An extract from The Projects and Construction Review, 11th Edition
Free will has its manifestation even in the jurisdictional sphere. Parties to a contract can choose to submit to the jurisdiction of a foreign court as long as there is a connection to the chosen jurisdiction and the dispute is pecuniary. There is an exception to this openness, however: Argentine courts claim exclusive jurisdiction over debtors domiciled in the country. If a debtor's domicile is abroad, insolvency proceedings in Argentine courts will only touch those assets held in the country.
When it comes to choice of law, contractual parties are generally free to choose which laws will govern their agreements. In such cases, and to avoid reference to a different legal system than the one agreed upon, the parties tend to consent that only the direct rules of the chosen country shall apply. However, the major caveat is that foreign law will not be accepted if it flouts Argentine public policy. As a consequence, disputes involving bankruptcy, tax, criminal and labour laws will be governed by the Argentine public policy laws corresponding to those areas. Specifically, Argentine law shall also govern rights and legal actions relating to real estate and movable property located permanently in the country.
Foreign judgments and arbitral awards, for their part, are enforceable in Argentina, either in accordance with international treaties or the Unified Civil and Commercial Procedural Code. If a country has signed a treaty with Argentina regarding foreign judgments, those procedures will prevail; if not, the Unified Civil and Commercial Procedural Code shall apply in federal court. (Each province has its own rules for enforcement of foreign judgments in its local courts.) Article 517 of the Code sets out several requirements that a foreign judgment must meet for it to be enforced in Argentina. The judgment must have been issued by a competent court, as determined by Argentine law; be final and valid in the foreign jurisdiction, and later authenticated according to Argentine law; and cannot conflict with Argentine public policy, or with a prior or contemporaneous judgment in the Argentine courts. Finally, the defendant must have undergone due process of law, including a proper summons and a chance to defend itself.
Once all these prerequisites are fulfilled, a number of procedural requirements must also be satisfied before enforcement can occur. The petitioner must file a statement proving that the aforementioned legal requirements are satisfied; all documents in a foreign language must be translated into Spanish by a translator registered in Argentina; a copy of the foreign judgment must be notarised and filed with the appropriate Argentine court; and all pertinent documents must be authenticated by the Argentine consulate located in the foreign court's jurisdiction. Finally, a 3 per cent court tax must be paid upon enforcement.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral decisions follows the same framework. As long as both the legal and procedural steps are fulfilled, foreign arbitral awards will be accepted by Argentine courts. If a treaty applies, however, its procedural and substantive requirements take precedence. Notably, Argentina has been bound by the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) since 1988.