutions;
  • executing spot inspections and audits of healthcare provider facilities;
  • investigating situations that have a significant adverse impact on patients’ rights or on the quality and safety of care;
  • carrying out administrative offence procedures involving healthcare providers and applying resulting sanctions; and
  • studying the healthcare system organisation, including providing instructions, advice updates and recommendations.

The IGAS enforces compliance by the Ministry of Health bodies and services under its control, and by public and private entities or entities of social nature to the applicable law. The IGAS’s main activities include:

  • executing of inspections and audits;
  • initiating and deciding on disciplinary proceedings and administrative offences;
  • providing public awareness campaigns, information and training programmes; and
  • issuing opinions and non-binding recommendations.

The main scope of the DGS’s activity is as follows:

  • coordinating and developing health plans and programmes;
  • coordinating and assuring epidemiological surveillance;
  • analysing and disclosing health information;
  • regulating and assuring health quality;
  • managing public health emergencies;
  • supporting the implementation of National Health Authority capabilities;
  • coordinating the Ministry of Health’s European Union and international activities;
  • monitoring the NHS care call centre; and
  • coordinating and monitoring the performance evaluation system of the Ministry of Health’s public administration.

Regulation of pharmaceutical products and medical devices

Which agencies are principally responsible for the regulation of pharmaceutical products and medical devices?

The National Authority of Medicines and Health Products IP (Infarmed) is a public institute under Ministry of Health auspices, funded by an annual grant from the state budget and also by its own resources, which include, among others, fees from commercial medicines, health products, cosmetics, personal hygiene products, medical devices and homeopathic pharmaceutical products, as well as from licences, fees and fines, in the percentage defined by law. Part of the amount of fines goes to Infarmed (eg, 40 per cent of fines for breaches to medicines legislation and 30 per cent of the fines arising from breaches of the medical devices rules).

Scope of enforcement

What is the scope of their enforcement and regulatory responsibilities?

Infarmed governs and supervises the sectors of medicines for human consumption and health products in accordance with public health protection standards and warrants the access of the health professionals and citizens to medicines and health products regarding quality, efficacy and safety. Among others, Infarmed is responsible for:

  • the licensing, certification, authorisation, entity approval (eg, pharma companies, distributors, pharmacies, manufactures and importers), regulatory activities and procedures;
  • medicines for human consumption;
  • medical devices and health products;
  • authorising clinical trials;
  • securing pharmacovigilance procedures for medicines and health products;
  • ruling on (and authorising) the prices of medicines subject to medical prescription or non-medical prescription (both reimbursable and nonreimbursable by the NHS);
  • conducting the reimbursement process of medicines and the previous evaluations procedure of medicines, medical devices and of health technologies and the acquisition of the same by NHS hospitals;
  • verifying the compliance with applicable laws on medicines and other health products; and
  • imposing fines in the case of infringement.

Infarmed may undertake inspections of the entities under its supervision.

Other agencies

Which other agencies have jurisdiction over healthcare, pharmaceutical and medical device cases?

The Portuguese Competition Authority under the National Competition Act (Law No. 19/2012, 8 May 2012) has public enforcement powers over healthcare, pharmaceutical and medical devices activities; including merger control, as well as over illegal agreements, abuse of dominance and abuse of economic dependency conducted by participants within the pharmaceutical industry. Applicable sanctions for illicit conduct include misdemeanour fines that can amount to 10 per cent of the infringer’s annual turnover.

The public prosecutor’s office, in accordance with its responsibilities, leads and directs criminal investigations over crimes committed by healthcare providers or pharmaceutical companies and respective legal representatives and employees.

Simultaneous investigations

Can multiple government agencies simultaneously conduct an investigation of the same subject? Does a completed investigation bar another agency from investigating the same facts and circumstances?

The same subject or facts may be investigated by different government agencies, because they might potentially constitute, for different reasons, a legal infringement under enforcement and supervision by several agencies. However, during simultaneous investigations, each agency is required to act and decide on the facts in accordance with the scope of its specific responsibilities and applicable law.

Regulation of pharmaceutical products and medical devices

Monitoring powers

What powers do the authorities have to monitor compliance with the rules on drugs and devices?

Infarmed has enforcement powers to inspect and supervise the actions of entities and their respective products, namely medicines for human consumption, medical devices and cosmetics, and clinical trials. The inspection and supervision activities may comprise of the manufacturing, import, distribution and dispensing to the public of the above-mentioned products. Infarmed’s inspection unit handles the inspection and supervision actions.

Entities such as manufacturers, market holders, wholesale distributors, public and private pharmaceutical services, pharmacies and entities authorised to sell medicines not subject to medical prescription are subject to inspection and supervision activities.

In addition, in the scope of medicine distribution, medicine authorisation processes and medical device distribution notification processes, warehouse inspections where the products are to be stored, or are already stored, are executed to verify the conformity of the premises with the legal requirements applicable to such products.

Investigation time frames

How long do investigations typically take from initiation to completion? How are investigations started?

The law does not foresee a specific time frame for investigations. As such, time frames depend on the scope of the investigation and the related facts. However, the investigation report is to be concluded by Infarmed inspectors 60 days following an inspection. The inspected entity has 10 days, beginning from the notification of the report, to submit its reply in writing. Infarmed subsequently assesses the inspectors’ report and the comments of the inspected entity, where it may issue an official report of administrative offence.

Furthermore, specifically in relation to the distribution activities of medicines and medical devices, and the notification discussed in question 10, such activities require an Infarmed inspection of the wholesale premises to be executed in a 30-day period, following document review submitted by the applicants. However, if changes are required to the premises, an additional 30-day period is applicable for the applicant to carry out the changes.

Access to investigation materials

What rights or access does the subject of an investigation have to the government investigation files and materials?

As discussed in question 11, entities under investigation have access to the Infarmed’s investigation report and its official report of administrative offence. In both cases, the defendant in the investigation is entitled to defence rights by means of comments to the investigators’ report and opposition to the official report of administrative offence. Following the issuing of Infarmed’s administrative offence final decision, defendants are entitled to challenge the decision before the competent administrative court.

Investigations abroad

If pharmaceutical products or medical devices are made in a foreign country, may the authorities conduct investigations of the manufacturing processes in that other country?

Infarmed may inspect, in conjunction with local authorities, facilities and establishments located in or outside the European Union, regarding the manufacturing of medicines, active substances or excipients, and also the laboratories committed to certain manufacturing phases or equipment authorised by Infarmed or used for the manufacturing purposes foreseen in the Portuguese Human Medicine Act (PMA) approved by Decree Law No. 176/2006, 30 August 2006, as amended.

In this regard, Infarmed may request directly, or through the European Commission or a local agency, that a manufacturer located in a third country is subject to an inspection.

Enforcement proceedings

Through what proceedings do agencies enforce the rules?

As highlighted in questions 10 to 13, Infarmed is entitled to handle investigations, supervision and administrative offence procedures to enforce the applicable law. Final decisions adopted by Infarmed can always be subject to judicial review.

The proceedings are ruled by administrative law because they are not of a civil or criminal nature.


What sanctions and other measures can the authorities impose or seek in enforcement actions against drug and device manufacturers and their distributors?

Besides the imposition of fines, Infarmed may also take decisions on the suspension, revocation or modification of the terms of a marketing authorisation or register of a medicine, or on its withdrawal from the market or prohibition on its dispense whenever the medicine in question does not comply with the applicable law and regulations or does not meet the conditions of the respective authorisation. Some contraventions are clarified in the PMA.

In the event of infringed legal provisions contained in the PMA, Infarmed can also impose violation fines and the following ancillary penalties:

  • the seizure of objects, equipment and illegal devices by the state;
  • a ban on a defaulter’s activities for a maximum two-year period;
  • a ban on a defaulter from participating in public tenders for a maximum two-year period; and
  • suspending authorisations, licences or other titles granting rights for a maximum two-year period.

