An extract from The Initial Public Offerings Law Review, 4th Edition
There are two primary stock exchanges in China, the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE). The SSE consists of the Main Board and the Technology Innovation Board, whereas the SZSE consists of the Main Board, the Small and Medium Enterprises Board (the SME Board) and ChiNext (a board consisting mainly of high-technology companies).
According to the 2018 Annual Report of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), as of the end of 2018, 3,584 companies were listed on the SSE and SZSE, with 99 new listings throughout 2018, 1,923 companies were listed on the Main Boards of the SSE and the SZSE, 922 companies were listed on the SME Board and 739 companies were listed on ChiNext. The total market capitalisation of these listed companies was 43.50 trillion yuan, which was 48.32 per cent of China's total 2018 GDP.
There were two major developments in China's capital markets in 2019. First, the SSE officially launched the Technology Innovation Board, which is based on a registration-based system and permits the listing of pre-profit technology companies. As of the end of 2019, 70 companies have successfully listed on the Technology Innovation Board. Second, on 28 December 2019, China adopted the 2019 amendment of its Securities Law (the 2019 Securities Law), which will take effect on 1 March 2020. The 2019 Securities Law codifies a registration-based system that will apply to all stock exchanges, not just the Technology Innovation Board. Furthermore, for the first time at the legislative level, the 2019 Securities Law delegates listing review powers to the stock exchanges themselves, as opposed to the prior practice where the CSRC had such review powers. The SSE and SZSE will be responsible for administering CSRC rules, and are empowered by the CSRC to enact rules under the CSRC's supervision in the very near future. Accordingly, as of 1 March 2020, the stock exchanges will have the power to examine and verify IPO listing applications, determine whether applications fulfil issuance and information disclosure requirements, and provide comments on the content of information disclosure.
Although the 2019 Securities Law sets forth the basic principle that IPOs in China will be registration-based as of 1 March 2020, the supporting implementation regulations have yet to be issued. Therefore, the standards and procedures set forth in this chapter will still follow the existing Securities Law and its relevant regulations.
Governing rulesi Main stock exchanges
As discussed in Section I, the SSE consists of the Main Board and the Technology Innovation Board, whereas the SZSE consists of the Main Board, the SME Board and ChiNext.Main Board (SSE and SZSE)
The Main Board of the SSE primarily attracts established blue-chip companies such as state-owned enterprises. In recent years, however, the Main Board of the SSE attracted private companies from industries other than traditional state-owned blue-chip companies.SME Board
The SME Board targets small and medium-sized enterprises with shares in circulation of under 100 million. The listing requirements for the SME Board and the Main Board are nearly identical.ChiNext
ChiNext was established on 30 October 2009 to support small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in the high-technology sector. Although the overall listing requirements for ChiNext are lower than the ones set forth for the Main Board and the SME Board, the CSRC generally exercises greater regulatory scrutiny, such as increasing the number of members on the issuance review committee, prolonging the sponsor's supervisory period and imposing more rigorous delisting rules.
Presently, there are only a few Chinese companies (primarily state-owned) that are dual listed in China and an overseas exchange (usually the Hong Kong Stock Exchange). Chinese companies are not prevented from pursuing dual listings after listing on a domestic stock exchange, though this would require approval from the CSRC.
Some Chinese companies choose to list on foreign exchanges in lieu of listing on a domestic exchange, such as the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Among foreign-listed Chinese companies, some choose to list overseas mainly for business reasons, such as avoiding profitability threshold requirements. Others choose to list overseas because of China's restrictions on foreign investment in certain industries. Particularly in the technology, media and telecommunications sectors, owing to regulatory restrictions and practice that effectively prevents controlling foreign ownership in a Chinese operating company, some issuers adopt foreign parent entities and list abroad using the variable interest entity (VIE) structure. However, joint ventures involving foreign ownership in a non-restricted sector are permitted to list on China's domestic exchanges.Technology Innovation Board
On 1 March 2019, the CSRC and the SSE issued the Rules of the Technology Innovation Board, which took effect on the same day. These rules introduced a registration-based system and eased listing standards to accommodate qualified technology companies. On 22 July 2019, the Technology Innovation Board officially opened for trading. As of the end of 2019, 70 companies have listed on the Technology Innovation Board.
