We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,002

Characterisation of prospecting activities in NSW
  • McCullough Robertson
  • Australia
  • August 22 2016

The Land and Environment Court’s recent decision in the case of People for the Plains Incorporated v Santos NSW (Eastern) Pty Limited and Ors 2016

California’s One Action Rule: A Cautionary Tale for Energy Lenders
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • August 22 2016

It may be surprising to some that the state of California ranks third in the nation in crude oil production, behind only Texas and North Dakota

Texas Supreme Court clarifies private nuisance law
  • Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
  • USA
  • August 22 2016

On June 24 2016 the Texas Supreme Court attempted to clarify private nuisance law in Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, LP v Gardiner. In the 54-page

BLM’s Hydraulic Fracturing Rule Applicable to Indian Lands Is Back in PlayFor Now
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • August 11 2016

In two articles appearing in Modrall Sperling’s companion newsletter, Energy Resources Notes, we reported first on the substantive provisions of

Supreme Court is alive alive-o to the possibility of variable prescriptive rights
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • August 9 2016

The recent case of Lynn Shellfish Ltd and others v. Loose and others 2016 UKSC has seen the Supreme Court take a practical approach to the law of

The New Dominance of Groundwater (When Oil and Water Mix)
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • August 2 2016

There has been an increasing focus on the rights relating to the ownership and use of groundwater in Texas as the demands for water increase

Actualidad Normativa N.º 16 (2016)
  • Gómez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
  • European Union, Spain
  • July 28 2016

El Reglamento (UE) 2016646 de la Comisión, de 20 de abril del 2016, por el que se modifica el Reglamento (CE) núm. 6922008 en lo que con cierne a

Miller v. Cloud
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • July 25 2016

In a recent decision, Miller v. Cloud (July 22, 2016), Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals concluded that an estate intended to transfer its

Nuisance is a Legal Injury, Not a Cause of Action - A Waltz Across Texas Nuisance Law
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2016

In Crosstex North Texas Pipeline v. Gardiner, issued June 24, 2016, the Texas Supreme Court considered a noise nuisance claim involving a natural gas

California’s Precondemnation Right of Entry Statutes Upheld With a Slight Judicial Tweak
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • July 21 2016

For the last two-plus years, we have been waiting for guidance from the California Supreme Court on whether public agencies could utilize the