The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a request that it stay the mandate of its July 2012 ruling that “any payment from a patent holder to a generic patent challenger who agrees to delay entry into the market [must be treated by a factfinder] as prima facie evidence of an unreasonable restraint of trade.” In re K-Dur Antitrust Litig., Nos. 10-2077, -2078, -2079, 04571 (3d Cir., order entered August 14, 2012). Additional details about the ruling appear in Issue 39 of this Bulletin. The order was “without prejudice to the applicant’s right to file a timely petition for writ of certiorari” to the U.S. Supreme Court.