We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Last month at the Federal Circuit - July 2013

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA July 29 2013

In Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp., No. 12-1167 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2013),

the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s grants of SJ, holding that U.S. Patent No. 6,077,291 

(“the ’291 patent”) was not infringed and that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,077,281 

(“the ’281 patent”) were invalid as anticipated.

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP - Brandon S. Bludau, Daniel F. Klodowski and Timothy P. McAnulty
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • USA
  • Litigation
  • Patents
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Tagged with

  • Federal Circuit

Popular articles from this firm

  1. How to Make Patent Office Guidance Work for You at PTAB *
  2. Unreasonable Delay in Filing Patent Infringement Litigation May Prevent Suit in a District Where Defendants Have Ceased to Have a Physical Presence *
  3. 3D Printing: The Next Frontier *
  4. High Court Could Open Door to Worldwide Patent Damages *
  5. Got Expanded Collaborative Search Pilot (CSP) Program?! *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Litigation
  3. Patents

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Patents

  1. USA
  2. Pakistan
  3. Japan
  4. More...
Barbara Clancy
Legal Counsel
International Rugby Board
What our clients say

"The newsfeeds deliver us the most recent legal analysis and practical information. There seems to be a broad analysis which is beneficial to us in analyzing various areas of law. It provides a snap shot update of various legal developments and assists us in staying current. The articles are well covered and include the right amount of detail. The size and depth of articles are good too, so we can get to the information one needs very quickly. The articles are typically of high calibre and from high-calibre authors who provide sufficiently succinct articles so that one can learn much about new developments in a short amount of time. I like the format because it is easy to scan for relevant articles. It's a great tool. I like the fact you can tailor the newsfeeds by jurisdiction and work area, and only receive information relevant to your practice."

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group