Many importers will discover at some point that products they import may be subject to anti-dumping duties (“ADD”) or countervailing duties (“CVD”). With the new Trump administration appearing to take a very aggressive tone toward unfair trade practices by foreign competitors, particularly China, there may soon be an increase in ADD/CVD orders and enforcement by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”). This article seeks to explain the options an importer has if it discovers that any of its products are potentially subject to ADD/CVD.

“Dumping” occurs when foreign manufacturers sell goods in a country for less than fair value, resulting in injury to the industry for those goods in the country in which the foreign product is being dumped. ADD cases are company specific. The U.S. calculates anti-dumping duties to bridge the gap between the unfair price of the dumped goods and the goods’ fair market value. On the other hand, countervailing duties are established when a foreign government provides assistance and subsidies to manufacturers so that the foreign manufacturers are able to sell goods cheaper than domestic manufacturers. CVD cases are country specific; duties are calculated to “duplicate the value of the subsidy.”[1] Duty rates of ADD/CVD are set by the Department of Commerce International Trade Administration (“ITA”).

To determine whether or not any products are subject to ADD or CVD, an importer should first review the scope of ADD/CVD orders, which can be found at Sometimes an importer will quickly be able to establish if its products are within the scope of the ADD/CVD orders, but often this is a difficult determination to make. ADD/CVD orders reference the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (“HTS”) classification of the goods subject to the orders, and the HTS classification of your product can sometimes help in making that determination. However, HTS classifications are listed in the scope of ADD/CVD orders for convenience only, and do not determine whether a product falls under the scope of an ADD/CVD order. Instead, the written description of the order’s scope is dispositive. It may also be helpful to discuss the application of ADD/CVD orders with a Customs Import Specialist or an ITA International Trade Compliance Analyst. This will also not produce a binding determination, though.

The only method for obtaining a binding determination to confirm whether goods are subject to a ADD/CVD order is a scope ruling. A scope ruling is issued by the ITA to clarify the scope of an ADD/CVD order. Some scope rulings are self-initiated by the ITA, but generally an “interested party” initiates an inquiry by applying for a scope ruling. An “interested party” is defined in the Tariff Act of 1930 (as amended) and includes 1) a foreign manufacturer, producer, or exporter, or the U.S. importer, of subject merchandise; 2) the government of a country in which the merchandise is produced, manufactured, or exported; 3) a U.S. manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler of a domestic like product; and 4) unions, trade associations, and business associations that represent industry engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale of a domestic like product in the U.S.[2] For an interested party, the scope ruling application is a mechanism to explain and describe the characteristics of a product and argue why the product is outside the scope of the ADD/CVD order. Preparing and submitting a scope ruling request can be very technical and procedurally complicated. A simplified outline of a scope ruling request follows.

Scope ruling requests must contain the following:

  • A detailed description of the product, including its technical characteristics and uses, and its current U.S. tariff classification number;
  • A statement of the interested party’s position as to whether the product is within the scope of an order, including:
    • A summary of the reasons for this conclusion,
    • Citations to any applicable statutory authority, and
    • Any factual information supporting this position, including relevant prior scope rulings.[3]

At the same time it submits a scope ruling request to ITA, an interested party must also serve a copy of the scope ruling request to all parties on the Comprehensive Scope Service List.[4] Scope ruling requests must include a Company Certification of Accuracy, Representative Certification of Accuracy, and Certificate of Service. Importantly, a request submission is not considered complete without these certifications.

After preparing a scope ruling request, it must be submitted electronically via the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (“ACCESS”), found at First time users of ACCESS will need to register first; a confirmation email will be sent once the registration has been processed and approved. After receiving the scope ruling request through ACCESS, the ITA has a 45-day deadline to either issue a final ruling or initiate a scope inquiry. If a scope inquiry is initiated, notice will be sent to all parties on the Comprehensive Scope Service List, comments will be solicited, and the ITA will typically issue a final ruling within 120 days of the initiation of the inquiry.[5] If a final ruling determines that the product falls within the scope of the ADD/CVD order, then any suspension of liquidation will continue or, if there has been no suspension of liquidation, CBP will suspend liquidation and require a cash deposit of estimated duties pursuant to the ADD/CVD order. If a final ruling holds that the product is not subject to the ADD/CVD order, then any suspension of liquidation on the subject product will end and any cash deposits or bonds related to the product will be refunded and released, respectively.[6]

Scope ruling requests often involve difficult questions of fact and law. If you require any guidance in the preparation and submission of a scope ruling request, please contact experienced legal counsel.