Which domestic laws and regulations govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in your jurisdiction?
Articles 605 to 609 of the General Code of Procedure, enacted through Law 1564 (2012), govern the recognition of foreign judgments. Articles 422 onwards govern the enforcement of judgments, including foreign judgments that have been granted recognition in Colombia.
Which international conventions and bilateral treaties relating to the recognition and enforcement of judgments apply in your jurisdiction?
The Inter-American Convention on Extraterritorial Validity of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards 1979 and the Inter-American Convention on Execution of Preventive Measures 1979 apply to the recognition and enforcement of judgments in Colombia.
Which courts are competent to hear cases on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments?
The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice has exclusive jurisdiction to decide on recognition. Enforcement of a foreign judgment granted recognition by the Supreme Court is governed by the same rules as enforcement of a domestic judgment. The competent court will depend on the disputed amount and the domicile of the defendant. The civil courts are competent to enforce judgments, except where the judgment involves a state or state-owned entity. In cases of enforcement against state or state-owned entities, the administrative courts are competent.
Distinction between recognition and enforcement
Is there a legal distinction between the recognition and enforcement of a judgment?
A foreign judgment is recognised in Colombia through an exequatur procedure. Once the exequatur has been granted, the interested party may seek enforcement of the judgment through a collection proceeding before the domestic courts, under the same rules that govern enforcement of domestic judgments.
Ease of enforcement
In general, how easy is it to secure recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in your jurisdiction?
A foreign judgment will be enforceable in Colombia, provided that it:
- does not relate to the rights to real property located in Colombia at the time of filing the suit;
- does not contravene Colombian public policy law or regulations;
- is a final judgment not subject to appeal in accordance with the applicable foreign laws;
- does not relate to a matter on which the Colombian courts have exclusive jurisdiction;
- does not refer to an issue pending decision or already decided by the Colombian courts;
- has been obtained in compliance with the applicable foreign laws relating to service of process on the defendant; and
- is recognised by the Supreme Court pursuant to an exequatur proceeding.
Are any reforms to the framework on recognition and enforcement of judgments envisioned or underway?
Conditions for recognition and enforcement
Which types of judgment (eg, monetary judgments, mandatory or prohibitory orders) are enforceable in your jurisdiction and which (if any) are explicitly excluded from recognition and enforcement (eg, default judgments, judgments granting punitive damages)?
Exequaturs may be requested in relation to foreign judgments and equivalent decisions (decisions on the merits of a case). Further, in January 1999 the Supreme Court of Justice expressly stated that in order for a foreign judgment to be eligible for exequatur, it must be final and binding. For example, a decision issued by a foreign judge on an interim or precautionary measure will not be considered final and, therefore, will not be subject to an exequatur procedure in Colombia.
No type of judgment is explicitly denied enforcement in Colombia. However, specific performance – excluding the signing of documents – is not enforceable as a remedy under Colombian law (ie, the obligee will not be held in contempt of court for failing to perform under a judgment requiring specific performance). The creditor may then request damages in lieu of such performance.
How are foreign judgments subject to appeal treated?
If a foreign judgment is not final and binding in its local jurisdiction (ie, the parties may file a motion or recourse against it, including an appeal), it will not be recognised or enforced in Colombia.
What are the formal and documentary requirements for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments?
When filing for the exequatur of a foreign judgment, the party that seeks recognition must provide:
- a certified copy of the foreign judgment, either through a legalisation procedure or with the apostille; and
- a translation of the foreign judgment if it is not in Spanish.
Colombia is party to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents 1961.
What substantive requirements (if any) apply to the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments? Are enforcing courts in your jurisdiction permitted to review the foreign judgment on the merits?
The exequatur procedure does not relate to the merits of a case. The court’s review is based solely on formal grounds. However, the defendant in an exequatur proceeding may allege that the foreign judgment breaches Colombian public policy as a ground to resist recognition.
What is the limitation period for enforcement of a foreign judgment?
Colombian law does not expressly state a limitation period for enforcement of a foreign judgment. If the judgment is no longer enforceable under the law pursuant to which it was made, then the exequatur will be denied.
However, the Civil Code establishes a five-year limitation period for collection actions. This limitation period may apply to foreign judgments when filing for enforcement.
Grounds for refusal
On what grounds can recognition and enforcement be refused?
A foreign judgment will be refused exequatur if it does not comply with the following requirements set forth in the General Code of Procedure:
- The judgment does not relate to real property rights located in Colombia at the time of filing the suit.
- The judgment does not contravene Colombian public policy law or regulations.
- The judgment is final and is not subject to appeal in accordance with the applicable foreign laws.
- The judgment does not relate to a matter on which the Colombian courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
- The judgment does not refer to an issue pending decision or already decided by the Colombian courts.
- The judgment has been obtained in compliance with the applicable foreign laws relating to service of process on the defendant.
