Use the Lexology Navigator tool to compare the answers in this article with those from 20+ other jurisdictions.
General climate and trends
General innovation climate
What is the general state of fintech innovation in your jurisdiction, including any notable trends, innovations, innovators and future prospects?
In recent years, the fintech sector has experienced significant growth in Denmark. This has been facilitated by:
- a highly educated and digitally literate population;
- a high degree of digitisation of public sector systems;
- the support of specific government policies aimed at promoting fintech innovation; and
- the development of Copenhagen as an international fintech hub.
Under the auspices of Copenhagen Fintech (copenhagenfintech.dk), a dedicated fintech lab opened in Copenhagen in 2016 (fintechlab.dk) and has become a central hub for fintech activity in Denmark.
Over the last few years, a number of partnerships between fintech start-ups and banks have been announced, which reflects the current trend of fintech companies seeking to partner and cooperate with existing financial sector bodies rather than attempting to be in competition with and opposition to them.
While there has been significant activity in traditional fintech core areas such as payments and investment services, ancillary areas such as ‘regtech’ and ‘insurtech’ remain less developed, but are expected to grow in the future.
Have there been any particular developments – regulatory or commercial – in any of the following fintech sectors?
Distributed ledger technology and digital currencies (eg, blockchain, smart contracts and Bitcoin)?
Distributed ledger technology (DLT) and digital currencies are not subject to bespoke regulation.
Significant resources are being dedicated to research and development in DLT-based products throughout the value chain with Danish banks participating in several of the biggest international DLT-consortia such as R3 and we.trade.
Digital currencies are also the subject of research and development projects particularly with firms active in live trading, settlements and other products. However, sentiment – both in the general public and particularly among incumbent market participants – is influenced by the relatively conservative approach that the Financial Supervisory Authority and in particular the Central Bank have taken towards digital currencies and their usefulness.
Alternative lending platforms?
Alternative lending platforms are not subject to specific regulation in Denmark.
While traditional short-term and payday loan providers have had a substantial presence in Denmark for a number of years, cheap bank and mortgage financing has meant that other alternative lending platforms still occupy only a very small part of the market, both in terms of the number of active platforms and the size of their assets. For the same reason, in recent years interest has been particularly focused on platforms offering loans to:
- physical persons living in areas of Denmark where depressed real estate valuations make mortgage loans expensive or unavailable; or
- small and medium-sized businesses still suffering from the effects of the credit crunch during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
Digital payments, remittances and foreign exchange?
On the regulatory side, changes worth noting are:
- a continued significant – and critical – focus by the Financial Supervisory Authority on anti-money laundering compliance, particularly in remittance and foreign exchange businesses and as a consequence of this:
- the introduction of a licence requirement to carry out foreign exchange activities in 2017;
- policy initiatives to strengthen sanctions (including very significant increases in levels of fines) for violations of anti-money laundering regulations;
- the adoption by the government (and as a consequence, also the Financial Supervisory Authority) of an express fintech and innovation-friendly policy leading to the creation of a dedicated fintech office at the Financial Supervisory Authority and the opening of a regulatory sandbox; and
- the implementation of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 (2015/2366/EU), through the adoption of the Payments Act on January 1 2018.
On the commercial side, 2017 saw both the launch by Nets of an app version of the domestic Dankort debit card as well as the arrival of Apple Pay in Denmark. Both events will increase the fierce competition with mobile payments platform Mobilepay, which is backed by most Danish banks.
Looking ahead, it is expected that the introduction of the Payments Act on January 1 2018 will relax the previously strict national rules on the use of payment data, thus paving the way for products and value-added services making greater use of payment data.
Alternative financing (including crowdfunding)?
Crowdfunding and other types of alternative financing are not subject to bespoke regulation in Denmark.
Non-bank lending or equity crowdfunding vehicles currently have a relatively limited market share. Recently, several projects have been launched which focus on crowdfunding the ownership of real estate.
Investment, asset and wealth management?
There are a number of different platforms being developed in which investment products are offered in a more user-friendly way than through traditional platforms.
