Recently, Shin & Kim’s labor & employment attorneys won a case on behalf of its client against store owners, who executed a reseller agreement to carry out manufacturing and sales of clothing and leather products, among others, and subsequently sold those products in the department store. The store owners claimed that they should be deemed as workers protected under the Labor Standards Act (the “LSA”), and that accordingly, severance pay must be provided.
In the court of first instance, judgment was rendered for the store owners (the “Plaintiffs”).
On appeal at the Seoul High Court, our team won a judgment against the Plaintiffs; the Court reversed the trial court’s decision, rejecting all of the claims made by the Plaintiffs.
Specifically, our lawyers were successful in persuading the appellate court to agree that the Plaintiffs were independent business operators, who created profit from delegated sales activities with no specific restrictions.
Further, based on our lawyers’ experience in handling multiple lawsuits related to the determination of whether such store owners within a department store may be considered as workers under LSA, the Shin & Kim team presented the Court with a detailed explanation on the operating system of such stores within a department store based on a reseller agreement. In effect, our lawyers argued that such an agreement between the Plaintiffs and our client company was a subcontract or an agency agreement, and not an employment agreement.
By thoroughly analyzing all evidence submitted during the litigation process and through an in-depth understanding of the actual operation of such businesses, our lawyers also proved that our client did not directly manage the store owners within the department store. Rather, the Plaintiffs concurrently operated stores of another company other than our client company, and that the Plaintiffs operated their stores at their discretion (e.g., without having specific working hours, free to make their own hiring decision).