We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Your Basket
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Environmentalists try to bypass EPA at the state level to stop pesticide use in Oregon

Wiley Rein LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA August 24 2012

Unwilling to wait for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to act, the Northwest Environmental Advocates (NWEA) on August 9 filed a petition requesting that the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission implement measures mitigating the use of pesticides described in several biological opinions issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).

Wiley Rein LLP - Eric Andreas
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google Plus
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later

Filed under

  • USA
  • Environment & Climate Change
  • Wiley Rein LLP

Tagged with

  • Oregon
  • US EPA
  • Environmentalism

Popular articles from this firm

  1. The FCRA and the FTC’s Affiliate Marketing Rule: a solicitation is a solicitation? *
  2. Myth-busting: sales & use taxes in private aircraft transactions. *
  3. FinCEN clarifies insurance companies’ anti-money-laundering requirements *
  4. Statute of limitations on avoidable preference actions *
  5. Chapter 11 permits modification and extension of loans without consent of the lender *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. US EPA
  2. USA
  3. Environment & Climate Change

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions: Oil & Gas

  1. USA
  2. Netherlands
  3. Venezuela
  4. More...
Lori M Berreman
Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer
The MMIC Group
What our clients say

"I LOVE this resource. Absolutely the best and most reliable single source of what’s going on that affects our business. THANKS!!"

Back to Top
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group