From a regulatory perspective, the key developments have included the implementation of:
- the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive (2014/65/EU), which came into force on January 3 2018; and
- the Fourth EU Anti-money Laundering Directive (2015/849/EU), which came into force on June 27 2017.
Further, at the beginning of 2017 the Financial Supervisory Authority lowered the own funds requirements for smaller investment firms to ensure a level playing field with other EU member states.
Robo-advice and artificial intelligence?
No particular developments.
Any other technologies?
No particular developments.
How would you describe the regulatory policy for fintech products and services in your jurisdiction?
The government has specific policies aimed at promoting fintech business and investments and for supporting Copenhagen as an international fintech hub. Recently, this has resulted in increased funding for the Financial Supervisory Authority enabling it to dedicate resources to a specialised fintech office as well as creating a regulatory sandbox.
Have any fintech-specific laws or regulations been enacted in your jurisdiction? Are any envisaged?
Which government authorities regulate the provision of fintech products and services?
The main financial regulator is the Financial Supervisory Authority which also oversees compliance with anti-money laundering regulation.
Compliance with certain business conduct rules and other consumer and competition-oriented rules is overseen by the Competition and Consumer Authority.
The Data Protection Agency oversees compliance with data protection rules.
Finally, the Central Bank has limited oversight over systemically important payment and securities clearing and settlement infrastructures and similar systems.
Financial regulatory framework
Which laws and regulations governing the provision of financial services apply to fintech businesses?
Depending on the nature of the activity, fintech businesses may be subject to one or more of the following, each of which include associated delegated regulations:
- the Financial Business Act – implementing the EU Capital Requirements Directive IV (2013/37/EU), the EU Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EU) and the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive (2014/65/EU), if the activity involves deposit-taking, investment services or insurance activities;
- the Payments Act – implementing the EU Payment Services Directive 2 (2015/2366), if the activity involves the offering of payment services or the issuing of e-money;
- the Capital Markets Act – implementing a number of EU financial directives, including parts of the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive, the EU Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EU), the EU Transparency Directive (2004/109/EU) and the EU Financial Collateral Directive (2002/47/EU), if the activity involves the offering of investment services;
- the Act on Financial Advisers, Investment Advisers and Residential Credit Intermediaries – implementing the EU Directive on Credit Agreements for Consumers Relating to Residential Immovable Property (2014/17/EU) and certain parts of the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive, if the activity involves certain forms of advice or intermediation;
- the Investment Association Act – implementing the EU Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (2009/65/EU), if the activity involves the establishment or management of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities;
- the Act on Alternative Investment Fund Managers – implementing the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (2011/61/EU), if the activity involves the establishment or management of an alternative investment fund;
- the Credit Contracts Act – implementing parts of the EU Consumer Credit Directive (2008/48/EU), if the activity involves lending or other forms of credit primarily to consumers;
- the Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism – implementing the Fourth EU Anti-money Laundering Directive (2015/849/EU); and
- until February 23 2018, the Insurance Mediation Act – implementing the EU Insurance Mediation Directive (2002/92/EU), if the activity involves insurance distribution. From February 23 2018 this act will be replaced by a new Insurance Mediation Act – implementing the EU Insurance Distribution Directive (2016/97/EU), if the activity involves insurance distribution.
Under what conditions are fintech businesses subject to licensing requirements? Are there any exemptions?
Deposit-taking activities generally require a banking licence under the Financial Business Act to legally operate in Denmark. There are no de minimis or similar exemptions available.
It should be noted that lending in itself is not an activity requiring a licence in Denmark –although a registration under the Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism may be required (as described below) – except that under the Financial Supervisory Authority's current guidance, EU banking institutions may be required to passport their licence into Denmark if they wish to perform lending activities in Denmark.
Payment services or e-money issuance
Performing payment services – as defined in the Annex to the Payments Act implementing Annex I to the EU Payment Services Directive 2 (2015/2366/EU) or issuing e-money requires a licence under the Payments Act.
