• PRO
  • Events
  • About Blog Popular
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
  • Resources
    • Latest updates
    • Q&A
    • In-depth
    • In-house view
    • Practical resources
    • FromCounsel New
    • Commentary
  • Resources
  • Research
    • Legal research hub
    • Primary sources
    • Scanner: regulatory tracking
    • Lexy: powerful AI search
    • Research reports
    • Explore all
  • Research
  • Learn
    • All
    • Webinars
    • Videos
  • Learn
  • Experts
    • Find experts
    • Influencers
    • Client Choice New
    • Firms
    • About
    Introducing Instruct Counsel
    The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Experts
  • My newsfeed
  • Events
  • About
  • Blog
  • Popular
  • Legal research hub
  • Primary sources
  • Scanner: regulatory tracking
  • Lexy: powerful AI search
  • Research reports
  • Explore all
  • Find experts
  • Influencers
  • Client Choice New
  • Firms
  • About
Introducing Instruct Counsel
The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you.
  • Compare
  • Topics
  • Interviews
  • Guides

Analytics

Review your content's performance and reach.

  • Analytics dashboard
  • Top articles
  • Top authors
  • Who's reading?

Content Development

Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics.

  • Trending Topics
  • Discover Content
  • Horizons
  • Ideation

Client Intelligence

Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing.

  • Track Sectors
  • Track Clients
  • Mandates
  • Discover Companies
  • Reports Centre

Competitor Intelligence

Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them.

  • Benchmarking
  • Competitor Mandates
Home

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact [email protected]

Register

Bank Negara Malaysia's Concept Papers on Corporate Governance and Shareholder Suitability

