We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 43

Alberta Residential Corp. v. Certain Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Authority Agreement No. YF091589
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 21 2015

Condominum policy insuring against damage to common property and units within the building covers water damage necessitating repairs to interior


MacDonald v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 19 2016

The insureds had obtained title insurance in connection with the purchase of their family home. Seven years after aquiring their home, the insureds


Choukair v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • October 20 2015

An insurer was obligated to pay for the increased cost of repairs due to the additional work required under the Building Code. The relevant exclusion


Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Robinson v. Primmum Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 21 2014

Pollution exclusion in homeowner's policy may not apply to circumstances where sound insulation releases noxious gas that renders the home


MacDonald v. Chicago Title Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 17 2015

The applicant homeowners' summary judgment application brought against their title insurer for breach of contract and breach of good faith was


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Jomaa v. Jomaa
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds