Articles

Results 1 to 5 of 113
Most popular |Most recent


Patent watch: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. Genentech, Inc.

USA - May 16 2013 U.S. courts have the power to enjoin parties from pursuing litigation before foreign tribunals. "[I]n evaluating a request for an anti-suit…

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

USA - May 7 2013 On May 1, 2013, in Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dyk, Prost,* O'Malley) affirmed-in-part and…

Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.

USA - June 4 2012 Where a foreign party, with the requisite knowledge and intent, employs extraterritorial means to actively induce acts of direct infringement that occur within the United States, such conduct is not categorically exempt from redress under § 271(b).

Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

USA - January 30 2013 [A] sua sponte dismissal of a complaint "is usually reserved for those cases in which the complaint is so confused, ambiguous, vague, or otherwise…

Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc.

USA - November 20 2012 [W]e have rarely held that objective evidence is sufficient to overcome a prima facie case of obviousness [but in certain cases] the objective evidence "establish[es] that an invention appearing to have been obvious in light of the prior art was not."