Service of process
To what extent does the enforcing court review the service of process in the original foreign proceedings?
As stated above, review of the service process is required for the admissibility of the exequatur suit. The Supreme Court reviews whether process was served on the defendant in accordance with the applicable foreign law.
What public policy issues are considered in the court’s decision to grant recognition and enforcement? Is there any notable case law in this regard?
The Supreme Court will not grant recognition of a foreign judgment that contravenes Colombia’s public policy. The Constitution enshrines a right to due process, which encompasses the right to:
- present one’s case;
- submit evidence; and
- have access to the evidence produced against oneself.
A breach of these basic procedural protections may result in the denial of recognition. The constitutional right to equal protection, as well as human and fundamental constitutional rights, will prevail over a foreign judgment that is incompatible with such guarantees and enforcement will likely be denied. Findings in the foreign judgment that relate to waivable rights of the defendant are less likely to raise public-policy objections.
What is the extent of the enforcing court’s power to review the personal and subject-matter jurisdiction of the foreign court that issued the judgment?
No Supreme Court of Justice decision is known to have denied recognition based on a finding of lack of jurisdiction of the foreign court. However, if a case arises where there is a manifestly obvious lack of jurisdiction of the foreign court, the Supreme Court may deny the exequatur on grounds such as violation of the service of process. Further, recognition would be denied where the Colombian courts have exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction and a proceeding is ongoing.
Concurrent proceedings and conflicting judgments
How do the courts in your jurisdiction address applications for recognition and enforcement where there are concurrent proceedings (foreign or domestic) or conflicting judgments involving the same parties/dispute?
If the foreign judgment refers to an issue pending decision by the Colombian courts or an issue that has already been decided by the Colombian courts, the Supreme Court of Justice will dismiss the exequatur suit.
No case is known to have involved conflicting foreign judgments, one or both of which were submitted for recognition; however, the Supreme Court of Justice would likely deny the exequatur of a foreign judgment that resolves an issue previously resolved in a foreign judgment over which the exequatur was granted. Such conflict may also be decided through consideration of the proper jurisdiction of the courts or res judicata in regard to the first judgment that became final and binding.
What defences are available to the losing party to a foreign judgment that is sought to be recognised and enforced in your jurisdiction?
Pursuant to Article 607 of the General Code of Procedure, the losing party can object the exequatur of a foreign judgment within five days, based solely on the following grounds for dismissal:
- The judgment relates to real property rights located in Colombia at the time of filing the suit.
- The judgment contravenes Colombian public policy law or regulation.
- The judgment is not final and is subject to appeal in accordance with the applicable foreign laws.
- The judgment relates to a matter on which the Colombian courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
- The judgment refers to an issue pending decision or already decided by the Colombian courts.
- The judgment has not been obtained in compliance with the applicable foreign laws relating to service of process on the defendant.
What injunctive relief is available to defendants (eg, anti-suit injunctions)?
No case is known of where anti-suit injunctions have been granted in an exequatur proceeding in Colombia. However, with the issuance of the General Code of Procedure, injunctions have been made available in declaratory proceedings and the Supreme Court of Justice could interpret this provision as applicable to an exequatur proceeding.
Recognition and enforcement procedure
What is the formal procedure for seeking recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment?
The party seeking recognition of a foreign judgment must file an exequatur suit before the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice.
If the suit is admitted, the defendant must file its statement of defence within five days of service of process. After such period, the Supreme Court of Justice will schedule a hearing for:
- the practice of evidence requested by the parties;
- the closing arguments; and
- a final decision.
If the exequatur is granted, the foreign judgment could be subject to a collection proceeding before the competent court.
What is the typical timeframe for the proceedings to grant recognition and enforcement?
The typical timeframe for proceedings to grant recognition and enforcement is approximately two years.
What fees apply to applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments?
Exequatur proceedings are free; however, the parties will incur costs such as legal expenses and other fees (eg, fees related to the practice of evidence).
Must the applicant for recognition and enforcement provide security for costs?
Are decisions on recognition and enforcement subject to appeal?
Decisions on recognition are not subject to appeal. However, decisions on enforcement are subject to appeal on the same grounds available for an appeal against the enforcement of a domestic judgment. The standard of review on appeal is de novo review.
How does the enforcing court address other costs issues arising in relation to the foreign judgment (eg, calculation of interest, exchange rates)?
Absent a decision on post-judgment interest in the foreign judgment, the Colombian court will likely dismiss any claim of interest. In relation to the applicable exchange rate, the court will apply Colombian law (ie, the exchange rate at the date of payment).
Enforcement against third parties
To what extent can the courts enforce a foreign judgment against third parties?
The courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against third parties.
Partial recognition and enforcement
Can the courts grant partial recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments?
No Supreme Court decision is known to have granted a partial exequatur over a foreign judgment; however, the law does not expressly preclude its possibility.