We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,093

Appeal allowed- 25 June 2015
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • June 26 2015

The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), 2013 QCCA 868, was heard on March 18, 2015 and the Court on that day


Applications for leave to appeal dismissed - 25 June 2015
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • June 26 2015

On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia. The applicant, Ms. Maguire, opposed the development of a composting facility by the


Commonality is key: class proceeding certification denied
  • McMillan LLP
  • Canada
  • June 25 2015

The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in Marshall v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnerships, upheld a chambers judge's decision denying


When must a plaintiff sue for corporate oppression?
  • Torkin Manes LLP
  • Canada
  • June 23 2015

The Ontario Superior Court has held that a legal action for corporate oppression must be started within two years of the date it was discovered


L’offrant déçu est-il désormais dans une meilleure position ? Bloom Lake, G.P.L. (Arrangement Relatif à), 2015 QCCS 1920
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • June 19 2015

En mai 2010, le juge Gascon, alors qu’il siégeait à la Cour supérieure du Québec, a rendu une décision importante dans l’affaire Abitibibowater Inc


Pick your poison: the Court of Appeal clarifies the distinction between the oppression remedy and the derivative action
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • June 10 2015

On May 26, 2015, the Ontario Court of Appeal issued its decision in Rea et al v Wildeboer (“Wildeboer”). The decision clarifies the nature, purpose


Lack of commonality precludes consumer class certification says B.C. Court of Appeal
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 10 2015

In Marshall v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership, a unanimous division of the British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's


B.C. Court of Appeal affirms refusal to certify Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act claims
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • June 9 2015

On June 3, 2015, in Marshall v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership (Marshall), the B.C. Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal


Can the director of a corporation be held personally liable for unpaid wages and termination pay?
  • Torkin Manes LLP
  • Canada
  • June 5 2015

The Ontario Superior Court has held that the director of a closely-held corporation can be held liable for unpaid wages and termination pay under the


“A mirage of judicial economy” BCSC applies a more rigorous preferability analysis
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • June 4 2015

Mr. Justice Funt has refused to certify Vaugeois v. Budget Rent-A-Car of BC Ltd., 2015 BCSC 802 on the basis of preferability. This is a welcome