The Payments Act generally reflects the catalogue of exemptions to the licence requirement in Article 3 of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 and Article 1 of the Second EU Electronic Money Directive (2009/110/EU), except that technical services covered by the exemption in Article 3(j) of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 are subject to certain fee regulations in the Payments Act.
Specifically regarding the limited network exemption (Article 3(k) of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 and Article 1(4) of the Second EU Electronic Money Directive), it is important to note that although limited network products are exempted from the licence requirement, they are still required to comply with the disclosure, business conduct and fee rules of the Payments Act, as well as the regulation on issuance and redemption of e-money (corresponding mainly to Titles III and IV of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 and Article 11 of the Second EU Electronic Money Directive). However, the disclosure, business conduct and fee rules do not apply to e-money issued within a limited network if:
- the instrument cannot load a value of more than Dkr3,000;
- the instrument cannot be re-loaded; and
- the issuer's aggregate outstanding e-money liabilities do not exceed an amount equivalent to €5 million, in which case only the rules on redemption of e-money apply.
Denmark has not elected to use the options in Article 32 of the EU Payment Services Directive 2 and Article 9 of the Second EU Electronic Money Directive, to exempt low volume and low value payment services or e-money from the licensing requirement, but the Payments Act does provide for a less burdensome licensing process for such providers and issuers and they are also exempt from the own funds requirements.
Unless performed by a licensed bank, foreign exchange activities require a licence under the Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism. Exemptions from certain parts of the act are available for entities where the foreign exchange activities are de minimis – including a requirement that the foreign exchange business does not account for more than 5% of the entity's aggregate annual turnover – and purely ancillary to the entity's main business.
The provision of investment services – as defined in the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive – as well as custody services triggers a licensing requirement under Danish law.
There are three different sizes of investment firms in terms of own funds requirements:
- Small investment firms are subject to a minimum own funds requirement of €50,000 and a share capital of Dkr500,000 and the Capital Requirements Regulation own funds requirements and are permitted to provide:
- reception and transmission of orders;
- execution of orders;
- discretionary portfolio management; and
- investment advice.
- Medium investment firms permitted to provide the same investment services as small investment firms in addition to safe keeping (which is a core service in Denmark) are subject to a minimum own funds requirement of €125,000 and a share capital of Dkr500,000 and Capital Requirements Regulation own funds requirements.
- Large investment firms permitted to provide all types of investment services are subject to a minimum own funds requirement of €730,000 and a share capital of Dkr500,000 and Capital Requirements Regulation own funds requirements.
The licensing exemptions set out in Article 2 of the EU Markets in Financial Instruments II Directive have generally been implemented without material changes.
Undertakings that provide investment advice must be licensed as an investment adviser if the undertaking does not hold another licence that permits it to provide investment advice. Investment advisers may also provide the service of reception and transmission of orders.
Undertakings that provide advice on financial products to consumers must be licensed as a financial adviser. For this purpose "financial products" means credit agreements, except for residential credit agreements, deposits, insurances, pension and investment products. Investment products means transferable securities, units or shares in collective investment schemes, deposits in banks where the return depends on the performance of one or more underlying assets, guarantee certificates, cooperative certificates and mortgage deeds.
Residential credit intermediation
Undertakings that provide advice on or arrange or facilitate residential credit agreements to consumers must be licensed as a residential credit intermediary. Residential credit agreements essentially cover the granting of loans secured on real estate.
Alternative investment funds
Managing alternative investment funds triggers a registration or licensing requirement depending on the size of the assets of the managed investment fund. The threshold for authorisation rather than registration is assets under management by the manager of €100 million (or €500 million if certain conditions are complied with). A manager that is authorised has to comply with all the requirements of the legislation implementing the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, whereas a registered manager only has to comply with a few limited requirements.
Alternative investment funds must appoint an alternative investment fund manager or be self-managed. If an alternative investment fund is self-managed it must comply with the requirements as if it were being managed by an alternative investment fund manager. Accordingly, a self-managed alternative investment fund will also need to be either registered or licensed as an alternative investment fund manager depending on the value of the assets in the fund.
The definition of alternative investment funds have been implemented from the EU Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive without material changes.
