We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,050

Examples of Ambiguities in Spatially Limited Assignments
  • Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
  • USA
  • September 21 2016

The August installment, Vertical Assignments, discussed Plano Petroleum, LLC v. GHK Exploration, L.P., 250 P.3d (Okla. 2011) as an illustration of the

NC Politics in the News
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2016

McGuireWoods Consulting is pleased to announce that D. Bowen “Bo” Heath will become the new group leader of the North Carolina state government

Pipeline Companies Win Key Battles in War for Eminent Domain Rights
  • Roetzel & Andress
  • USA
  • September 19 2016

On September 12, 2016, Ohio's Ninth District Court of Appeals in Akron decided the case of Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC v. Donald R. Houston, et al

District Court Rejects Petition for Preliminary Injunction to Stop Dakota Access Pipeline, Triggering Forceful Response by Federal Government
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 15 2016

On September 9, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion for a Preliminary Injunction against the U.S. Army Corps of

Ohio Supreme Court to Decide Future (and Past) of Ohio’s Dormant Mineral Act
  • Kegler Brown Hill + Ritter
  • USA
  • August 30 2016

Of the many oil and gas disputes pending before the Ohio Supreme Court, some of the most interesting involve the interplay of the notice and vesting

Texas Supreme Court clarifies private nuisance law
  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • USA
  • August 22 2016

On June 24 2016 the Texas Supreme Court attempted to clarify private nuisance law in Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, LP v Gardiner. In the 54-page

Characterisation of prospecting activities in NSW
  • McCullough Robertson
  • Australia
  • August 22 2016

The Land and Environment Court’s recent decision in the case of People for the Plains Incorporated v Santos NSW (Eastern) Pty Limited and Ors 2016

California’s One Action Rule: A Cautionary Tale for Energy Lenders
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • August 22 2016

It may be surprising to some that the state of California ranks third in the nation in crude oil production, behind only Texas and North Dakota

BLM’s Hydraulic Fracturing Rule Applicable to Indian Lands Is Back in PlayFor Now
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • August 11 2016

In two articles appearing in Modrall Sperling’s companion newsletter, Energy Resources Notes, we reported first on the substantive provisions of

Supreme Court is alive alive-o to the possibility of variable prescriptive rights
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 9 2016

The recent case of Lynn Shellfish Ltd and others v. Loose and others 2016 UKSC has seen the Supreme Court take a practical approach to the law of