The Technology Innovation Board may be considered a breakthrough in China's capital market for the following reasons:
- Removal of profit requirement: pre-profit technology industries such as information technology, high-tech manufacturing, new materials, new energy and environmental protection, along with pre-revenue bio-tech companies, may list on the Technology Innovation Board. In practice, pre-profit companies such as Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co, Ltd have successfully passed the SSE's examination and have completed registration procedures with the CSRC, allowing them to list on the Technology Innovation Board.
- Unweighted voting rights: the Technology Innovation Board permits, for the first time in the mainland capital markets, technology companies with unweighted rights to list. In practice, UCloud Technology Co, Ltd, which had an unweighted voting rights structure, successfully passed the SSE's examination and has completed the registration procedure with the CSRC, allowing it to list on the Technology Innovation Board.
- Red-chip companies may list: red-chip companies (those whose parent entity is incorporated outside mainland China and whose primary business activities are in China, including VIE structure companies), may apply for a public offering of its stock in mainland China or through the issuance of Chinese depository receipts (CDRs), though listing standards are higher (see below). In practice, China Resources Microelectronics Limited (CRM) successfully passed the SSE's examination and is awaiting registration with the CSRC.
- Spun-off companies may list: the Technology Innovation Board permits, for the first time in mainland capital markets, spun-off technology companies to list.
At present, all listing applications are submitted to and approved by the CSRC except for the Technology Innovation Board, which has a registration-based system. If an applicant engages in a business subject to regulatory oversight by specific agencies, the CSRC will require these agencies to issue a no-objection letter in respect of the applicant.
Table 1 sets forth the main requirements for the Main Board, SME Board, ChiNext and the Technology Innovation Board. Tables 2a and 2b set forth the main requirements for red-chip companies. These companies must be qualified enterprises, whether they are listing stocks or CDRs, in addition to satisfying the requirements under the rules of the Technology Innovation Board.Table 1: Issuers incorporated in China
|IPO requirements||Main Board and SME Board||ChiNext||Technology Innovation Board|
|Issuer qualifications||A company limited by shares that is duly incorporated and validly existing in China.|
|Business records||At least three years of continuous operations or as otherwise approved by the State Council (where a limited liability company is converted into a company limited by shares through the conversion of the entire original book value of its net assets, the term 'continuous operation' may start from the date the limited liability company was established).||At least three years of continuous operations (where a limited liability company is converted into a company limited by shares through the conversion of the entire original book value of its net assets, the term 'continuous operation' may start from the date the limited liability company was established).|
|Pre-profit alternatives for the Technology Innovation Board only||One of the following five thresholds (four of which do not have profitability requirements) where expected market value:|
|Assets||Proportion of intangible assets (after deduction of land use aquaculture, mining and similar rights) at the end of the most recent accounting period in net assets of ≤20 per cent.||Net assets at the end of most recent accounting period of ≥20 million yuan and no uncovered losses.||N/A|
|Capital||Pre-listing capitalisation of ≥30 million yuan; or post-listing capitalisation of ≥50 million yuan.||Post-listing capitalisation of ≥30 million yuan.|
|Major business||No significant changes in the past three years.||Only one major business; no significant changes in the past two years.||No significant changes in the past two years.|
|Directors and senior management||No significant changes in the past three years.||No significant changes in the past two years.|
|Actual controller||No change in the past three years (the definition of 'actual controller' is based on several legally prescribed factors that are applied to each individual case based on the facts and circumstances of such case).||No change in the past two years.|
The issuer's business must not compete with the business of the issuer's controlling shareholder, actual controller, or other enterprises controlled by such controlling shareholder or actual controller. The definitions of 'controlling shareholder' and 'actual controller' are based on several legally prescribed factors that are applied to each individual case based on the facts and circumstances of such case.
