Legal Update May 24, 2016 SEC Provides Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures It is no secret that use of non-GAAP financial measures, which are financial measures that are neither calculated nor presented in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), has been on the radar of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in recent months. In December 2015, SEC Commissioner Mary Jo White called this an area that “deserves close attention, both to make sure that our current rules are being followed and to ask whether they are sufficiently robust in light of current market practices.”1 In March 2016, The Wall Street Journal reported that Chair White told a conference of finance and business lobbyists that the SEC is looking into whether the SEC needs to rein in the current manner of use of non-GAAP financial measures by regulation.2 Wesley R. Bricker, the SEC’s deputy chief accountant, observed in a speech in May 2016 that non-GAAP financial measures are a recurring topic on which the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issues comments when reviewing SEC filings, with comments focusing “on a company’s disclosure as to why their nonGAAP measures are useful; apparent cherry picking adjustments within a non-GAAP measure; and adjustments to remove normal, cash operating expenses.”3 On May 17, 2016, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance provided new guidance on the use of non-GAAP financial measures by issuing a dozen new and updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) in this area.4 Background Regulation G permits public companies to disclose material information that includes a non-GAAP financial measure, but only if that measure, whether or not in an SEC filing, is accompanied by a presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measure and the comparable GAAP financial measure. Rule 100(b) of Regulation G prohibits the use of “a non-GAAP financial measure that, taken together with the information accompanying that measure and any other accompanying discussion of that measure, contains an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure, in light of the circumstances under which it is presented, not misleading.” Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K governs the use of non-GAAP financial measures included in SEC filings. It requires that a non-GAAP financial measure be accompanied by a presentation, of equal or greater prominence, of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, with a reconciliation to such measure. The filing must disclose the reasons why management believes that presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information to investors. Also, there must be a statement disclosing the additional purposes, if any, for 2 Mayer Brown | SEC Provides Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures which management uses the non-GAAP financial measure. Item 10(e) also contains some express prohibitions on the calculation and presentation of non-GAAP financial measures. New and Updated C&DIs on Non-GAAP Financial Measures The new and updated C&DIs provide insight into what the Division of Corporation Finance considers to be misleading use of non-GAAP financial measures and what is considered unacceptable prominence of a non-GAAP financial measure presentation. Misleading Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. The Division of Corporation Finance has added four new C&DIs addressing violations of the prohibition on misleading non-GAAP financial measures contained in Rule 100(b). C&DI 100.01 makes it clear that, even if certain adjustments are not explicitly prohibited by Regulation G, they can result in a non-GAAP financial measure that is misleading and therefore a violation of Rule 100(b). To illustrate this point, this C&DI states that the presentation of a performance measure that excludes normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate a company’s business could be misleading. The staff cross-referenced this new C&DI in C&DI 102.03, which discusses Item 10(e)’s prohibition on adjusting non-GAAP measures to eliminate or smooth out nonrecurring items that are likely to recur or have occurred within two years. C&DI 100.02 specifies that a non-GAAP measure can be misleading if it is presented inconsistently between periods, such as a measure that adjusts a particular charge or gain in the current period when other, similar charges or gains were not also adjusted in prior periods. According to this C&DI, depending on the significance of the change, it may be necessary to recast prior measures to conform to the current presentation and place the disclosure in the appropriate context. According to the staff, a non-GAAP financial measure can be misleading if it excludes charges but does not exclude gains. C&DI 100.03 notes that Rule 100(b) may be violated if a non-GAAP measure is adjusted only for non-recurring charges when non-recurring gains occurred during the same period. C&DI 100.04 addresses the presentation of a non-GAAP performance measure that is adjusted to accelerate revenue recognized ratably over time in accordance with GAAP as though it earned the revenue when customers are billed. This C&DI concludes that such a measure cannot be presented in documents filed with or furnished to the SEC or provided elsewhere, such as on a company’s website, because that type of non-GAAP measure substitutes individually tailored revenue recognition and measurement methods for GAAP methods, which could violate Rule 100(b) of Regulation G. This C&DI also specifies that other measures that use individually tailored recognition and measurement methods for financial statement line items other than revenue may also violate Rule 100(b) of Regulation G. Impermissible Prominence