We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 76

NAM files court motion for stay of conflict minerals rules
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2014

NAM et al have filed an emergency motion for stay with the Court of Appeals in the conflict minerals case. As predicted, it is largely a replay of


Court schedules briefing in conflict minerals emergency stay motion
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2014

NAM et al's original motion for an emergency stay in the conflict minerals case requested a decision by May 26, 2014, just ahead of the filing


Conflict minerals and resource extraction challenges proceed on accelerated basis
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2013

We previously noted that the challenge to the SEC's conflict minerals rules was transferred from the Court of Appeals to the United States District


SEC response to NAM motion for stay of conflict minerals rules
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2014

I hope NAM et al are successful in their motion for a stay of the conflict minerals rules, but it certainly isn't a slam dunk. The SEC has filed its


Whistleblower not entitled to jury trial
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • November 13 2013

In Pruett v BlueLinx Holdings, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (1:13-cv-02607), the court held


Court upholds SEC conflict minerals rule
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2013

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia has upheld the SEC's conflict minerals rule in National Association of Manufacturers et


Court invalidates conflict minerals rule because it crosses First Amendment line
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2014

In the end, it's pretty simple. The court held the conflicts minerals rule and statute embodied in Dodd-Frank violate the First Amendment to the


Mandate withheld in conflicts minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2014

In a little known action, the Clerk of Court of the Unites States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued an order in the conflicts


Whistleblower doesn’t have to report to SEC for Dodd-Frank protection
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2014

In Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2014), the court held the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation statute does not clearly and unambiguously limit


NAM 's next move in conflict minerals case
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2014

Now that NAM et al's emergency stay motion in the conflicts minerals case has been denied, the question is what happens next. Clues can be found in