Although this item was officially removed in a 2015 revision of the listing rules on the condition that there is full disclosure of this item in the prospectus, in practice, the CSRC still devotes special attention to this item. Therefore, it is effectively still a listing requirement.
|The business of the issuer's controlling shareholder, actual controller, or other enterprises controlled by such controlling shareholder or actual controller must not compete with the issuer's business in a manner that may have a significant adverse impact on the issuer.|
|Related-party transactions||No unreasonable related-party transactions; related-party transactions must be at arm's length and must not manipulate profits.||Related-party transactions must not significantly influence the issuer's independence or be unreasonable.|
|Fund management||Rigorous fund-management procedures; the issuer's fund is not controlled by any controlling shareholder, actual controller or other enterprises controlled by any controlling shareholder or actual controller in respect of borrowing, the use of debt as compensation, advance payments or any other similar form.||Not a listing requirement, but required to be disclosed in the prospectus.||N/A|
|Tax||Taxes paid in accordance with law; no heavy reliance on tax preferences.||Not a listing requirement, but required to be disclosed in the prospectus.||N/A|
|Debt||No major credit risk; not a party to any major contingent liability such as a guarantee, litigation or arbitration that may adversely affect the issuer's continuous operation.||Not a listing requirement, but required to be disclosed in the prospectus.||No need to significantly rectify ownership of major assets, core technologies, trademarks, etc.; no major credit risk; not a party to any major contingent liability such as a guarantee, litigation or arbitration that may adversely affect the issuer's continuous operation.|
|Use of proceeds||Definitive plan for use of IPO proceeds; generally, IPO proceeds will be used for the principal business and investment projects.||Definitive plan for use of IPO proceeds; generally, IPO proceeds will be used for the principal business but not necessarily for investment projects.||N/A|
|Other authorities' opinion||Subject to the opinions of the provincial government.||N/A||N/A|
|Issuer qualifications||Large red-chip companies already listed overseas||Large unlisted red-chip companies|
|Expected market value/operating income/valuation||Expected market value is not less than 200 billion yuan.||Operating income is not less than 3 billion yuan in the past year; and valuation is not less than 20 billion yuan.|
|Alternatives||N/A||Accelerated operating income, independent R&D capability, leading international technology and advantageous market position with an expected market value not less than 10 billion yuan or an expected market value not less than 5 billion yuan and operating income not less than 500 million yuan in the past year.|
|Status||Issuer conforms to standards relating to national strategy, achieving core technology and market acceptance.|
|Industry||Innovative enterprises that have achieved considered scale such as the internet, big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, software and integrated circuits, high-tech manufacturing, bio-tech and other high-tech industries, and strategic emerging industries.|
|Requirements||Issuance of stock||Issuance of CDRs|
|Listing requirements||Be a qualifying enterprise (see Table 2a).|
|Satisfy the other threshold listing requirements of the Technology Innovation Board.|
|Jurisdiction||The company law of the issuer, but higher standards will be applied for the purposes of investor protection.|
|Disclosure||Full disclosure of any VIE structure, unweighted voting rights or other similar arrangement.|
Compared with the NYSE, Nasdaq and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Chinese stock exchanges (except for the Technology Innovation Board) are currently unique in the following respects (however, as stated above, the Technology Innovation Board's reforms that have already taken effect and the 2019 Securities Law will substantially alter China's IPO landscape):
- Applicant eligibility: unlike the NYSE, Nasdaq and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, A-share applicants have to be companies limited by shares that are incorporated in China. Therefore, foreign issuers (such as Hong Kong, US or Cayman parent companies) cannot be listed on Chinese stock exchanges. However, a joint venture incorporated in China operating in a non-restricted industry where foreign investment is permitted may list on Chinese stock exchanges. Furthermore, eligible red-chip companies may apply to list on the Technology Innovation Board.
- Financial criteria: unlike the NYSE, Nasdaq and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, each financial listing threshold requires the issuer's net profits to be positive. However, pre-profit companies are permitted to apply to list on the Technology Innovation Board. Furthermore, we note that the 2019 Securities Law revised a core listing condition for IPOs in China from 'sustainable profitability' to 'sustainable operational capability', which means there is a good chance that profitability requirements on all stock exchanges, not just the Technology Innovation Board, may be lifted in the future.
- Review process: the CSRC currently still uses an approval (rather than a registration) system that requires substantive review of all issuers. As a result, review times tend to be relatively longer and susceptible to policy considerations. As mentioned above, after the comprehensive promotion of the registration-based system, the role of the CSRC will turn towards being responsible for review of registration applications and supervision of the capital market. However, with the introduction of the registration-based system under the 2019 Securities Law, the CSRC will no longer be responsible for reviewing listing applications. Rather, the CSRC will instead review registered applications and supervise capital markets generally.
