I have recently taken on a new case involving an 8-year-old boy who suffered serious injuries, including a brain injury, in a road traffic accident. My client was knocked over by an 80 year old who drove through a red light at speed. The accident occurred on the 1st September 2016, just five days before a Swansea University academic  reported the findings of his research that older drivers are not dangerous and compulsory age-related testing will not reduce the number of road traffic accidents.
Circumstances of the road accident involving 8-year-old child and an 80-year old driver
My client was crossing the road at traffic lights when he was hit by the defendant’s car. The police investigation is ongoing, but they informed my client’s mother that the driver was an 80-year-old man who drove through a red light at speed. The accident occurred during daylight hours, and the road layout is such that my client would have been clearly visible to the driver as he crossed the road. The police have ruled out drink driving or use of a mobile phone as possible causes for this accident. They have indicated that the driver’s age may have been a factor in the cause of the accident.
High profile road accident involving a child and an 80-year old driver
The circumstances of my new case reminded me of the tragic accident involving 80-year-old Norma Stokes who inflicted serious brain injuries on an 11-year-old girl after her car mounted the pavement and struck a group of eight children. Five of the girls suffered injuries.
It was reported in the press that the brain-injured girl can no longer read or write as before, suffers short-term memory loss and epilepsy. These symptoms are typical of someone suffering a serious brain injury. The girl’s mother said that it was like her daughter had died in the crash because she is not the same girl as before her accident.
Stokes was sentenced in June for five counts of causing serious injury by dangerous driving. This case provoked debate, again, about compulsory testing for older drivers. The judge-passing sentence, David Aubrey, QC, said:
“This case illustrates the need for the government to urgently review, if it is not doing so already, the manner in which the elderly can or should be permitted to continue driving and hold a UK driving licence”.
The former nurse had an unblemished driving record, with not even a single penalty point on her licence prior to the accident. Nevertheless, as with every child who suffers a brain injury in a road accident, the consequences for the injured child and her family were catastrophic.
Current legal position
Drivers must apply to renew their licence at the age of 70, and every three years thereafter. As part of the application, they are legally obliged to declare any medical conditions, which could affect their driving, and must confirm that they can still read a number plate at 70ft.
What surprises me is that there is no requirement for any formal medical or driving test. The self-declaration relies on the judgement and honesty, of the individual. This seems strange to me in view of the fact that it is well recognised that a car was potentially a dangerous weapon , and the potentially catastrophic consequences of road accidents involving children.
How many elderly drivers are on our roads?
The latest figures from the Department for Transport reveal that there were 4.5 million people aged 70 or over in the UK who had a full driving licence.
This number is set to increase dramatically as these figures produced by Age UK  demonstrate:
- The number of people aged 65+ is projected to rise by over 40 per cent (40.77%) in the next 17 years to over 16 million
- By 2040, nearly one in four people in the UK (24.2%) will be aged 65 or over
- The number of people over 85 in the UK is predicted to more than double in the next 23 years to over 3.4 million
- The population over 75 is projected to double in the next 30 years
- Nearly one in five people currently in the UK will live to see their 100th birthday
The need for formal testing for elderly drivers
As there is no formal medical or test as to whether an elderly person is still fit to drive, this could lead to hundreds of thousands of drivers making the wrong decision about their ability to drive.
In a report by Transport Research Laboratory for the RAC Foundation , they analyse data from several countries and conclude that self-assessment tools can give older drivers useful feedback about their skills, but they cannot replace the professional assessment of driving abilities. Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the RAC Foundation, said:
“All drivers should regularly consider their fitness to drive, but matters really come to a head when we reach 70 and have to declare that we are fit to be on the roads. In general older drivers have an enviable safety record but it is clear that faced with this critical yes or no decision many motorists simply do not have a realistic view of their capabilities.
“While this will mean there are drivers who are unfit to be on the roads there will be many others who have prematurely hung up their keys. This will have a huge impact on their ability to live an active life, access essential services and take part in social activities.
They estimated that around a third of drivers turning 70 will give up driving prematurely; however, 10% are likely to continue driving with poor levels of ability. Referring to the statistics above, that is still an alarming number of people.
In 2015, Benjamin Brooks-Dutton launched a high profile petition calling for compulsory testing every three years for drivers upon reaching their 70th birthday, following the death of his partner by an 85-year-old driver who mounted the pavement. To date, over 200,000 people have signed the online petition. 
The Department of Transport have no plans to restrict licensing or make it compulsory for older drivers to undergo additional training despite high profile road accidents involving elderly drivers.
I recognise that driving gives older people freedom and independence, without which, they may become depressed and isolated. However, I also recognise that as we age we suffer physical, cognitive and sensory decline, which could affect our driving ability, and I think something as important as this should be the subject of an independent, objective test. We age differently, so I appreciate that an age related testing may seem illogical, however, the potential consequences of a serious road accident make it imperative, in my view, that we introduce compulsory, periodic testing for drivers aged 70.