We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,289

Top three construction cases: May 2016
  • Eversheds LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 19 2016

In Stellite Construction Limited v Vascroft Contractors Limited 2016 EWHC 792 (TCC), Carr J in the Technology and Construction Court severed part

Shall means shall, may means may, but an option can be exercised in several ways
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • United Kingdom
  • May 13 2016

Shareholders to JV agree that “any party may submit the dispute to binding arbitration”. Shareholders then get into a dispute, end up in Court and

Contract clauses stopping oral variations don’t work?
  • Wigley + Company
  • New Zealand, United Kingdom
  • May 12 2016

Contracts for complex supplies, such as software and outsourcing agreements, often contain an anti-oral variation clause, so that all changes must be

6 months on: Consumer Rights Act - Damp squib or calm before the storm?
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • May 9 2016

It has now been six months since the principal provisions of the Consumer Rights Act (the Act) came into force on 1 October 2015. The Act set out a

Foreign arbitration awards: Enforcement v public policy
  • Walker Morris LLP
  • Switzerland, United Kingdom
  • May 9 2016

Print publication In Pencil Hill Limited v US Citta Di Palermo S.p.A , the High Court considered whether a Swiss arbitration award should be

Long-term supply (and off-take) agreements: some recent themes
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 29 2016

The long-term supply (or off-take) agreement (“LTSA”) should not have too many ‘open ended’ provisions that require further agreements between the

Want to Change the Terms of Your Contract Over the Telephone, but the Contract Says It Has to Be Done in Writing? Well It Doesn't
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • April 27 2016

The English Court of Appeal last week handed down an important judgment. In Globe Motors, Inc and others v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Limited

Brexit: A Disputes Perspective
  • Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 19 2016

Much has been written about the issues the UK will face as a country if the majority vote to leave the EU at the referendum on 23 June. However

Brexit: The possible legal implications of a UK withdrawal from the EU
  • Bond Dickinson LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 14 2016

On 23 June 2016 the British people will vote on whether the UK should remain a member of the EU or leave the EU.As our clients would expect, Bond

Contentious Commentary - April 2016
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Portugal, United Kingdom
  • April 11 2016

The ISDA Master Agreement applies to derivatives transactions in, generally, one of two ways. First, by the parties entering into a long-form