Insurance activities generally trigger a licensing requirement. The Financial Business Act provides certain specific exemptions to the licensing requirement, none of which would be expected to be relevant for fintech businesses.
If the activity does not amount to being an insurance company but does involve insurance distribution, the activity will not require a licence until February 23 2018 – which is the projected date of the introduction of the new Insurance Mediation Act. Until then, only insurance brokers are required to have a licence to be allowed to practise insurance distribution.
Following the introduction of the new Insurance Mediation Act, all insurance and reinsurance intermediaries are required to be licensed to practice insurance distribution. There are no exemptions to this requirement. On the other hand, intermediaries who only perform "ancillary insurance intermediation" are only required to be registered.
In the new act, insurance distribution is defined as in the EU 2016 Insurance Distribution Directive as being the activities of advising on, proposing or carrying out other work introductory to the conclusion of contracts of insurance, but also concluding the contracts or assisting in the administration and performance of such contracts. Also included is the activity of operating a portal through a medium where the customer can compare different insurance products and through which the insurance contract can be concluded (directly or indirectly). Certain insurance distribution activities are explicitly excluded from the scope of the new act, however, none of which would be expected to be relevant for fintech businesses.
An insurance (or reinsurance) intermediary is defined as any natural or legal person who against remuneration takes up or pursues the activity of (re)insurance distribution and who is not a (re)insurance company or employees of a (re)insurance company or an ancillary insurance intermediary.
An ancillary insurance intermediary is defined as any natural or legal person (save for credit institutions and investment companies) that against remuneration takes up or pursues the activity of insurance distribution on an ancillary basis, which means that the distribution must not be their main business. Further, the insurance that the company sells must be supplementary to goods or services provided by the company. Further, it is a condition to fall within the term "ancillary insurance intermediary" (and thereby not subject to licensing requirements, but only registration) that the intermediary does not provide life assurance or liability risks, unless such coverage is supplementary to the goods or services.
Fintech businesses that are not otherwise required to have a licence under any of the above regulations must be registered with the Financial Supervisory Authority if they perform any of the activities set out in Annex I to the Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, including:
- financial leasing;
- assistance in offering securities and services ancillary thereto; and
- storage, administration and management of securities.
Are any fintech products or services prohibited in your jurisdiction?
No, subject to appropriate licences being obtained. However, it should be noted that use and processing of payment data for value-added and other services is significantly more restricted in Denmark than what follows from the EU Payment Services Directive 2.
Data protection and cybersecurity
What rules and regulations govern the processing and transfer (domestic and cross-border) of data relating to fintech products and services?
The Danish Act on Processing of Personal Data applies to fintech products and services if personal data is processed or transferred. The act implements the EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EU) and applies to all data processing relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (eg, name, account and credit card information, customer identification and internet protocol address).
The EU General Data Protection Regulation will apply as of May 25 2018 and introduces new requirements such as documentation and record keeping of processing activities and allows the Data Protection Agency to impose fines up to 4% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover or €20 million. As a result of the regulation, a new Data Protection Act will be introduced in 2018.
Fintech products and services that involve the processing of personal data on behalf of another company (the customer or data controller) require that a written data processing agreement is entered into. Further, if data is transferred outside the European Union, a legal basis for the transfer must be in place. Such a legal basis may be the EU Commission's "Model Contracts for the transfer of personal data to third countries" or the EU-US Privacy Shield for the transfer of data to the United States.
What cybersecurity regulations or standards apply to fintech businesses?
Financial businesses (eg, banks, investment firms and insurance companies), payment institutions and e-money institutions are generally subject to requirements to have prudent IT and cybersecurity systems, procedures and policies. However, apart from these general regulatory requirements, there are no generally applicable statutory cybersecurity regulations or standards.
