We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Articles

Results 1 to 4 of 4
Most popular |Most recent


California Supreme Court Sets New Deferential Standard for Supplemental CEQA Review

USA - September 28 2016 In Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo Community College District, No. S214061 (Cal. September 19, 2016), the California Supreme...

Marne S. Sussman, Norman F. Carlin.

California Supreme Court Sets New Deferential Standard for Supplemental CEQA Review

USA - September 28 2016 The “new project” versus “changed project” distinction is important because courts are deferential to lead agencies in cases challenging supplemental...

Marne S. Sussman, Norman F. Carlin.

Saving Private Partnerships: Court Upholds P3 Project against CEQA Challenge under Save Tara

USA - June 28 2016 A 2008 California Supreme Court decision, Save Tara v. City of West Hollywood, cast doubt on local governments' ability to enter into agreements with...

Norman F. Carlin.

“Reverse CEQA” Reversed- California Supreme Court Rejects CEQA Analysis of Impacts of the Environment on the Project

USA - December 21 2015 In California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (December 17, 2015) (Case No. S213478) (CBIA v. BAAQMD)...

David R. Farabee, Marne S. Sussman, Norman F. Carlin.