We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 26

Construction of inconsistent contract documents
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 30 2015

A construction contract typically comprises a set of contract conditions which are accompanied by technical documents such as the employer's


Privy Council rules on FIDIC clauses
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2015

In this newsletter we report on the recent case of NH International v National Insurance where the Privy Council ruled on the operation of certain


枢密院FIDIC 条項について判断
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2015

今回のニュースレターでは先般NH International v National Insurance 事件で下された枢密院の判断について取り上げ ますこれはFIDICレッドブック にある幾つかの条項の作用に


Construction newsletter - (number 78)
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 31 2015

An employer cannot rely upon a contractor's failure to comply with a condition precedent for commencing arbitration, if the employer's action caused


Landmark decision of English Supreme Court on penalty clauses and enforceability of liquidated damages
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 29 2016

In the recent cases of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis (2015 UKSC 67), the English Supreme Court


イングランド最高裁判所違約罰条項と損害賠償予定額の 執行可能性について重要な判決を下す
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 29 2016

イングランド最高裁判所は先般の Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi 事件 および ParkingEye Limited v Beavis 事件2015 UKSC 67判決においてイ


Fitness for purpose obligations take precedence over specification
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 30 2014

In the recent case in the English High Court of MT Hojgaard v E. ON1, it was held that a fitness for purpose obligation in a construction contract


English Court of Appeal: The valuation of omitted works should not account for any breach of contract
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 29 2014

This is the second case between MT Hojgaard AS ("MTH") and E.ON concerning the construction of the Robin Rigg East offshore wind farm in the Solway


How to terminate contracts effectively
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 19 2013

On 10th October 2013 the Technology & Construction Court, a division of the English High Court, decided the case of SABIC v PLL and SCL. The case


Recovering losses incurred in settlement of a third party claim
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 30 2011

Under the usual principles of causation, in order to be successful in its claim before a court or tribunal, the claimant has to demonstrate that there has been a breach of contract and that that breach caused the claimant loss andor damage, and has to prove the quantification of that loss