We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 867

What to expect for competition and consumer law in 2017
  • PwC Australia
  • Australia
  • January 17 2017

As the Government looks to implement key reforms recommended under the Harper Review and the ACCC reflects on recent wins in the enforcement area


Australia Law Year in Review 2016 and Year to Come 2017
  • Linklaters LLP
  • Australia
  • January 5 2017

From 1 January, a new MAAL (broadly based on the first limb of the United Kingdom's Diverted Profits Tax) applies to 'significant global entities' to


Normal commercial conduct not unconscionable, says Federal Court
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • December 13 2016

In an important decision about the proper limits of "unconscionable conduct" under the Australian Competition Law, the Federal Court has found that a


ACCC fails to Mind the Gap' in unconscionable conduct case against Woolworths
  • PwC Australia
  • Australia
  • December 12 2016

The Federal Court has dismissed the ACCC's unconscionable conduct case against Woolworths


General Counsel Update - November 2016
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia, European Union, Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • November 24 2016

The outcome of the June 2016 Brexit referendum raised many significant questions of concern to business. We began our Brexit analysis 18 months before


Court clarifies when the ACCC can put your assets in the deep freeze in consumer harm cases
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • September 1 2016

Freezing orders under the ACL are to preserve assets to meet orders for compensation, but not to preserve assets to meet pecuniary penalties


You win some, you lose some
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • August 11 2016

In proceedings brought by the ACCC, the Federal Court recently found that Italian cable giant Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. (Prysmian) engaged in


Game on: ASIC hits the jackpot in the Panel in the Ainsworth matter
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia
  • July 22 2016

The Takeovers Panel accepted undertakings (relatively late in the process) from Mrs Ainsworth (a 8.96 shareholder) to, amongst other things, refrain


Game Over: Federal Court finds Valve in Breach of Australian Consumer Law
  • Addisons
  • Australia
  • July 5 2016

On 24 March 2016, Justice Edelman of the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment against American company Valve Corporation (Valve) in the


Brexit - Implications for Australian businesses
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 28 2016

On 23 June 2016, a referendum was passed in the UK for the UK to "Brexit" or exit from the European Union (EU). This will have significant