In the event of breaching the PMA legal provisions on publicity requirements of medicines reimbursed by the NHS, besides the administrative offence proceeding determined by such infringement, additional sanctions can include the exclusion of such medicine from state reimbursement.

Regarding medical devices, Decree Law No. 145/2007 of 17 June 2007, as amended, which approves the Portuguese Medical Devices Act (PMDA), besides the imposition of fines, Infarmed may also impose corrective measures on breaches found in the course of an investigation and may also impose violation fines in the administrative offence procedure. Sentencing and fines owing to the violation of publicity and promotion law on medicines and medical devices may also be published online and on social media, as well as a two-year suspension of the publicity and promotional claims on the product.

Furthermore, breaching rules concerning medical sales representatives of medicines and medical devices visiting NHS healthcare units and services and respective health professionals, may lead to sales representatives and the respective market holder being banned from accessing all such units and services.

Actions against employees

Can the authorities pursue actions against employees as well as the company itself?

The PMA is clear on this issue. It foresees that individuals, legal entities (regardless the legality of incorporation), companies and associations without legal personality may be responsible for the administrative offences arising from the breach of the PMA’s legal provisions when the facts were executed by the respective bodies during the performance of their duties. The PMA also determines that the members of boards of directors of such entities may also be convicted by the sanction applicable to the entity, specially attenuated unless a more serious sanction is attributed by other legal provisions, when such natural person being or ought to have been aware of the infraction, did not adopt adequate measures to terminate the infringement immediately.

The PMA does not contain a similar provision as the one referred above. Therefore, as a rule, employees are excluded from Infarmed’s administrative offence proceedings. However, Infarmed may notify the relevant authorities and public prosecutor of the infringements committed by the entities’ employees.

Defences and appeals

What defences and appeals are available to drug and device company defendants in an enforcement action?

Defendants’ procedural and due-process rights are secured in accordance with the applicable legal provisions of the General Regime on Administrative Offences, approved by Decree Law No. 433/82, 14 September 1982, as amended.

Under this regime, no fines may be determined or applied by Infarmed without the defendant being assured that it had the opportunity to provide and state its views on the legal and factual reasoning on the alleged wrongful conduct and respective sanction.

From the outset, all decisions, dispatches and further measures adopted by Infarmed are mandatorily communicated to the infringers or defendants, and if such decisions and measures are likely to be challenged, Infarmed’s notification must contain the necessary information on legal acceptability, terms and challenging form before the courts under the dual-tier judicial system.

Hence, decisions and measures taken in the course of the administrative proceeding may be challenged by the defendants before the competent court. Defendants may also try to obtain the suspension of the enforcement of the administrative offence decisions taken by Infarmed by means of protective measure submitted to the competent court and subsequently challenge the decision before the same court. First instance court decisions are subject to appeal.

Minimising exposure

What strategies should companies adopt to minimise their exposure to enforcement actions and reduce their liability once an enforcement action is under way?

In our view, such strategies should be focused on preventive measures such as the definition and implementation of strict compliance procedures for critical topics, such as pharmacovigilance, clinical trials, publicity, relationships and interaction with health professionals, as well as training and updating of the employees on the applicable law, regulation and on compliance procedures.

While the enforcement action is under way, cooperation with agencies is a legal requirement in the investigation phase and is also recommended, acting as a mitigating factor in terms of applicable sanctions. Grounded substantiated evidence that compliance procedures are implemented in the company to secure conformity with the law, subject to a case-by-case analysis, can assist in mitigating applicable sanctions.

Recent enforcement activities

What have the authorities focused on in their recent drugs and devices enforcement activity and what sanctions have been imposed?

The main focus of Infarmed has been the supervision on pharmacovigilance and safety issues, publicity and promotional activity, the interaction of pharma companies with healthcare professionals and counterfeit medicines - the latter in conjunction with the Portuguese Tax and Customs Authority. Information on applied sanctions is not publicly released on the Infarmed website.

