We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 73

SEC sued to implement resource extraction rules
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2014

On July 2, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the SEC's resource extraction rules which were mandated by the


3rd Circuit holds Dodd-Frank retaliation claim subject to arbitration
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2014

In Khazin v. TD Ameritrade the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that securities-related retaliation claims brought under


Panel to rehear conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has granted the petition for a panel rehearing (as opposed to an en banc rehearing


NAM says no need for en banc rehearing in conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2014

Earlier, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ordered the appellants in the conflict minerals case, NAM et al, to


Private companies can have SOX whistleblowers too
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • March 5 2014

Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, codified at 18 U.SC. 1514A provides in part that: "No public company . . . , or any officer, employee


Amnesty International continues to push for en banc rehearing in conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2014

Amnesty International has filed a supplemental brief which continues to advocate for a rehearing en banc in the conflict minerals case. The argument


Court notes Form 8-K is not the exclusive source of disclosure obligations
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2014

In re Hi-Crush Partners L.P. Securities Litigation (2013 WL 6233561 (S.D.N.Y.) (December 2013) examines the interplay between Form 8-K triggering


SEC seeks rehearing of conflicts minerals decision
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2014

The SEC has filed documentation with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals seeking an en bancrehearing of the conflict minerals decision. The


NAM motion for emergency stay denied in conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has issued a per curiam order denying NAM's motion for an emergency stay of the


Hedge fund and its partner and lawyer fail on motion to dismiss for breach of fiduciary duty
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • October 5 2014

A case against a hedge fund, and one of its partners and in-house counsel, related to actions at a portfolio company and alleging breach of fiduciary