Articles

Results 1 to 5 of 11


Ohio Supreme Court considers manufacturers’ postmarket duty to warn consumers

USA - March 7 2017 Even before reading the slip opinion in Linert v. Foutz, Case No. 2014-1940, it becomes apparent that this was a difficult case for the Justices. The…

Sixth Circuit Underscores Importance Of Moving For A Stay After Entry Of Judgment In Foreclosure Proceedings

USA - September 29 2016 On September 9, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision that parties in foreclosure proceedings should read…

James Botti

Are you a criminal because you share your Netflix password?

USA - August 3 2016 The United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit continues to decide high profile cases that interpret the key provisions of the Computer Fraud…

Ohio federal court holds generic drug manufacturer not liable for inadequate warnings where plaintiff’s physicians did not read and rely on warnings

USA - November 17 2015 In the case Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144283 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2015), the United States District Court for the Northern…

Joyce D. Edelman, Terrance M. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court confirms that a foreclosure plaintiff may submit proof of standing subsequent to filing the complaint

USA - May 6 2015 In what most pundits agreed would be a swift reversal, the Ohio Supreme Court did in fact unanimously reverse the Ninth District Court of Appeals in…

James Botti