We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 2,760

Blocking injunctions for ISPs whose services are being used by website operators to sell infringing goods
  • Marks & Clerk
  • United Kingdom
  • July 20 2016

The UK's Court of Appeal recently confirmed that UK brand owners can take action against internet service providers (ISPs) whose services are being


Trademarks?: Hashtags as Trademarks Revisited
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2016

Since our previous article on the emerging issue of trademark rights in hashtags, the use of hashtags in social media marketing has continued to grow


ISPs' appeal is "blocked"
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2016

In a judgment handed down today, the Court of Appeal, led by Lord Justice Kitchin, has overwhelmingly rejected the appeal by the five largest ISPs


Following Orders: Court of Appeal upholds the right to blocking orders in counterfeit goods cases
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2016

Today, the Court of Appeal has handed down its much anticipated decision in the case of Cartier International AG and others v British Sky


Cartier International and others vs BskyB and others - Court of Appeal upholds site-blocking injunction for brand owners
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2016

The Court of Appeal handed down its decision today in Cartier International and Others vs BSkyB and others 2016 EWCA Civ 658. The Courtupheld the


Blokker: hot or not?
  • Taylor Wessing
  • Netherlands
  • July 4 2016

Op 20 April jl. oordeelde de Rechtbank Amsterdam dat de reclame hiernaast geen inbreuk maakt op de Benelux merken van winkelketen Blokker en ook geen


Asia: Can’t grab a .taxi?
  • Hogan Lovells
  • Global
  • July 1 2016

In a dispute before the Kuala Lumpur office of the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre, the Panel allowed the transfer of the domain name


Law Firm’s Suit against Partner over Domain Name Highlights Essential Control of Proper Registration
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • June 30 2016

Partners in a business rarely title real property in the name of one individual partner. Businesses do not let employees title bank accounts for the


Tweets Don’t Fly as Independent Services
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • June 24 2016

Florists' Transworld Delivery's (FTD) intent-to-use application to register the mark SAY IT YOUR WAY was refused on the ground that FTD failed to


Temporarily Confused: Exploring Initial Interest Confusion
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • June 9 2016

Last year, Canadian Courts rendered two decisions discussing the doctrine of initial interest confusion. The doctrine originated in U.S. trademark law