We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology Newsfeed
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Awards
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
  • Newsfeed
  • Navigator
  • Hubs
  • Webinars
  • Learn
  • Store
  • Analytics
  • Insights
  • Track
  • Create
  • My Lexology
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Questions? Please contact customerservices@lexology.com

Register

Digital TV's big deadline, or delay?

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

USA January 27 2009

Consumer advocates want to push back the February 17, 2009 jump to digital broadcasting, but an extension may do more to simply postpone feared disruptions than prevent them.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pillsburylaw.com/lauren.lynch.flick">&nbsp;Lauren Lynch Flick </a>
Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linked In
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Media & Entertainment
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Tagged with

  • Delay (audio effect)
  • Digital television transition in the United States

Popular articles from this firm

  1. The King and IP: A Copyright Tussle between LeBron’s Uninterrupted and the University of Alabama *
  2. The Developer’s Toolbox to Manage Risk of Future Condominium Conversion *
  3. With CDD and Beneficial Ownership Rule in Effect, FinCEN Continues to Clarify and Refine Rules for Financial Institutions *
  4. Data Protection Laws in India *
  5. Employee data privacy - an overview of employer responsibilities *

If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com.

Send to Create
Powered by Lexology

Related topic hubs

  1. USA
  2. Media & Entertainment

Related USA articles

  1. Verizon, AT&T offer lawmakers differing views on DTV transition delay *
  2. Zeroing in on the U.S. digital one-ders: incentive auctions, cable digitization, and basic tier encryption *
  3. NPS urges adoption of digital TV predictive model *

Related international articles

  1. Global Media and Communications Quarterly - Spring 2016 * - United Kingdom
  2. Digital Britain interim report: a step in the right direction? * - United Kingdom
  3. Competition and antitrust in the digital age * - Mexico

Lexology Navigator Q&A

Compare jurisdictions:Telecoms

  1. USA
  2. Mexico
  3. Switzerland
  4. View more
Monique Boutet
Senior Corporate Lawyer
Canon Australia Pty Ltd
What our clients say

"I love the service. It’s a terrific time saver, very practical, very relevant, and very up-to-date. The best new legal resource I’ve come across in a long time. And free to boot! Please keep providing it."

Back to Top
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Compliance
  • RSS feeds
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Search
Globe Business Media Group

© Copyright 2006 - 2019 Globe Business Media Group