Self-governing bodies

Are there self-governing bodies for the companies that sell pharmaceutical products and medical devices? How do those organisations police members’ conduct?

The most relevant industry bodies are:

  • the Portuguese Pharmaceutical Industry Association (Apifarma); and
  • the Portuguese Association of Medical Devices Companies (Apormed).

Apifarma is ruled by two codes of ethics:

  • the code of ethics for promotional practices of the pharmaceutical industry and for the interactions with the healthcare professionals and institutions, organisations or healthcare professional associations; and
  • the code of conduct governing the relations between pharmaceutical industry and patient organisations.

The implementation and enforcement of the codes are entrusted to Apifarma’s council of ethics, which, in the instance of code violation, may ask the offender to immediately cease the violation or to promise in writing not to undertake such practices again. Violation of the codes’ provisions constitutes a disciplinary offence and may lead to disciplinary measures, such as:

  • a simple warning;
  • a reprimand;
  • a penalty up to the amount of five years’ membership fees;
  • a suspension of up to one year; and
  • expulsion.

Enforcement proceedings can be triggered by Apifarma approval or based on a complaint.

Apormed’s statute also includes disciplinary sanctions applicable to the respective members comparable to those provided in Apifarma’s codes.

Relationships between healthcare professionals and suppliers

Relationship rules

What are the rules prohibiting or controlling the financial relationships between healthcare professionals and suppliers of products and services?

Relevant rules are provided in article 158 of the PMA and in article 51 of the PDMA. Both provisions prohibit the giving or promise to give, directly or indirectly, awards, gifts, bonus or pecuniary or benefits in kind to healthcare professionals, except in cases where objects are of negligible value (eg, up to €60), that are cumulatively relevant for the health professional practice.

The above-mentioned benefits cannot be also granted to healthcare professionals’ patients, as determined by article 158 of the PMA.


How are the rules enforced?

The enforcement of rules may start with an investigation, and if an infringement of the above-mentioned rules is established, an administrative offence procedure may be initiated and fines may be imposed in accordance with articles 181 of the PMA and article 61 of the PMDA.

Reporting requirements

What are the reporting requirements on such financial relationships? Is the reported information publicly available?

Entities under the scope of the PMA are required, as set by respective article 159, to report to Infarmed in a 30-day period the granting of any benefit (eg, any advantage, value, payment, delivery of goods or granting of rights of pecuniary value, regardless the form of attribution, either as premium, subsidy, sponsorship, fees, subsidy or other), to any entity, legal person, individual, company, association (regardless of its nature or form), medical society of a scientific nature, clinical trials, patient organisations, NHS units and services and Ministry of Health services and bodies.

The PMDA foresees in respective article 52 the same reporting obligation to Infarmed, as described above.

Regulation of healthcare delivery

Authority powers

What powers do the authorities have to monitor compliance with the rules on delivery of healthcare?

The ERS, as supervising and regulatory authority of all healthcare units, has broad powers and is authorised to monitor compliance by the following:

  • to perform inspections and audits to healthcare providers’ facilities;
  • to handle investigations of situations of significant adverse impact on the rights of patients or on the quality and safety of care;
  • to handle complaints from service users, providers and institutions;
  • to conduct administrative offence procedures involving healthcare providers and applying sanctions; and
  • to produce studies, advice papers and recommendations.

The IGAS is entitled to audit, inspect, supervise and develop disciplinary action in the health sector, to secure compliance with the applicable law and ruling in every domain of healthcare services provision activity carried out by establishments or bodies of the Ministry of Health or those supervised by it, as well as by private entities, individuals or legal persons. Regarding private healthcare providers, the IGAS may carry out inspections on private and social healthcare units concerning additive dependency and behaviour. The IGAS is also committed to ensuring the prevention and detection of corruption and fraud, by promoting the adequate procedures.

Investigation time frames

How long do investigations of healthcare providers typically take from initiation to completion? How are investigations started?

