Contract formationGood faith in negotiating
Is there an obligation to use good faith when negotiating a contract?
There is no generally recognised principle or obligation in English contract law to use good faith when negotiating a contract.
The English courts have rejected suggestions that an obligation to negotiate in good faith should be implied into a contract. It is a long-standing principle of English law that a negotiating party must be free to advance its own interest during a negotiation. Sometimes parties will include an express obligation to negotiate in good faith, but English courts usually view this as equivalent to an agreement to agree and therefore unenforceable for lack of certainty.‘Battle of the forms’ disputes
How are ‘battle of the forms’ disputes resolved in your jurisdiction?
Under English law, the general legal rule is that the courts will conclude that, unless there is any contrary evidence, the last set of terms to be provided prior to the acceptance or performance of the contract will govern the contract, namely the ‘last shot’ doctrine. A supplier often wins the battle of the forms argument as the supplier can control the sale process by ensuring that it does not agree to supply any goods or services until the buyer agrees to its terms: the supplier fires the last shot.
A supplier dealing on standard terms may incorporate a provision which stipulates that the supplier’s contract terms prevail over any terms provided by the buyer, for example:
The acceptance by [Supplier] of your order is subject to [Supplier’s] terms and conditions of sale.
Using this type of language is not an absolute guarantee that the supplier’s terms will apply although it may discourage some buyers from responding with their own terms on the basis that they are unlikely to be accepted. Such a ‘prevail clause’ will not be effective where the supplier has subsequently agreed to accept the buyer’s terms, or if the buyer expressly refuses to accept the supplier’s terms.
Where parties do business together on the same terms on a regular basis over a period of time, there may be evidence of a ‘course of dealing’ as a result of which the terms normally used by the parties will be considered the terms of their contract. This may enable a supplier to argue that their terms should apply if a buyer subsequently attempts to introduce new terms of purchase.Language requirements
Is there a legal requirement to draft the contract in the local language?
No. There is no legal requirement to draft a contract in the local language, although this is not generally an issue as the English language is often used for international contracts.Online contracts
Is it possible to agree a B2B contract online?
Yes. The general rule under English law is that a commercial contract does not need to be in any particular form to be legally binding. As long as the basic elements of a contract exist - namely offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create a legal relationship and certainty of terms - then it does not matter if a contract is made on paper or online.
The key issue when making contracts online is to ensure that the terms are properly incorporated into the contract - namely, the party accepting the terms has an opportunity to read them before accepting the contract. This can be done by having a link to the terms and conditions with a tick box to show acceptance. If the link to the terms is not opened and a party does not bother to read the terms, it is at the party’s risk and the contract will still be binding.