• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

The expanding net of corporate criminal liability in Canada: the new risk management

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

Canada October 8 2013

2013 has been an explosive year for the doctrine of corporate criminal liability in Canada. Employers need to be aware of their potential liability under criminal law for the actions and omissions of both those within their organization and third party contractors engaged by the company

Increased Penalties
On September 4, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal tripled the penalty the sentencing judge imposed on a construction company that failed to ensure the safety of its workers, resulting in the death of four workers and one left permanently injured (R. v. Metron, 2013 ONCA 541).
In that case, Metron had hired an independent contractor to project manage the repair of balconies of an apartment building, and the project manager in turn hired a site supervisor. Two swing stage platforms were assembled, supervised by both the project manager and the site supervisor. The swing stages had only 2 life lines, and the site supervisor, along with 5 other workers, boarded one swing stage at the end of their shift on the evening of December 24, 2009.
When the swing stage fell, one worker was properly attached to a lifeline and survived, another was improperly secured, suffering permanent injury, and the other four fell to their deaths. Metron plead guilty to one count of criminal negligence causing death under the Criminal Code, and the trial judge ordered a $200,000.00 fine against the company. On appeal, the court significantly increased the fine to $750,000.00, and in doing so, put its stamp of approval on the application of criminal liability to the actions of a third party that manages an important aspect of a corporation's business.
Agents, Third Parties and What Keeps Compliance Officers Up At Night
It is critical to remember that the project manager was a third party contractor hired by Metron, and it was the project manager who in turn hired the site supervisor. It was the site supervisor's responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm and death, including to ensure that, where only 2 life lines are available on a swing stage, that only 2 individuals are on that swing stage and are properly secured to the life lines. This was in fact the normal and usual practice on the project site.Increased Penalties
On September 4, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal tripled the penalty the sentencing judge imposed on a construction company that failed to ensure the safety of its workers, resulting in the death of four workers and one left permanently injured (R. v. Metron, 2013 ONCA 541).
In that case, Metron had hired an independent contractor to project manage the repair of balconies of an apartment building, and the project manager in turn hired a site supervisor. Two swing stage platforms were assembled, supervised by both the project manager and the site supervisor. The swing stages had only 2 life lines, and the site supervisor, along with 5 other workers, boarded one swing stage at the end of their shift on the evening of December 24, 2009.
When the swing stage fell, one worker was properly attached to a lifeline and survived, another was improperly secured, suffering permanent injury, and the other four fell to their deaths. Metron plead guilty to one count of criminal negligence causing death under the Criminal Code, and the trial judge ordered a $200,000.00 fine against the company. On appeal, the court significantly increased the fine to $750,000.00, and in doing so, put its stamp of approval on the application of criminal liability to the actions of a third party that manages an important aspect of a corporation's business.
Agents, Third Parties and What Keeps Compliance Officers Up At Night
It is critical to remember that the project manager was a third party contractor hired by Metron, and it was the project manager who in turn hired the site supervisor. It was the site supervisor's responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm and death, including to ensure that, where only 2 life lines are available on a swing stage, that only 2 individuals are on that swing stage and are properly secured to the life lines. This was in fact the normal and usual practice on the project site.

Increased Penalties
On September 4, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal tripled the penalty the sentencing judge imposed on a construction company that failed to ensure the safety of its workers, resulting in the death of four workers and one left permanently injured (R. v. Metron, 2013 ONCA 541).
In that case, Metron had hired an independent contractor to project manage the repair of balconies of an apartment building, and the project manager in turn hired a site supervisor. Two swing stage platforms were assembled, supervised by both the project manager and the site supervisor. The swing stages had only 2 life lines, and the site supervisor, along with 5 other workers, boarded one swing stage at the end of their shift on the evening of December 24, 2009.
When the swing stage fell, one worker was properly attached to a lifeline and survived, another was improperly secured, suffering permanent injury, and the other four fell to their deaths. Metron plead guilty to one count of criminal negligence causing death under the Criminal Code, and the trial judge ordered a $200,000.00 fine against the company. On appeal, the court significantly increased the fine to $750,000.00, and in doing so, put its stamp of approval on the application of criminal liability to the actions of a third party that manages an important aspect of a corporation's business.
Agents, Third Parties and What Keeps Compliance Officers Up At Night
It is critical to remember that the project manager was a third party contractor hired by Metron, and it was the project manager who in turn hired the site supervisor. It was the site supervisor's responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm and death, including to ensure that, where only 2 life lines are available on a swing stage, that only 2 individuals are on that swing stage and are properly secured to the life lines. This was in fact the normal and usual practice on the project site.

5. the program is properly monitored, audited, and updated as necessary.
Organizations must institutionalize comprehensive internal policies to reduce the chances of illegal practices taking place – otherwise, they leave themselves open to either a future criminal or regulatory prosecution.
Health & Safety Risk Management
For occupational health and safety matters, the new risk management requires a range of key considerations:
• update policies and procedures that all employees and agents must review and sign;
• ensure proper training on safety measures is taken;
• have appropriate oversight whether through a designated safety officer or otherwise;
• ensure that contracts with third party agents specify that they are to comply with the company's occupational health and safety policies and procedures; and
• perhaps most importantly, go beyond clauses that merely limit the company's liability for third party actions - consider providing mandatory training to third party agents as a condition of the contract, as well as the right to pro-actively audit compliance.
Organizations can no longer rely on shifting the liability onto the shoulders of the third party agent through a tightly drafted contract, if in fact the third party's role becomes that of a "senior officer". A more prudent approach in light of the recent caselaw is to implement a pro-active audit program of the company's internal systems, as well as those systems of the third party agent that intersect with the company.
For example, a company can conduct audits through surprise visits, to ensure that agents are complying with health and safety requirements. While this may have historically felt like micromanaging overkill, it may now be a necessary step in the new era of corporate criminal liability.
Next Steps
• Review your current occupational health and safety policies for completeness;
• Provide health and safety training to all employees, regardless of their level;
• Proactively engage your union and employee health and safety representatives to develop a culture of joint responsibility and liability, as well as important sets of extra eyes in the workplace;
• Ensure all employees review and sign your health and safety policies;
• Review contracts with third party agents and consider whether the contract delegates management of an important aspect of the business to the third party, which will merge the third party with the organization in criminal law;
• Provide training to third party agents where possible;
• Ensure future contracts with third party agents include terms and conditions that they will comply with the company's health and safety policies as well as the relevant legislation; and
• Demand audit rights for third parties, including surprise audits.
©

Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. For more information, please visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/client-resource-disclaimer.

Baker McKenzie - Kenneth Jull, William Watson, Lisa Stam and Cherrine C. Chow

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Canada
  • White Collar Crime
  • Baker McKenzie

Topics

  • Independent contractor

Popular articles from this firm

  1. International Trade Compliance Update *
  2. International Trade Compliance Update - July 2021 *
  3. Additional Relief and Leaves of Absence for Reasons Related to COVID-19: Bill C-2 *
  4. COVID-19 Government Intervention Schemes *
  5. A general introduction to the restructuring and insolvency legal framework in Canada *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Initial response to a report of suspicious activity (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Screening employees for roles in AML compliance (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to ensure sanctions screening and sanctions due diligence is effective (USA)

Related research hubs

  • Canada
  • White Collar Crime
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research