• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Research tools
    • Global research hub
    • Lexy
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner
    • Research reports
  • Resources
  • Research tools
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

Whistleblower protection: OSHA issues interim final rule implementing Consumer Financial Protection Act regulations

Sidley Austin LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA April 4 2014

The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued an interim final rule on April 3, 2014 establishing procedures for employee complaints of retaliation under the whistleblower provisions of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (“CFPA”). Though this interim final rule is still open to public comment, it is effective immediately and therefore it is important for employers in the consumer financial products and service industries to be aware of the substantive protections and procedural mechanisms that mirror the other whistleblower regulations that OSHA promulgates. OSHA now has responsibility for the oversight and enforcement of the whistleblower provisions of the CFPA as well as twenty-one other statutes that protect employees from retaliation for reporting violations of various workplace, environmental, consumer protection, and commercial transportation regulations.

The CFPA

The CFPA – Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 – established whistleblower protections and created the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the “Bureau”). Under the CFPA, covered employees in the consumer financial product and service industries are protected from retaliation for reporting violations of the CFPA or any other statutory provision under the jurisdiction of the Bureau. Covered employers include those engaged in offering or providing a financial service and any affiliate that acts as a service provider to the employer. Protected activity covers a wide variety of actions, including providing information regarding any violation of the CFPA or related law to the Bureau, state or local authority, or employer; testifying in or instituting proceedings under the CFPA provisions; or refusing to take part in conduct that the employee reasonably believes violates these provisions. Reasonable belief under the CFPA requires the complainant to have both a subjective good-faith belief as well as an objectively reasonable belief that the reported conduct violates the CFPA. Retaliation under the CFPA is not limited to termination and can include other adverse employment actions, including reduction in pay or hours, denial of benefits, discipline, reassignment, and demotion. A complainant has the initial burden of establishing that the protected activity was a “contributing factor” in the retaliatory action. In order to rebut this allegation, an employer must show by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the adverse employment action regardless of the engaged in protected activity. Employers should be aware that the barriers to filing a complaint appear to be extremely low and a wide variety of employee actions can initiate the complaint process.

New Procedural Provisions

The interim regulations implement procedures for the retaliation complaint process and cover the filing of the complaint, the OSHA investigation, appeals to and hearings by an Administrative Law Judge, as well as subsequent judicial review. Complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged retaliatory action and an employee or a person acting on behalf of the employee may file the complaint directly with OSHA. The interim rule allows for complaints to be submitted in any language either in writing or orally. Within 60 days of the filing of the complaint, OSHA is required to issue its findings. Any objections to the findings must be filed within 30 days with the chief Administrative Law Judge. Further review can be sought by petitioning the Administrative Review Board as well as through an appeal seeking judicial review. Finally, a whistleblower may file a new complaint with a district court within 90 days of receiving a written determination or if a final decision has not been issued within 210 days of filing the complaint.

As the interim final rule is still open to public comment, comments may be submitted electronically here, the Federal eRulemaking Portal, via mail or facsimile. See the Federal Register notice for details. Comments must be submitted by June 2, 2014.

Sidley Austin LLP - Brian J. Gold and Max C. Fischer

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Banking
  • Employment & Labor
  • White Collar Crime
  • Sidley Austin LLP

Topics

  • Whistleblower
  • Federal Register
  • Judicial review

Organisations

  • OSHA

Popular articles from this firm

  1. EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive — What Do UK- and U.S.- Headquartered Companies Need to Know? *
  2. EPA Conducts Flyovers in New Mexico and Texas *
  3. Rail Transport in the USA *
  4. SEC Publishes Bulletin on Conflicts of Interest for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers *
  5. August Antitrust Bulletin: Top-of-Mind Global Antitrust Issues *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to navigate challenges relating to Source of Wealth and Source of Funds (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to comply with due diligence requirements for financial institutions determined to be of primary money laundering concern (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to monitor Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance (USA)

Related research hubs

  • Whistleblower
  • USA
  • Banking
  • Employment & Labor
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research