Particularly within payment services there are a number of important IT and cyber security standards including:
- the European Banking Authority Guidelines on the Security of Internet Payments – these guidelines form part of the Financial Supervisory Authority's supervision and will continue to do so until gradually replaced by the Regulatory Technical Standards on Strong Customer Authentication and Common and Secure Open Standards of Communication and by the Guidelines on the Security Measures for Operational and Security Risks of Payment Services;
- the Regulatory Technical Standards on Strong Customer Authentication and Common and Secure Open Standards of Communication (promulgated under the EU Payment Services Directive 2), which is expected to be issued in the first half of 2018 and to enter into force in the second half of 2019;
- the Guidelines on the Security Measures for Operational and Security Risks of Payment Services (promulgated under the EU Payment Services Directive 2); and
- the IT industry security standards promulgated by the Payment Card Industry – particularly the Data Security Standard and the Payment Application Data Security Standard. It should be noted that although constituting widely accepted industry standards, the Payment Card Industry standards do not constitute public law regulation and as such are not directly enforced by the Financial Supervisory Authority.
What anti-fraud, anti-money laundering or other financial crime regulations govern the provision of fintech products and services?
Fraud and financial crimes in general are regulated by the Criminal Code. The most relevant offences are set out in Chapter 28 of the Criminal Code. These are offences where the perpetrator seeks an unlawful gain or directly or indirectly harms and endangers property belonging to others. This includes classic provisions (eg, on theft, embezzlement, deceit, fraud, including defrauding creditors, misappropriation of funds and breach of fiduciary duties, including providing the authorities with false or misleading information concerning a company's accounts).
It is specifically set out in Section 279a of the Criminal Code that computer fraud can be punished if any person who, for the purpose of obtaining for him or herself or others an unjustified gain by doing the following:
- unlawfully changes, adds or erases information or programmes for the use of electronic data processing; or
- attempts to affect the results of data processing in any other manner.
As a general rule, criminal liability according to the Criminal Code requires intent to commit a criminal fraudulent act for the purpose of gain, which causes a corresponding loss to the victim.
The main piece of anti-money laundering legislation is the Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, which implements the Fourth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive. To the extent that the relevant service involves money transfers, the act is supplemented by the EU Regulation on Information Accompanying Transfers of Funds.
Corporate crime and business fraud is investigated by the National Police and the State Prosecutor for Serious Economic and International Crime.
What precautions should fintech businesses take to ensure compliance with these provisions?
Compliance with anti-money laundering regulations can to a certain extent be addressed by ensuring proper legal and compliance advice is sought at the product or service design phase.
However, the primary protection against any type of financial crime is establishing and operating a robust internal compliance programme – including, where appropriate, whistleblowing procedures – and ensuring that the business is supported by a sufficiently staffed and empowered compliance department (eg, if relevant, taking size and complexity of the business into consideration, a three-line defence structure). Being able to demonstrate that an appropriate compliance programme has been put in place may also assist the business in reducing the severity of supervisory enforcement action if – notwithstanding an appropriate compliance programme being in operation – the business does become the subject of some kind of financial crime (eg, breaches of anti-money laundering regulations).
What consumer protection laws and regulations apply to the provision of fintech products and services?
The main applicable consumer protection laws include the following:
- the Consumer Contracts Act – implementing parts of the EU Directive on Consumer Rights (2011/83/EU) and the EU Directive on Distance Marketing of Consumer Financial Services (2002/65/EU), which contains rules on pre-contractual information requirements, right of withdrawal, termination and binding periods;
- the Marketing Practices Act – implementing the EU Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices (2005/29/EU), which in addition to the rules implementing the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive contains rules on, among other things:
- unsolicited marketing;
- comparative advertisements;
- marketing of consumer credit; and
- rules governing the Consumer Ombudsman's activities. The Marketing Practices Act also contains the general rule that businesses must comply with good marketing practices;
- the Payments Act – implementing the EU Payment Services Directive 2, which contains rules implementing the disclosure, business conduct and fee rules set out in Titles III and IV of the directive and corresponding provisions of the Second EU E-money Directive (2009/110/EU);
- the Credit Contracts Act – implementing parts of the EU Consumer Credit Directive (2008/48/EU), which applies to credit arrangements with consumers and which contains, inter alia:
- mandatory disclosure requirements;
- rules on changes to interest rates;
- walk-away rights; and
- rules on term and termination;
- the Executive Order on Good Business Practices for Financial Businesses – implementing parts of the EU Directive on Consumer Rights, which contains rules on duty of care to the customer, disclosure requirements, the giving of advice to customers and restrictions on amending or terminating customer contracts and applies to inter alia:
- mortgage banks;
- investment firms; and
- insurance companies;
- the Executive Order on Good Business Conduct for Insurance Distributors (projected to be introduced from February 23 2018) – implementing parts of the EU Insurance Distribution Directive (2016/97/EU), if the activity involves insurance distribution.