of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. While noting that whether a non-GAAP financial measure presentation is more prominent than the comparable GAAP measure is a question of facts and circumstances, revised C&DI 102.10 provides the following eight examples of presentations in which the staff would consider the non-GAAP disclosures to be impermissibly prominent: Presenting a full income statement of nonGAAP measures or presenting a full nonGAAP income statement when reconciling non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures; 3 Mayer Brown | SEC Provides Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures Omitting comparable GAAP measures from an earnings release headline or caption that includes non-GAAP measures; Presenting a non-GAAP measure using a style of presentation (e.g., bold, larger font) that emphasizes the non-GAAP measure over the comparable GAAP measure; A non-GAAP measure that precedes the most directly comparable GAAP measure (including in an earnings release headline or caption); Describing a non-GAAP measure as, for example, “record performance” or “exceptional” without at least an equally prominent descriptive characterization of the comparable GAAP measure; Providing tabular disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures without preceding it with an equally prominent tabular disclosure of the comparable GAAP measures or including the comparable GAAP measures in the same table; Excluding a quantitative reconciliation with respect to a forward-looking non-GAAP measure in reliance on the “unreasonable efforts” exception in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) without disclosing that fact and identifying the information that is unavailable and its probable significance in a location of equal or greater prominence; and Providing discussion and analysis of a nonGAAP measure without a similar discussion and analysis of the comparable GAAP measure in a location with equal or greater prominence. Prohibitions on Per Share Presentations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. C&DI 102.05 confirms that certain non-GAAP earnings per share measures may be permissible if they are performance measures that are reconciled to GAAP earnings per share but emphasizes that a non-GAAP liquidity measure that measures cash generated must not be presented on a per share basis in documents filed with or furnished to the SEC. The Division of Corporation Finance updated this C&DI to warn that when the staff analyzes the question of whether a financial measure can be reported on a per share basis, it will focus on the substance of whether the nonGAAP measure could be used as a liquidity measure and not management’s characterization of it solely as a performance measure. The staff clarified two other C&DIs in light of revised C&DI 102.05. The staff supplemented C&DI 102.07 to specify that free cash flow is a liquidity measure that must not be presented on a per share basis. The staff also updated C&DI 103.02, which discusses the GAAP performance measure to which EBIT or EBITDA should be reconciled, to specify that EBIT and EBITDA must not be presented on a per share basis. The revised C&DIs also address per share presentations in the context of funds from operations (FFO) per share as a non-GAAP measure in earnings releases and materials that are filed with or furnished to the SEC. C&DI 102.01 accepts the FFO definition of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) that was in effect as of May 17, 2016, as a performance measure and does not object to a per share FFO presentation when FFO is presented based on the NAREIT definition. While C&DI 102.02 recognizes that FFO can be presented other than as defined by NAREIT, adjustments for such an FFO presentation must comply with the requirements of Item 10(e) for a performance measure or a liquidity measure, and some of those adjustments may trigger the prohibition on presenting this measure on a per share basis. Income Tax Effects. Revised C&DI 102.11 specifies that companies should provide income tax effects on non-GAAP measures depending on the nature of the measures. For example, if a measure is a liquidity measure that includes income taxes, the C&DI specifies that it might be acceptable to adjust GAAP taxes to show taxes paid in cash. The C&DI indicates that if a measure is a performance measure, the company should include current and deferred 4 Mayer Brown | SEC Provides Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures income tax expense commensurate with the non-GAAP measure of profitability. C&DI 102.11 provides that adjustments to arrive at a nonGAAP measure should not be presented “net of tax.” Rather, income taxes should be shown as a separate adjustment and clearly explained. Practical Considerations The new and updated C&DIs on non-GAAP financial measures provide current guidance from the Division of Corporation Finance in an area that the SEC has previously signaled as being of concern. Therefore, public companies should review these new interpretations carefully and as soon as possible in light of both current and future use of non-GAAP financial measures. Because the new interpretations apply immediately, public companies should review their use of non-GAAP financial measures in public documents and communications to determine whether they need to make any changes to conform to the staff’s guidance and, in the case of inconsistency between periods, to consider recasting those in prior periods. If a revised approach is advisable based on any of the new or updated C&DIs, it would be helpful for the company to prepare and review revised presentations well in advance of the time they will be used. While the C&DIs reflect staff positions rather than formal SEC rule amendments, public companies should expect that the staff will be using