There is no established legal time frame. The duration depends on the extent of the investigation, complexity, respective facts and related findings.

The investigation may start as a result of a complaint or as a consequence of an audit or inspection of the healthcare provider’s offices or health units. In the specific case of the ERS, inspections and audits may occur as a result of the execution of inspection plans previously approved and whenever circumstances indicate disturbances in the respective activity sector.

Access to investigation materials

What rights or access does the subject of an investigation have to the government investigation files and materials?

As a rule, no access to the inquiry file is granted until the end of investigation, although defence rights are secured by the applicable law, namely after the adoption of the terms to the infringement notice (see question 17).

During the investigation, the legal representatives of the investigated companies and respective employees are obliged to cooperate with the regulatory authorities (the ERS or the IGAS), notably by providing the requested information and documents in the terms defined by the authority, usually within a 30-day period.

Enforcement agencies

Through what proceedings do agencies enforce the rules?

National agencies can enforce the applicable rules by means of audits and inspections, and if circumstantial evidence of an infringement is found, administrative offence proceedings may be initiated to investigate such facts in depth. These proceedings are handled directly by the agencies and are not of civil or criminal nature.

Decisions adopted by the regulatory authorities are subject to judicial review before courts.

If potential criminal conduct is found by the regulatory agencies, they are obliged to report such facts to the public prosecutor for criminal enforcement purposes.


What sanctions and other measures can the authorities impose or seek in enforcement actions against healthcare providers?

As a result of audits and inspections, the ERS may issue recommendations and impose fines and other sanctions to remedy, replace or restore the conformity of the healthcare providers’ activity and respective premises with the applicable laws and regulations and to comply with healthcare users’ rights.

The ERS may also decide on applying precautionary measures when in the course of an investigation activities are discovered that can seriously and irreparably damage the regulated sector or healthcare users, or may be difficult to remedy. In this regard, the ERS may decide on the suspension of such activities by the infringer or on any measures to prevent or repair such damage that are likely to affect the final decision adopted in an administrative offence procedure.

Defences and appeals

What defences and appeals are available to healthcare providers in an enforcement action?

These are the same as those referred to in question 17.

Minimising exposure

What strategies should healthcare providers adopt to minimise their exposure to enforcement actions and reduce their liability once an enforcement action is under way?

Such strategies should be focused in the definition and implementation of strict compliance procedures to secure compliance with the applicable laws and regulations, as well as recurrent training and updating of healthcare providers’ employees on the applicable laws, regulations, best practices and compliance procedures. Internal audits should also be performed to monitor employees’ strict compliance with company procedures.

While the enforcement action is under way, cooperation with agencies is not only a legal requirement in the investigation phase but is, subject to a case-by-case analysis, also recommended, because it can be assessed as a mitigation factor in terms of applicable sanctions. Sound and effective compliance procedures in a healthcare provider’s company are always advisable to minimise enforcement risks.

Recent enforcement activities

What have the authorities focused on in their recent enforcement activity and what sanctions have been imposed on healthcare providers?

Quality and safety of the healthcare services, treatments and diagnosis, as well as adequacy of the healthcare unit facilities, constitute the main breadth of the enforcement activity by the authorities.

Most of the sanctions published on the ERS website correspond to the imposing of fines on healthcare units for the breach of legal requirements of healthcare unit operation and violation of users’ rights.

Self-governing bodies

Are there self-governing bodies for healthcare providers? How do those organisations police members’ conduct?


Remedies for poor performance

What remedies for poor performance does the government typically include in its contracts with healthcare providers?

The majority of healthcare providers are NHS hospitals (public hospitals and hospital centres) and facilities that operate under specific legislation and not under contracts.

However, there are NHS hospitals that operate under a public-private partnership regime by means of distinguished management contracts: one concerning the management of the hospital, medical equipment and of healthcare services; and the other on the management of the hospital premises. The conclusion of these management contracts is subject to public procurement procedures.