Does the provision of fintech products or services in your jurisdiction raise any particular competition regulatory concerns?
The fintech nature of a product or service does not in itself give rise to particular competition law issues.
However, there are aspects of the fintech business model which mean that certain competition law considerations – of general application – often become relevant in the context of fintech businesses.
One example of this is the widespread use of partnerships between fintech businesses and incumbent financial institutions which, depending on the nature of the partnership, may raise competition law questions about horizontal or vertical cooperation.
At the other end of the spectrum, fintech products or services which require the fintech business to have access to a financial institution's systems or its customer data, where reluctance to provide such access may, in certain circumstances, raise questions of anti-competitive behaviour.
Are there any particular regulatory issues concerning the cross-border provision of fintech products and services (eg, operating jurisdiction rules and currency controls)?
Denmark does not have currency controls.
To the extent that the relevant fintech product or service involves a regulated activity, fintech businesses from other EU member states may need to passport an existing licence from their home member state into Denmark and fintech businesses from other third countries may need to obtain a separate licence under the relevant Danish regulatory framework, depending on the nature of the product or service.
Although Danish law does not generally require foreign businesses operating in Denmark to establish a Danish branch, the activities may ultimately reach a scale where general principles of Danish company law will require the relevant fintech business to establish a Danish branch. The determination of when the local activities reach such a scale is highly fact-specific.
Financing, investment and government support
Does the government provide any incentives or support programmes to promote fintech innovation in your jurisdiction (eg, tax incentives, grants and regulatory sandboxes)?
The Danish government's support schemes are primarily organised through the following funds:
- The Innovation Fund Denmark – (innovationsfonden.dk) currently operates several schemes the most relevant of which are:
- InnoBooster offers grants of up to Dkr5 million to "knowledge-based innovative projects from small and medium sized companies, start-ups and scientists"; and
- Grand Solutions offers grants to "highly ambitious research and innovation projects across the entire research and development value chain with regards to economic value, creation of new jobs innovative approaches to societal challenges".
- The Danish Growth Fund – (www.vf.dk) also operates several different schemes including:
- loans where the Danish Growth Fund makes subordinated loans of Dkr1 million or more to economically sound small and medium-sized enterprises as part of "an integral part of a complete financing solution that includes financing from banks and other financial institutions", but where the company's own collateral is insufficient to obtain the full financing from private sources;
- loans for entrepreneurs which are subordinated loans of Dkr1 million or more to "young, established companies" who have live products, positive turnover and a customer base but whose collateral is no longer sufficient to secure full financing from private sources. It is a requirement that there is a minimum of 50% private co-financing that that the entrepreneurs owning the company assume personal liability for the outstanding debt; and
- subordinated loans which are made for the purpose of supporting a company's equity. The minimum amount of a subordinated loan is Dkr2 million and it "must be part of a complete financing solution that includes financing from banks or other lenders". Among the eligibility criteria are that the company must generally have a turnover and a balance sheet of at least Dkr20 million and the solidity must be at least 10% (and preferably 25% or more after obtaining the subordinated loan).
- Venture capital which is venture capital from the Danish Growth Fund's venture capital arm VF Venture.
In addition to the above funding schemes, the Financial Supervisory Authority will open its newly created regulatory sandbox in 2018. In terms of purpose and eligibility criteria, the new sandbox is similar to the existing sandbox operated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority.
Has the government concluded any international cooperation agreements to promote and facilitate the cross-border expansion of fintech businesses?
