USA - July 10 2013
The United States Supreme Court's term ended late last month, marking the close of a session where the Court confronted key issues in arbitration…
Asari A. Aniagolu, Timothy J. Feighery, Robert C. O'Brien
USA - April 3 2017
A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirms that policyholders have leverage to convince excess insurance carriers that they…
Eric A. Biderman, Julius A. Rousseau, III, Andrew Dykens, James M. Westerlind
USA - September 29 2016
On September 22, 2016, in a very straight forward opinion issued in response to a certified questions posed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals…
Eric A. Biderman, Julius A. Rousseau, III, Andrew Dykens, James M. Westerlind
USA - July 27 2012
In Pruco Life Ins. Co. v. Brasner, No. 10-cv-80804, slip op. (S.D. Fla. Jul. 25, 2012) (Brasner III), the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (Wells Fargo) post-trial motion for reconsideration, holding that, based on newly discovered evidence, it was entitled to a trial on the issue of whether the plaintiff, Pruco Life Insurance Company (Pruco), should be required to return premiums paid by Wells Fargo for the subject policy after Wells Fargo had acquired the policy in the secondary market.
Eric A. Biderman, Julius A. Rousseau, III, Michael S. Cryan, James M. Westerlind
USA - February 22 2013
In U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co., 2013 WL 451666, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 00784 (N.Y. Feb. 7, 2013), the New York Court of Appeals…
Eric A. Biderman, Julius A. Rousseau, III, Peter G. Mancuso, Michael S. Cryan, James M. Westerlind