We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 36

Privy Council rules on FIDIC clauses
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2015

In this newsletter we report on the recent case of NH International v National Insurance where the Privy Council ruled on the operation of certain


枢密院FIDIC 条項について判断
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 2 2015

今回のニュースレターでは先般NH International v National Insurance 事件で下された枢密院の判断について取り上げ ますこれはFIDICレッドブック にある幾つかの条項の作用に


Enforcing DAB decisions: the Perusahaan saga continues
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Singapore
  • October 31 2014

The case of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) 2014 SGHC146 is the latest court ruling in what has become a


FIDIC dispute adjudication boards: mandatory or optional?
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Global
  • November 28 2014

Two recent cases have provided welcome guidance on the issue of whether or not the FIDIC forms of construction contracts provide that it is mandatory


Landmark decision of English Supreme Court on penalty clauses and enforceability of liquidated damages
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • February 29 2016

In the recent cases of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis (2015 UKSC 67), the English Supreme Court


Construction of inconsistent contract documents
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 30 2015

A construction contract typically comprises a set of contract conditions which are accompanied by technical documents such as the employer's


整合性に欠ける契約書類の解釈
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China
  • September 30 2015

建設契約は一般的に契約条件書一式とこれに付属する発注者要件書などの技術 書類により構成されます建設契約の一部となる各書類はそれぞれに固有の機能を 有しますがその一


English Court of Appeal: The valuation of omitted works should not account for any breach of contract
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 29 2014

This is the second case between MT Hojgaard AS ("MTH") and E.ON concerning the construction of the Robin Rigg East offshore wind farm in the Solway


How to terminate contracts effectively
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 19 2013

On 10th October 2013 the Technology & Construction Court, a division of the English High Court, decided the case of SABIC v PLL and SCL. The case


Fitness for purpose obligations take precedence over specification
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 30 2014

In the recent case in the English High Court of MT Hojgaard v E. ON1, it was held that a fitness for purpose obligation in a construction contract