On July 26, 2013, Judge Turk entered summary judgment in the amount of $3.2 million in favor of the assignee of a note and personal guaranty. See City National Bank v. Tress (WDVa 2013). The defendants had agreed to guaranty the repayment of a note that secured commercial loans made to their LLC. The LLC, however, soon stopped making payments on the note and went into receivership. Plaintiff purchased the note and guaranty, but apparently there were problems with how the note was endorsed by the original noteholder. Defendants, therefore, argued that the personal guaranty was not enforceable since the underlying note was arguably not enforceable by plaintiff. The Court, however, ruled that under McDonald v. National Enterprises Inc., 547 S.E. 2d 204 (Va. 2001), the guaranty was an independent contract that could be enforced even if plaintiff would not have been able to enforce the note. The enforceability of the guaranty depended on whether the note had been repaid. Since the obligation on the note remained outstanding, the personal guaranty could be enforced even if plaintiff could not enforce the note itself.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact email@example.comRegister
Summary judgement for assignee of note and guaranty
Popular articles from this firm
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Related topic hubs
Vice President, General Counsel and Compliance Officer
The MMIC Group
"I LOVE this resource. Absolutely the best and most reliable single source of what’s going on that affects our business. THANKS!!"