In the case of poor performance or breach of contractual and legal obligations, the most common remedies are the enforcement of penalties and the termination of contracts. The same remedies are usually ruled in contractual conventions concluded with individuals or legal persons for the provision of specific healthcare services provision to NHS users.

Private enforcement

Causes of action

What private causes of action may citizens or other private bodies bring to enforce a healthcare regulation or law?

There are three levels of accountability depending on the specific requirements laid out in law.

Civil liability

Civil liability may occur whenever damages and losses arise from infringements of civil law or of contractual provisions. State and other public entities may also be held liable under a specific extra-contractual civil liability - namely, individuals and entities of the public healthcare sector.

Criminal liability

Health-related criminal liability exists if the crime is actually undertaken by an individual and if the conduct is classified as a crime. In what concerns health, the following crimes are to be highlighted:

  • medical and surgical treatments in violation of current and common medical practices (article 150.º, No. 2 of the Portuguese Criminal Code (PCC));
  • medical and surgical treatments against the patient’s will (article 156.º of the PCC);
  • dissemination of disease and provision of medicinal substances disregarding the medical prescription (article 283.º of the PCC);
  • refusal of medical aid (article 284.º of the PCC); and
  • breach of secrecy (article 195.º of the PCC).

Disciplinary liability

Disciplinary liability mainly occurs whenever deontological law and ruling are breached, and depending on the sector (public or private) in which the healthcare provider commits the infringement, the law enforcement may be of a public or private nature.

Framework for claims

What is the framework for claims of clinical negligence against healthcare providers?

The framework may correspond to the violation of the good practices established for health professionals and healthcare institutions as well as of guidelines issued by public agencies, such as the DGS. Apart from the specific ruling arising from the above-mentioned practices and guidelines, the general standard is the bonus pater familia (ie, that every health professional shall act with the diligence and correctness that a ‘normal’ and typical health professional would act in that specific situation).

From a civil perspective, it is widely accepted by the Portuguese courts that the requirements for civil liability are the following:

  • action or relevant omission;
  • breach of law or of contractual provisions;
  • the occurrence of a damage;
  • guilty behaviour; and
  • causality between the damage and the defaulting conduct.

Courts are not reluctant to penalise public or quasi-public healthcare providers if the legal requirements are fully satisfied.

Seeking recourse

How and on what grounds may purchasers or users of pharmaceuticals or devices seek recourse for regulatory and legal infringements?

Users may submit complaints and report events and even submit suggestions to Infarmed on the following areas and subjects:

  • services rendered by entities regulated and supervised by Infarmed;
  • products regulated by Infarmed; and
  • services provided by Infarmed.

Besides the civil and criminal liability, as described in question 34, and respective grounds, product liability and adverse reactions may also serve as grounds.


Are there any compensation schemes in place?

There are no specific compensation schemes. The compensation is determined on a case-by-case basis and is fixed in accordance with the court criteria and respective assessment of the facts, means of proof and also in accordance with the nature and extension of the damages and losses.

Class and collective actions

Are class actions or other collective claims available in cases related to drugs, devices and provision of care?

The ‘popular action’, governed by Law No. 83/95 of 31 August, is a collective claim that can be brought by those seeking compensation for offences against public health or quality of life. In accordance with specific legislation, this action may be of administrative (public) or civil nature.


Are acts, omissions or decisions of public and private institutions active in the healthcare sphere subject to judicial or administrative review following a complaint from interested parties?

Public institutions are subject to administrative and judicial review. The statute of limitations for the interested parties to challenge the respective acts or omissions is dependent on the nature of the infraction. Remedies may consist of the revocation, suspension, amendment of an act or decision in the breadth of administrative offence or by judicial review. The enforcement of a specific conduct or the performance of a specific act and compensation of damages may also be granted by the judicial decision. In this regard, public entities may also be challenged for damages within the parameters of the extra-contractual civil liability regime pointed out above. Such claims are handled by administrative courts.