Baker McKenzie

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Malaysia May 2 2016

MEMBER FIRM OF BAKER & MCKENZIE INTERNATIONAL Financial Services and Regulation Kuala Lumpur Client Alert May 2016 Bank Negara Malaysia's Concept Papers on Corporate Governance and Shareholder Suitability Bank Negara Malaysia ("BNM") issued two concept papers in March 2016, i.e., the Concept Paper on Corporate Governance ("Corporate Governance Paper") and the Concept Paper on Shareholder Suitability on 18 March 2016 ("Shareholder Suitability Paper"). BNM is currently seeking public feedback for both papers. Whilst many of the suggestions are not new, the effect of the proposals on licensed financial institutions ("FI") and their shareholders may be far-reaching. Through the Corporate Governance Paper, BNM is seeking to instill a strong and prudent governance structure for FIs. This would entail having a board and the relevant committees that comprise predominantly of independent directors, and requiring that the corporate culture be established through a "tone from the top." Culture and remuneration are expected to be structured to reflect the long-term viability of the FIs. The Shareholder Suitability Paper on the other hand lays down the requirements that a shareholder holding 5% or more of interest in shares in a licensed FI must observe. The requirements are to be observed for so long as the person is a shareholder. Proposed corporate governance standards The Corporate Governance Paper as a whole is designed to establish a more stringent and consistent governance standard across all FIs. Executive and Independent Directors, and Common Directors The present guidelines and policy documents relating to the number of executive and independent directors on the board of FIs, currently differ amongst banks, insurers and takaful operators. For example, the current standards are as follows: Type of FI Executive Director Independent Director Banks No more than two At least ⅓ of the board members Insurers No more than 40% of the total board members Majority of the board members Takaful operators At least two If the proposals under the Corporate Governance Paper are adopted, the board of a FI must not have more than one executive director, and must have a majority of independent directors, unless BNM approves otherwise. This change will not only streamline the standard amongst FIs, but will also align it with the standards imposed on listed companies under the Listing Requirements and the recommendations under the 2012 Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance. Although a transitional period has been prescribed to comply with these requirements, we anticipate that most FIs may be in good stead to already comply since BNM has already been enforcing the standards through the ongoing appointment/re-appointments of executive or independent directors. Under the Corporate Governance Paper, an FI is required to obtain BNM's approval for the removal of independent directors and also before a resignation can take effect. This proposal will vary the requirements under the Companies Act 19651 . The requirement for prior approval of BNM to be granted before an independent director can resign also runs contrary to generally accepted market practice; i.e. a director can always resign by notice in writing to the company. We anticipate that there may be strong responses from the industry on this proposal. The proposal to restrict the number of directors who are also board members of its affiliates under the Corporate Governance Paper may be a more challenging requirement to meet. BNM has proposed that the board of FIs must not have a majority of its directors holding directorships in an affiliate. Specific examples provided by BNM are: (i) where the directors of the holding company are also directors in the FI; or (ii) where the directors of a licensed insurer are also directors of a takaful operator; or (iii) where the directors of the FI are directors of another entity within the group, which has a strong dependency on the FI. In effect, this proposal will put an end to the practice of replicating the board members within the group. During the 3-year transitional period, we anticipate that FIs will need to rationalise their board composition and identify new candidates to meet the stringent “fit and proper” test for directorships. Culture and compensation Under the Corporate Governance Paper, FIs are expected to establish a code of ethics on appropriate conduct, addressing among others, issues of confidentiality, conflicts of interest and integrity in reporting. FIs are also required to establish a whistleblowing policy that provides avenues for legitimate concerns to be reported and addressed objectively. The Corporate Governance Paper also introduces a requirement for FIs to establish a compensation policy, for directors, members of senior management and other material risk takers, which is aligned with prudent risk-taking. The compensation policy, including details relating to the total amount of compensation awards for its Chief Executive Officer and directors for the financial year, and the compensation information of senior management and other material risk takers, are to be laid before the FI’s annual general meetings and published on the FI’s website or its annual report. Broadly, this provision is also reflected under the Companies Bill 2015. Proposed changes to BNM considerations in determining shareholder suitability The Shareholder Suitability Paper provides that BNM will look more broadly and holistically at the group of companies of the shareholders when considering if there has been compliance with specific standards. Specifically, BNM will consider the circumstances of the shareholder's associate or related corporations, and their ultimate beneficial owners when considering the 1 There is a similar provision in the Companies Bill 2015. While the Companies Act 1965 is still the current legislation governing companies in Malaysia, it should be noted that the Dewan Rakyat and the Dewan Negara has each passed the Companies Bill 2015 on 4 April 2016 and 27 April 2016 respectively. The Companies Bill 2015 will have to receive the Royal Assent before it will become law, and replace the existing Companies Act 1965. shareholder's compliance of the following requirements: (i) whether a shareholder is acting or conducting its business or operations in a manner that maintains the honesty, integrity and reputation of the shareholder and the licensed person; and (ii) whether a shareholder has adequate control of its financial risks and maintain a sound financial position on a continuous basis, such that it is able to provide financial support to the FI when needed. These new considerations suggest that BNM intends to also hold shareholders of FIs responsible for indirect non-compliances with its shareholder suitability requirements caused by the shareholder's associate or related corporations and their ultimate beneficial owners. Examples of such indirect non-compliances are where the circumstances of the shareholder's associate or related corporations or their ultimate beneficial owners, (i) adversely affects or discredits the reputation or integrity of the shareholder or the FI; and (ii) affects the shareholder's financial position or ability to provide financial support to the FI when needed, and not just non-compliances by the shareholders directly. A shareholder could therefore be regarded as being “unsuitable” to hold shares in the FI, if there were transgressions by affiliates, the conduct of which the shareholder has no ability of being able to influence or control. Shareholders of FIs should take steps to ensure that its associated or related corporations, and ultimate beneficial owners are made aware of these potential new requirements imposed by BNM. This is despite the fact that it is uncertain how BNM will seek to enforce this suitability requirement on a shareholder that may not have a presence in Malaysia. Conclusion It is clear that BNM intends to enhance corporate governance standards in FIs and raise the bar as it relates to the general conduct of their shareholders. However both the Corporate Governance Paper and the Shareholder Suitability Paper are still in draft forms, subject to further review and written feedback from the public. The proposed standards and guidance set out in these papers may therefore, be subject to further changes. That said, based on previous exercises by BNM, eventual policy documents issued will largely track the original proposals under the concept papers. ©2016 Wong & Partners. All rights reserved. Wong & Partners is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. www.wongpartners.com For further information please contact: Brian Chia +603 2298 7999 [email protected] Sue Wan Wong +603 2298 7884 [email protected] Level 21, The Gardens South Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200 Kuala Lumpur

Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. For more information, please visit: www.bakermckenzie.com/en/disclaimers.

Baker McKenzie - Brian Chia and Sue Wan Wong

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Malaysia
  • Company & Commercial
  • Baker McKenzie

Topics

  • Corporate governance
  • Shareholder

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Food Law Guide - Malaysia *
  2. Amendments to the Employment Act 1955 *
  3. Taxpayer Succeeds in Stamp Duty Appeal on Transfer of Shares to Labuan Entity *
  4. The regulation of OTC derivatives in Malaysia *
  5. ASEAN Single Window and the Electronic Transmission of Form D among Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email [email protected].

Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to draft a business continuity plan (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to create a supplier code of conduct (UK)
  • Checklist Checklist: Remote working - minimising cybersecurity risks (UK)

Related research hubs

  • Shareholder
  • Corporate governance
  • Malaysia
  • Company & Commercial
Back to Top
Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Commentary
  • Q&A
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
Experts
  • Find experts
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • About Instruct Counsel
More
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Follow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2022 Law Business Research

Law Business Research