We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 51

Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage


Mississippi River Power Corp. v. Municipal Electric Assn. Reciprocal Insurance Exchange
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 15 2014

Reasonable preventative measures taken by an insured to prevent probable future damages may not be recoverable where the policy excludes coverage for


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Robinson v. Primmum Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 21 2014

Pollution exclusion in homeowner's policy may not apply to circumstances where sound insulation releases noxious gas that renders the home


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property


Coleman v. Great American Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 23 2011

On September 1, 2006, Oldaker commenced action No. S065653 against the Insureds and others for, amongst other things, breach of duty to properly manage and administer a condominium common property and to promptly repair and maintain that property (the "Underlying Action"


Jamfamco Investments Ltd. v. Intact Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 12 2010

The applicant, Aviva Canada Inc., brought an application seeking a declaration that the respondent, Intact Insurance Company of Canada, was required to defend and indemnify Jamfamco Investments Ltd. and its principal, John A. Macdonald, in a civil action brought against them and their subcontractor, Murphy, in relation to alleged deficiencies in a log home constructed by them in 1990


Minox Equities Ltd. v. Sovereign General Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 30 2010

The insured owned a housing complex, for which it purchased a broad-form, all-risk policy of insurance from Sovereign-General Insuance Co. between 1993 and 2003