We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

The false promise of injunction clauses

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA May 12 2009

Although injunction clauses can be an important tool on contracts governing IP rights, they are often misunderstood.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - Frederick A. Brodie and Nathaniel R. Smith
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Tagged with

  • Tool
  • Injunction
  • Article (grammar)
  • 责任

Popular articles from this firm

  1. The King and IP: A Copyright Tussle between LeBron’s Uninterrupted and the University of Alabama *
  2. The Developer’s Toolbox to Manage Risk of Future Condominium Conversion *
  3. With CDD and Beneficial Ownership Rule in Effect, FinCEN Continues to Clarify and Refine Rules for Financial Institutions *
  4. Data Protection Laws in India *
  5. Employee data privacy - an overview of employer responsibilities *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Litigation
  3. Intellectual Property

Related USA articles

  1. Selecting arbitrators for international agreements *
  2. Is Backdating Ever Okay? *
  3. When does an arbitration clause protect and when is it unconscionable? *

Related international articles

  1. Intellectual property clauses in mining services contracts * - Australia
  2. Doing IP in Germany advantages and risks of the German IP enforcement system * - China
  3. Practical completion: getting it right in the credit crunch * - United Kingdom

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions:Litigation: Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

  1. Brazil
  2. Norway
  3. Bahamas
  4. View more
Bernd Schlenther
Senior Manager: Central Risk Unit
Customs Risk Management & Intelligence Division
What our clients say

"I use the newsfeeds to follow legislative changes and industry trends relevant to my division. I find the articles to be of a good quality and the topics are well researched and presented in a very user-friendly format."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2018 Globe Business Media Group