these recent interpretations when issuing comment letters involving the use of non-GAAP financial measures. The Wall Street Journal reported that Mark Kronforst, the chief accountant of the Division of Corporation Finance, predicted an “uptick” soon in the number of SEC comments due to mounting concerns regarding non-GAAP metrics and stated that “next quarter will be a great opportunity for companies to self-correct.”5 Companies should make an effort to incorporate the guidance of the new and updated C&DIs into non-GAAP presentations that they use in their next SEC filings and earnings releases. In particular, public companies using non-GAAP financial measures should evaluate whether any of the ways they present non-GAAP financial measures (including earnings releases, investor presentations and SEC filings) could be considered misleading or having too great a prominence in light of the new staff guidance. Companies that have been providing non-GAAP financial measures on a per share basis should determine whether their presentations are consistent with the revised C&DIs on that subject. The new guidance is relevant not only to the legal team and the accounting team responsible for drafting SEC filings. Because some of the C&DI positions expressly apply to non-GAAP financial measures presented in press releases, companies should also have representatives from their public relations and investor relations departments review this new guidance. Some of the C&DI guidance relates to design elements, particularly C&DI 102.10. C&DI 102.10 not only provides guidance as to how information should be presented in the body of a press release, but in the caption as well. Therefore, all key persons involved in the preparation of earnings releases should be made aware that non-GAAP measures must not be included in a headline or caption without the comparable GAAP measure also appearing in that headline or caption and that the non-GAAP measure cannot appear before the comparable GAAP measure, including in the headline or caption of the press release. Key persons must also understand that the non-GAAP financial measure cannot be emphasized, for example, through the use of bold-face or larger font. 5 Mayer Brown | SEC Provides Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures Public companies should update their audit committees on the Division of Corporation Finance’s new positions with respect to non-GAAP financial measures presentation and the extent to which such interpretations may affect their SEC filings and earnings releases. For more information about the topics raised in this Legal Update, please contact the author, Laura D. Richman, at +1 312 701 7304, or any of the following lawyers: Laura D. Richman +1 312 701 7304 email@example.com David S. Bakst +1 212 506 2551 firstname.lastname@example.org Robert F. Gray, Jr. +1 713 238 2600 email@example.com Michael L. Hermsen +1 312 701 7960 firstname.lastname@example.org Elizabeth A. Raymond +1 312 701 7322 email@example.com Andrew J. Stanger +1 713 238 2702 firstname.lastname@example.org Endnotes 1 See Mary Jo White, “Keynote Address at the 2015 AICPA National Conference: ‘Maintaining High-Quality, Reliable Financial Reporting: A Shared and Weighty Responsibility,’” December 9, 2015, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/keynote-2015-aicpawhite.html. 2 See “SEC Signals it Could Curb Use of Adjusted Earnings Figures,” The Wall Street Journal, March 16, 2016, available at http://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-scrutinizinguse-of-non-gaap-measures-by-public-companies- 1458139473. 3 See Wesley R. Bricker, “Remarks before the 2016 Baruch College Financial Reporting Conference,” May 5, 2016, available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speechbricker-05-05-16.html. 4 Available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/nongaapi nterp.htm. 5 See “SEC Tightens Crackdown on ‘Adjusted’ Accounting Measures,” The Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2016, available at http://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-tightenscrackdown-on-adjusted-accounting-measures- 1463608923. Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization advising many of the world’s largest companies, including a significant proportion of the Fortune 100, FTSE 100, CAC 40, DAX, Hang Seng and Nikkei index companies and more than half of the world’s largest banks. Our legal services include banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute resolution; antitrust and competition; US Supreme Court and appellate matters; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services regulatory & enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual property; real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; and wealth management. Please visit our web site for comprehensive contact information for all Mayer Brown offices. www.mayerbrown.com Any advice expressed herein as to tax matters was neither written nor intended by Mayer Brown LLP to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed under US tax law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then (i) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing (by a person other than Mayer Brown LLP) of that transaction or matter, and (ii) such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. Mayer Brown comprises legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe-Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown Mexico, S.C., a sociedad civil formed under the laws of the State of Durango, Mexico; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliated with Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions. This publication provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. © 2016 The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.