- Board of supervisors requirement: A-share listed companies are required to have a board of supervisors consisting of at least three members. Employee representative supervisors may not be less than one-third of the board of supervisors. Directors and senior management may not concurrently be supervisors. The purpose of the supervisor is to oversee the activities of the board of directors and the senior management.
- Competition: the CSRC devotes special attention to analysing potential competition between the issuer, on the one hand, and its controlling shareholder, actual controller or the enterprises controlled by the controlling shareholder or actual shareholder on the other. Generally, mere disclosure of such potential competition in the prospectus will be insufficient and the absence of such competition is effectively still a listing requirement, even though this item was officially removed in the 2015 revision of the listing rules.
- Foreign investment restrictions: if the issuer conducts business in an industry where foreign investment is restricted or prohibited (according to law or in practice), the issuer may not list in China. The CSRC will not accept indirect control arrangements such as VIE structures, unlike the NYSE, Nasdaq and Hong Kong Stock Exchange. However, red-chip enterprises (including those with VIE structures) can now apply to list on the Technology Innovation Board. Segway-Ninebot Limited, a company with a VIE structure, has applied to list on the Technology Innovation Board through the issuance of CDRs, though to date the application has not passed yet.
- Lock-up periods: the listing rules for Chinese IPOs specifically state that the controlling shareholder or actual controller is subject to a three-year lock-up period. All other shareholders are generally subject to a one-year lock-up period. This differs from other jurisdictions where lock-up periods are primarily determined by the underwriters and not by the listing rules. The length of the lock-up period is also longer compared with Hong Kong, where controlling shareholders are only subject to a six-month lock-up period.
The listing requirements for the Main Board (SSE and SZSE) are set forth in the Administrative Measures for Initial Public Offerings and Listings of Shares. The listing requirements for ChiNext are set forth in the Administrative Measures on Initial Public Offerings of and Listing of Shares on ChiNext. All listings must comply with the requirements set forth by the Company Law, the Securities Law, and other specific rules and requirements of the applicable exchange.
With regard to the CSRC's application of these rules, there have been the following general trends.Accelerated review
The CSRC's review schedule accelerated, starting in the middle of November 2016. In 2017, the CSRC's issuance examination committee reviewed 488 IPO applications – a much faster pace than in previous periods. In 2018 and 2019, the CSRC maintained this accelerated pace. In fact, in practice, for stock exchanges other than the Technology Innovation Board, the time between pre-disclosure and approval in 2018 and 2019 was approximately 15 months, shorter than the approximately 19-month wait in 2017. With the introduction of the registration-based system under the 2019 Securities Law, we believe that the pace of review will be accelerated after 1 March 2020. For the Technology Innovation Board, the review period in practice has been shorter, with an average time of no more than six months, in line with or even shorter than international standards.Increased success rate of applications
Although the CSRC has accelerated its review of prospective applications, its practice of only selecting high-quality applicants that meet its listing standards reduced the overall success rate of applications in 2018. In 2016, the CSRC's issuance examination committee reviewed 266 applications, of which 241 were successful, resulting in a pass rate of 90.6 per cent. However, in 2017, the CSRC's issuance examination committee reviewed 488 applications (83 per cent more than the previous year), of which 380 were successful, resulting in a pass rate of 77.87 per cent. In particular, from 17 October 2017 (the date when the new issuance examination committee took office) to 28 December 2017, the pass rate for IPO applications was at just 57.78 per cent, significantly lower than before. In 2018, the CSRC's issuance examination committee reviewed 185 applications (a much lower number than previous years), of which 111 were successful, resulting in a pass rate of about 60 per cent, which is the lowest in the past five years.
In 2019, the pass rate for Technology Innovation Board IPOs was 95 per cent. Perhaps due to the roll-out of the Technology Innovation Board in 2019, the CSRC's approach to applicants proposing to list on other stock exchanges also changed with a bias towards approval. The issuance examination committee reviewed 164 applications, of which 138 were successful, resulting in a pass rate of over 80 per cent, which is much higher than the 60 per cent pass rate in 2018.