We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 72

Court enters preliminary injunction against SEC administrative proceeding
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2015

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, has entered a preliminary injunction preventing the SEC from


SEC to appeal preliminary injunction blocking administrative proceeding
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2015

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, entered a preliminary injunction preventing the SEC from


SEC has no plans to change the way administrative judges are appointed (for now)
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2015

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, entered a preliminary injunction preventing the SEC from


Supreme Court interprets Sarbanes-Oxley evidence destruction provisions
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

We now know that Sarbanes-Oxley does not apply to fish . . . While conducting an offshore inspection of a commercial fishing vessel in the Gulf of


Court says there is no private cause of action to create an SEC whistleblower award
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2015

AgFeed Industries, Inc.'s accounting irregularities culminated in a March 2014 enforcement action brought against AgFeed by the SEC. The enforcement


Third Circuit issues decision in Wal-Mart case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2015

The Third Circuit has issued its decision in the case of Trinity Wall Street v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. To try and put it simply, Wal-Mart argued


U.S. brings criminal charges for false Sarbanes-Oxley certifications
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • March 27 2014

An indictment was recently unsealed where the United States recently brought criminal charges, for among other things, false certifications under


Court notes Form 8-K is not the exclusive source of disclosure obligations
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2014

In re Hi-Crush Partners L.P. Securities Litigation (2013 WL 6233561 (S.D.N.Y.) (December 2013) examines the interplay between Form 8-K triggering


Conflict minerals and resource extraction challenges proceed on accelerated basis
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2013

We previously noted that the challenge to the SEC's conflict minerals rules was transferred from the Court of Appeals to the United States District


NAM motion for emergency stay denied in conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has issued a per curiam order denying NAM's motion for an emergency stay of the