Chief ALJ Luckern held that respondent Satistec, LLC failed to show cause for its failure to respond to the notice of investigation and, thus, issued an Initial Determination finding Satistec in default in Inv. No. 337-TA-732, In the Matter of Certain Devices Having Elastomeric Gel and Components Thereof. Previously, on September 15, 2010, complainant Interactive Life Form, LLC moved for an order directing Satistec to show cause why it should not be held in default for failing to respond to the amended complaint and notice of investigation. On September 29, 2010, Chief ALJ Luckern ordered respondent Satistec to show cause, no later than the close of business on October 13, 2010, why it should not be found in default. Satistec failed to respond. As a result, Chief ALJ Luckern found Satistec in default pursuant to Commission Rule 210.16.