We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,264

Standing to assert false marking requires that plaintiff at least attempted to enter the market
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

Federal Circuit affirms summary judgment that plaintiff lacked standing to pursue false marking claim, holding that the plaintiff had not suffered a

California Supreme Court scrutinizes reverse payment ANDA settlements
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2015

In In Re Cipro Cases I & II, the California Supreme Court laid out a four-part rule of reason analysis for evaluating ANDA settlements that involve a

Following Actavis, California Supreme Court crafts “structured rule of reason” test for evaluating pay-for-delay settlements
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2015

Last Thursday the Supreme Court of California decided In re Cipro Cases I & II, No. S198616 (Cal. May 7, 2015), holding that reverse payment, or

Antitrust counterclaim is bifurcated and stayed
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2015

Stark, C.J. Plaintiff’s motion to bifurcate and stay antitrust counterclaim is granted. Stryker’s unopposed motion to stay pending IPR is granted

Federal Circuit rules that potential competitors may meet “competitive injury” requirement of false-marking claims
  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Digest of Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc., No. 2014-1205 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2015) (precedential). On appeal from the Western District of Virginia. Before

Reflections & Expectations
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • Asia-Pacific, Central & Eastern Europe, European Union, France, Germany, Global, USA
  • April 28 2015

Everyone is talking about cybersecurity. And why not? In the past year, cyberattacks have made headlines as never before. Major companies in a number

Is the FRAND regime due for an overhaul?
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • April 27 2015

In today's technology-heavy world, technical interoperability standards are quite common. Because those standards are often Patented, patent owners

DOJ continues to focus on FRAND negotiations
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

Citing a recent spike in litigation over fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory patent royalties as evidence that the current system is “not

DOJ’s endorsement of IEEE patent policy takes center stage at IP Antitrust conference
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On April 14 in Washington, DC, Global Competition Review hosted its Second Annual IP & Antitrust USA conference. The conference covered various hot

Supreme Court shows reluctance to overturn Brulotte’s prohibition on post-expiration royalties
  • Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2015

Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, one of the most important cases on the Court’s docket this term for