USA - April 11 2019
On March 28, 2019, a federal court in the Southern District of New York issued a decision addressing the standard for determining whether…
Scott C. Budlong
USA - December 20 2018
The California Supreme Court declined to enforce a law firm’s engagement agreement on the basis of the agreement’s blanket advance conflict waiver…
Jacob Taber, Daniel C. Zinman
USA - August 16 2018
A recent New York City Bar opinion, N.Y. City Formal Op. 2018-5 ("Opinion 2018-5"), shocked both the investment and the legal communities by throwing…
Paul B. Haskel
USA - October 19 2010
A SEC Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") recently held that an in-house lawyer at a broker-dealer with no direct supervisory authority over a retail financial advisor was, nonetheless, that financial advisor's "supervisor" under the federal securities laws.
Daniel C. Zinman
USA - January 6 2010
Examination of US regulatory enforcement actions and criminal investigations and prosecutions in 2009 suggests that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and United States Department of Justice (DOJ) have intensified their focus on senior executives and are targeting them even in the absence of evidence of actual participation in any misconduct.
Shari A. Brandt