We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 672

Clarity at last: Liquidators and receivers not required to account to the ATO under s 254 without an assessment
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • December 10 2015

Today, by a majority of 3-2, the High Court of Australia in Commissioner of Taxation v Australian Building Systems Pty Ltd (in liq) 2015 HCA 48


Property and Real Estate Gazette 1st Edition
  • Carter Newell
  • Australia
  • November 30 2015

In this case note, we consider the decision of Airstrike Industrial Pty Ltd v Robertson 2013 QCATA 043 by the Appeal Tribunal of the Queensland


Wayne Danckert v Ralph Erwin Tonkin 2015 NSWSC 1570
  • Minter Ellison
  • Australia
  • November 25 2015

Existence of a binding agreement - intention of parties to be bound Significance In Wayne Danckert v Ralph Erwin Tonkin 2015 NSWSC 1570 the court


NSW legislative changes affecting residential property developers
  • Maddocks
  • Australia
  • November 12 2015

On 10 November 2015 the Conveyancing Amendment (Sunset Clauses) Bill 2015 (The Bill) was introduced into NSW Parliament. The Bill proposes to amend


Intention to be bound to a contract must be determined objectively
  • Minter Ellison
  • Australia
  • November 11 2015

Simon Moses has concluded from his analysis of the following decision that the court reaffirmed in that case that, with respect to contract formation


Statutory ‘good faith’ obligations in light of Baldwin v Icon Energy Ltd 2015 QSC 12
  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • Australia
  • August 25 2015

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Queensland (SCQ) in Baldwin & Anor v Icon Energy Ltd & Anor 2015 QSC 12 (Baldwin) confirmed that


Court of Appeal further limits scope of apportionment: this time under the ACL
  • Jackson McDonald
  • Australia
  • July 2 2015

A unanimous Court of Appeal made the obiter dicta observation that the only cause of action that is apportionable under the Australian Consumer Law


Date for assessment of vendor's damages and receivers and managers? Costs liability
  • HopgoodGanim
  • Australia
  • June 18 2015

This decision by the New South Wales Court of Appeal discusses the proper measure of a vendor’s damages under a contract for the sale of land where


계약 위반(non-compliance)에 따른 손해배상금 산정에 대한 최근 판례
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia, South Korea
  • April 23 2015

공사 결함에 따른 계약 위반의 일차적인 구제는 건물을 철거한 후 다시 짓는 것입니다. 그러나 Bellgrove v Eldridge 에서 Dixon CJ는 ‘시정 작업들이 계약에 부합하는 결과를 만들어 내기 위하여 반드시 필요해야 할 뿐만 아니라, 합리적이어야


RK property insights March 2015
  • Russell Kennedy
  • Australia
  • March 20 2015

The Government is seeking views on proposed reforms to strengthen Australia's foreign investment framework, particularly around residential real