David.B Hennes Jaclyn Ruch Jason Freedman May 24 2017 Delaware Chancery Court applies Corwin standard and makes sale subject to business judgement rule Ropes & Gray LLP | Corporate Finance/M&A - USA David.B Hennes, Jaclyn Ruch, Jason Freedman Corporate Finance/M&A On October 12 2016 the Delaware Court of Chancery, in another application of Corwin (for further details please see "Three decisions consider effect of stockholder approval on challenged transactions"), granted the defendant board members' motion to dismiss an action by former shareholders of OM Group, Inc seeking damages following the closing of the sale of OM Group to Apollo Global Management for $1 billion.(1)Vice Chancellor Slights, following his decision in Auspex (for further details please see "Three decisions consider effect of stockholder approval on challenged transactions"), held that because an overwhelming majority of disinterested stockholders had voted to approve the merger, the business judgement rule applied, rather than enhanced scrutiny as argued by the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs had failed to allege that the transaction amounted to waste.Under Corwin the business judgement rule applies if the approval of a majority of disinterested stockholders is the product of a fully informed, uncoerced vote. However, the business judgement rule would not apply if facts were not disclosed that would have been material to a voting stockholder. The plaintiffs argued that the proxy was misleading in three material respects:It omitted information regarding a competing bid;It omitted information about a director's alleged conflicts of interest; andIt omitted information about the timing of the board's discovery of certain purported conflicts of one of the company's financial advisers and the evolution of that financial adviser's fee structure.The vice chancellor analysed each item in turn and found that none were materially misleading to stockholders and that the plaintiffs had failed to present facts that undermined the validity of the stockholder vote. Because the plaintiffs had not alleged or argued that the merger amounted to waste, the presumption of the business judgement rule resulted in the dismissal of the complaint.For further information on this topic please contact David B Hennes or Jaclyn Ruch at Ropes & Gray LLP's New York office by telephone (+1 617 951 7000) or email (email@example.com or [email protected]). Alternatively, contact Jason Freedman at Ropes & Gray LLP's San Francisco office by telephone (+1 415 315 6300) or email (j[email protected]). The Ropes & Gray website can be accessed at www.ropesgray.com.Endnotes(1) In re OM Group, Inc Stockholders Litig, CA 11216-VCS (Oct 12 2016).