We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Results 1 to 5 of 27
Most popular |Most recent

California Supreme Court’s Clarification of De Minimis Doctrine Leaves Many Questions Unanswered - and Does Little to Ease Plaintiffs’ Path to Class Certification

USA - July 30 2018 On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, ostensibly clarifying the...

Michael S. Kun.

The Ninth Circuit Concludes That the Terms of Taco Bell’s On-Premises Meal Periods Comply with California Meal Period Laws

USA - July 23 2018 On July 18, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued a published opinion in Rodriguez v. Taco Bell Corp., approving Taco Bell’s on-premises meal periods for...

Michael S. Kun.

California Supreme Court Adopts “ABC Test” for Independent Contractors

USA - May 1 2018 On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, clarifying the...

Michael S. Kun.

Federal Court Concludes That 7-Eleven Franchisees Are Not Employees of 7-Eleven

USA - April 11 2018 In November 2017, four convenience store franchisees brought suit in federal court against 7-Eleven, Inc., alleging that they and all other...

Labor Issues in the Gig Economy: Federal Court Concludes That GrubHub Delivery Drivers are Independent Contractors under California Law

USA - February 13 2018 Recently, a number of proposed class and collective action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of so-called “gig economy” workers, alleging that such...

Adam S. Forman.