The Financial Supervisory Authority has entered into an agreement for a ‘fintech bridge’ with the Monetary Authority of Singapore the purpose of which is to aid Danish and Singapore fintech firms in accessing each other's markets.
The Financial Supervisory Authority also participates in a newly created "Nordic roundtable" focusing on fintech and EU Payment Services Directive 2 in the Nordic region.
Financing and investment
What private financing and investment schemes are available and commonly used for fintech start-ups in your jurisdiction?
Denmark has traditional business angel, venture capital and private equity communities based on individual private contracts. No widely used private multilateral or open door funding schemes are available in Denmark.
What forms of IP protection are available for fintech innovations?
In Denmark, fintech innovations may be protected as an invention under patent law if the innovation is patentable. This includes filing for a patent and meeting the requirements under Danish patent law (patentable subject matter, novelty and inventive step, among others). In continuation hereof, a fintech innovation may be protected as a utility model where the bar for protection is lower compared to a patent.
Further, if the innovation is embodied in software coding, copyright protection may be available to the author (in this case the programmer) if the software coding has a sufficient degree of originality. In addition, fintech innovations may be protected as sui generis database rights if the conditions for protection are met pursuant to Section 71 of the Danish Copyright Act (incorporating the EU directive on the Legal Protection of Databases (96/9/EU).
Although not intellectual property in the traditional sense, the protection of a fintech innovation may be available under trade secret law under the Danish Marketing Practices Act if the innovation is kept secret.
What rules govern the ownership of IP rights to fintech innovations?
Fintech innovations created by an employee, which can be protected under patent law or as a utility model belong to the employer as a main rule if the invention is created within the employer's field of work or if the invention relates to a specified task given by the employer. The legal framework for such a transfer is regulated by the Danish Act on Inventions made by Employees. If the employer is a public research institution, the transfer of such rights is regulated by the Danish Act on Inventions at Public Research Institutions.
The copyright to a fintech innovation as software is transferred to the employer if created under the employment. This follows from the Danish Copyright Act.
The ownership of IP rights is usually governed on a contractual basis between the parties and in the case of employees through employment contracts. Several of the statutory provisions in the Danish Act on Inventions made by Employees and the Act on Inventions at Public Research Institutions are mandatory and thus cannot be derogated on a contractual basis.
What immigration schemes are available for fintech businesses to recruit skilled staff from abroad? Are there any special regimes specific to the tech or financial sector?
Citizens from other EU and European Economic Area countries or Switzerland, may work in Denmark under the EU rules on free movement of persons and services.
As a clear starting point, employees from outside the European Union, the European Economic Area and Switzerland are required to have a work permit in order to work in Denmark.
There are several immigration schemes aimed at the recruitment of skilled staff. However, none are specific for the technology or financial sector. The two most relevant schemes for a fintech business are:
- the Pay Limit Scheme – which ensures that an employee is granted a work permit, if the annual salary is over a certain minimum (approximately €56,000 in 2018) and the employment terms correspond to Danish standards; and
- the Positive List scheme – under which residence and work permits are granted to employees who have been offered jobs that are listed on the Positive List covering certain professions and fields that are currently experiencing a shortage of qualified professionals. The list contains more than 100 professions and is available on the Danish Immigration Service website.
There are also additional immigration schemes available, which may be relevant (eg, for trainees or intra-group secondments).
What immigration schemes are available for foreign investors and entrepreneurs wishing to invest in or establish a fintech business in your jurisdiction?
Investors or entrepreneurs from other EU, European Economic Area countries or Switzerland, may work and establish a business in Denmark under the EU rules on free movement of persons and services.
Under the Start-Up Denmark scheme entrepreneurs from countries outside of the European Union and the European Economic Area can apply for work and residence permits in Denmark. The basic conditions of the scheme are that:
- the business idea has been approved by a panel of experts appointed by the Danish Business Authority;
- the applicant can provide documentation that he or she has sufficient funds to cover his or her first year in Denmark; and
- the applicant plays an active part in running the business (ie, his or her presence must be necessary for the establishment of the business).