We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 16,600

Publically traded companies beware: an SEC filing can be evidence of an adverse employment action in a claim of retaliation
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2015

A Title VII plaintiff can prove retaliation using either the direct or indirect method. Under the direct method a plaintiff must prove (1) that she


Stanford receiver wins first fraudulent transfer jury trial
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2015

In the Northern District of Texas, in mid-February, a jury handed down the first verdict in a fraudulent transfer case arising from the Robert Allen


Top ten international anti-corruption developments for February 2015
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • Australia, Brazil, Canada, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 5 2015

This installment of MoFo's Top Ten International Anti-Corruption Developments highlights a number of significant domestic and global anti-corruption


The Second Circuit Court of Appeals declines the invitation to establish a bright-line rule barring foreign-cubed securities lawsuits
  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2008

As the securities markets have expanded globally, investors are increasingly seeing their investments as part of a larger, international market


Sale of stock in restaurant did not support federal securities fraud claims
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • November 14 2008

Plaintiffs, the purchasers of all the shares of stock in Chef Vincent, Inc., a corporation created to own, operate and manage Chef Vincent, a restaurant located in Miami, Florida, asserted claims against the defendant-seller under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act) and Rule 10(b)-5


Recent cases on securities law
  • Wilk Auslander LLP
  • USA
  • October 28 2008

Under the 1995 amendments to the federal securities laws, a plaintiff in a securities fraud action is required to allege "with particularity facts giving rise to a strong interference that the defendant acted" with scienter - intent to deceive


Fifth Circuit confirms that identifying whistleblower to co-workers can be an adverse action under SOX
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

In Halliburton, Inc. v. Administrative Review Board, 771 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2014), the Fifth Circuit upheld an ARB ruling that the identification of


Courts continue to disagree regarding whether the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation whistleblower provisions require report to the SEC
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

Whether a whistleblower must report complaints to the SEC in order to be a "whistleblower" for purposes of the Dodd-Frank Act anti-retaliation


Five issues in executive disputes to watch in 2015
  • Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
  • USA
  • January 2 2015

In our last post, we counted down our most popular posts of 2014, from A-Rod to Walgreen. Now it's time to take a look at the issues in executive


Administrative Review Board clarifies burden-shifting framework for SOX whistleblower claims
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

In Fordham v. Fannie Mae, Administrative Review Board (ARB) No. 12-061 (Oct. 9, 2014), the ARB issued an opinion that could have significant