The planitiff was the owner of a house. He engaged teh defendant, a contractor, to convert it from a two-storey house to a three-storey one. Disputes arose, and the plaintiff terminated the construction contract with the defendant.
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.
Questions? Please contact firstname.lastname@example.orgRegister
Lee Wee Lick Terence v Chua Say Eng  SGCA 63 (Singapore, Court of Appeal, 2 November 2012)
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email email@example.com.
Related topic hubs
Senior Corporate Lawyer
Canon Australia Pty Ltd
"I love the service. It’s a terrific time saver, very practical, very relevant, and very up-to-date. The best new legal resource I’ve come across in a long time. And free to boot! Please keep providing it."