Sarah Latham January 27 2022 Arbitration: British Virgin Islands considers issues of enforcement upon state Ogier | Private Client & Offshore Services - British Virgin Islands Sarah Latham Private Client & Offshore Services BackgroundDecisionComment BackgroundIn December 2020, Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) obtained an ex parte order against Pakistan, Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (PIA) and various of its subsidiaries, recognising and enforcing a $6 billion International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Arbitration Award (the Award), which TCC had obtained against Pakistan (the Registration Order). TCC also sought and obtained a provisional charging order over the BVI assets of PIA, purportedly under the provisions of the BVI Charging Orders Act 2020, which – despite the contrary ex parte submission put forward by TCC – had not been brought into force.PIA owed no liability to TCC. However, TCC submitted that the effect of the 2020 Act was to enable the BVI Court to bypass the separate corporate personality of PIA, and thereby enforce against its subsidiaries. TCC further relied on the jurisdiction recognised by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in La Générale des Carrières et des Mines v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (Gécamines),(1) arguing that PIA was so closely associated with Pakistan that its assets were consequently amenable to execution in support of the Award.Decision In May 2021, following a four-day return date hearing, the BVI Commercial Division of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court set aside the Registration Order. At this inter partes hearing, the Court heard (among other things) evidence that PIA's shares were traded on an international stock exchange, and that it had a body of independent shareholders. At this hearing, the Court confirmed that the jurisdiction recognised by Gécamines could have no application to such a company, which on these facts could never be treated as "assimilated into the State for all purposes".The Court went on to find that TCC's application at the ex parte hearing was seriously deficient on several factual and legal grounds, namely:a failure to properly address the Court on questions of State Immunity and the procedural privileges afforded to a State on questions of service;that it proceeded on the basis that the 2020 Act was in force;TCC's failure to highlight the limits of the jurisdiction in Gécamines – specifically its failure to draw the Court's attention to the "strong presumption" that the separate corporate personality of PIA was to be respected; andthat TCC failed to adequately explain the evidence relevant to the improbability of a publicly traded company having "no separate effective existence."Comment The case is the first in the British Virgin Islands dealing with recognition and enforcement of an ICSID Award, the procedural requirements for service on a foreign state under the Eastern Caribbean Civil Procedure Rules following the English court decision in General Dynamics v Libya and the circumstances in which state-owned corporations can be assimilated to the state to meet the state's obligations under an arbitration award.The substantive matter is listed for an appeal in January 2022. A stay application by TCC has already been refused by an appeal panel led by Her Ladyship Dame Chief Justice Pereira.(2)For further information on this topic please contact Grant Carroll, Daniel Mitchell or Sarah Latham at Ogier by telephone (+1 284 852 7300) or email ([email protected], [email protected] or [email protected]). The Ogier website can be accessed at www.ogier.com.Endnotes (1) La Générale des Carrières et des Mines v FG Hemisphere Associates LLC  UKPC 27.(2) See BVIHCMAP2021/0014.