Articles

Results 1 to 5 of 59


Apotex v. Sanofi; interlocutory motion re: affidavits of documents; clopidogrel

Canada - February 12 2010 Both parties brought motions for further and better affidavits of documents.

Sanofi v. Hospira, merits of a 55.2 proceeding

Canada - December 3 2009 The Court refused to grant an Order of Prohibition against Hospira regarding its docetaxel product.

AstraZeneca v. Apotex; interlocutory motion for reply evidence; esomeprazole

Canada - February 12 2010 The Court dismissed AstraZeneca's appeal from the order of a prothonotary refusing to strike parts of Apotex' evidence and refusing to permit the applicants to file reply.

Eli Lilly v. Hospira, interlocutory motion regarding further and better affidavit of documents

Canada - January 20 2010 In a case of patent infringement, the Case Management Prothonotary had ordered Hospira to produce a further and better Affidavit of Documents pursuant to an earlier motion by the Plaintiffs.

Court injects "duty of candour" requirements for patent agents

Canada - November 24 2009 In a recent decision pursuant to the NOC Regulations, the Federal Court considered s. 73(1) of the Patent Act, and held that there is a duty for patent agents to reply in good faith and make full and frank disclosure to the patent examiner.