While states have been in the forefront of legal marijuana expansion, the banking industry in New York and elsewhere is still shy about collecting revenue from a Schedule I substance that’s still illegal at the federal level.
Banking is a major hurdle for the legal medical marijuana business, lawyers say. Big banks are reluctant to get involved because of the uncertainty around federal anti-money laundering and other statutes aimed at discouraging moving illegal cash around.
Seth Goldberg, a partner at Duane Morris in Philadelphia whose practice encompasses health care, pharmaceuticals and cannabis/hemp, told the New York Law Journal recently that the “banking problem has depressed the growth” of medical marijuana in the United States, including California.
“It creates real concerns that businesses in other industries do not face, such as having to operate in cash [and] restricted access to capital,” Goldberg said, noting that legal medical marijuana companies have limited access to commercial, small business and construction loans and no daily banking services.
Because big banks are fearful of repercussions surrounding collecting revenue from an activity that is still illegal at the federal level, smaller state banks and credit unions have operated in that void. In New York, some of the companies that grow and sell medical marijuana are using state banks to house their revenue, according to people familiar with the operation, but they wouldn’t disclose which institutions they are using.
Banking in the legal marijuana sphere was largely made possible by the Obama administration, which in 2014 issued guidelines telling banks that they would not be punished if they provided services to legitimate marijuana businesses in states that have legalized the drug for medical or recreational use. The guidelines issued by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, an office within the U.S. Treasury Department, require that banks monitor their customers who are in the legal marijuana business. Though it does not grant banks immunity, it directs prosecutors to go after institutions who are not following the reporting requirements.
While banking for the legal marijuana industry has been uncertain, it was further complicated in January when Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded the so-called Cole memo, an Obama-era policy that generally kept federal law enforcement from interfering with states’ marijuana sales. The rescission of the Obama-era directive has raised questions as to whether the FinCen guidance will remain in place, said Goldberg.
“The FinCen guidance is still in place, but there is confusion given its intertwinement with the Cole [memo],” Goldberg said in an interview. “The risks and heavy reporting requirements on banks has caused very few banks to openly accept [marijuana-related business] funds.”
The FinCen did not immediately answer questions when asked what the current status of the guidelines were and whether there are plans to keep them in place. […]
Despite the restrictions, the legal marijuana industry has flourished in states such as Colorado, which received $247 million in tax and fee revenue from legal marijuana last year, according to its revenue department.
In New York, where medical marijuana became legal in 2014, the state’s program failed to gain traction in its nascent years. But the updated financial plan released by the state’s Division of the Budget shows that New York now projects $2 million in annual revenue from the 7 percent excise tax on medical marijuana sales. That figure is up from the $1 million revenue projection the state had anticipated through the 2022 fiscal year.
The New York Department of Taxation and Finance collected $1.24 million in the first nine months of the current fiscal year, which began in April 2017, meaning that the five companies authorized to grow and sell the drug in New York made sales of roughly $17.7 million.
This article originally appeared in the New York Law Journal and is republished here with permission from law.com.