The challenging of private institutions may be of an administrative nature if the grounds of the complaint relate to infringements of regulatory duties, in which case the complaint may be enforced at the start before the competent regulatory authority and may be subsequently submitted to administrative courts. In the case of damages of a civil nature, challenging is subject to judicial civil review. The statute of limitations for the interested parties to challenge the acts or omissions of these private entities is also dependent on the nature of the infraction, and the remedies may be the same as the ones quoted for public entities.


Are there any legal protections for whistleblowers?

There is no general regime for whistleblowers even though specific regimes are set for money laundering, terrorism and drugs traffic. However, it is to be noted that whistleblowers may be criminally and civilly liable for defamation, namely in the case of persons of high reputation.

Does the country have a reward mechanism for whistleblowers?

There is no reward mechanism for whistleblowers in Portugal.

Are mechanisms allowing whistleblowers to report infringements required?

There is a specific mechanism for reporting corruption and fraud available on the website of the Central Bureau of Investigation and Prosecution of the Attorney General’s Office.

The reporting mechanism is accessed online and whistleblowers should identify the following:

  • the acts of corruption or fraud;
  • the date on which such acts occurred; and
  • the identities of the suspects.

Whistleblowers may also inform on the quantities at stake, individuals who may be relevant for ascertaining the facts and who may also submit documents to support such a complaint.

Whistleblowers may choose to remain anonymous.

Cross-border enforcement and extraterritoriality

Cooperation with foreign counterparts

Do prosecutors and law enforcement authorities in your country cooperate with their foreign counterparts in healthcare cases?

Yes. Prosecutors and law enforcement authorities in Portugal do cooperate with foreign authorities, as governed by Law No. 144/99 of 31 August.

Triggering investigations

In what circumstances will enforcement activities by foreign authorities trigger an investigation in your country?

Investigations are triggered whenever an illegal action has been committed and investigated for which Portuguese jurisdiction is competent.

Pursuing foreign entities for infringement

In what circumstances will foreign companies and foreign nationals be pursued for infringements of your country’s healthcare laws?

Whenever an infringement of Portuguese law occurs, foreign companies and foreign nationals may be pursued once the Portuguese jurisdiction and competence requirements laid out in law are fully met.

Update and trends

Current developments

What are the authorities’ enforcement priorities likely to be in the coming year? Are there any noteworthy cases pending? Are there any current developments or emerging policy or enforcement trends that should be noted?

The XXI Government Programme foresees several measures to be implemented in the health sector, among which is the reorganisation of the regulation and supervision, through the enlargement of the supervision and intervention capacities of the health sector regulatory authorities - mostly their preventive capacity. Transparency in the health sector and the promotion of a sustainable policy in medicines to accommodate the budgetary discipline, were also highlighted.

Infarmed established a strategic plan for 2017-19, which is based on the priorities outlined in the government programme as well as on the EU’s strategic priorities. Infarmed’s strategic plan enumerates six main objectives, among which is the sustainability of the health system based on the rational use of medicines and health products, and the effective and efficient use of resources.

As from 2015, several measures were enforced to control the costs regarding the acquisition of medicines, which were reinforced in 2017. The acquisition of medicines by NHS hospitals is now concentrated in the public company SPMS (Ministry of Health Shared Services). Infarmed is the designated authority that assesses all the health technologies to be used by NHS hospitals, being entitled:

  • to authorise, renovate or revoke the use of such technologies by the health system;
  • to decide on prices, reimbursement, acquisition or installation of health technologies within the health system;
  • to issue recommendations or decisions of use of any of such technologies when needed and along with the Ministry of Health’s other entities; and
  • to decide on the maintenance of reimbursements or acquisition of health technologies.

In addition, the improvement of Infarmed’s supervision of the medical devices market was also prioritised in the strategic plan - namely unique identification codes of medical devices being pointed out as a measure to reinforce the supervision and traceability of devices. Based on our experience, the supervision and inspection by Infarmed of the wholesale distributors of medical devices has increased in the past two years, and is expected to continue.