We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,122

Bigfoot Internet Ventures Pte. Ltd. v Apple Inc. 2017 SGIPOS 4
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Singapore
  • March 23 2017

BIGFOOT INTERNET VENTURES PTE. LTD. (Applicant), a wholly-owned international investment subsidiary of the Bigfoot Group of Companies, applied to


Asia IP & TMT: Quarterly Review - First Quarter 2017
  • Mayer Brown JSM
  • China, Hong Kong
  • March 23 2017

Michael Jordan, the legendary NBA star, has finally established his rights in his Chinese name after 5 years of intensive administrative and appeal


Insights: The battle for ARGOS online: Google advertising and website targeting revisited
  • Boult Wade Tennant
  • United Kingdom
  • March 23 2017

The High Court decision of 15 February 2017 in a dispute between UK retail giant, Argos Limited (“Argos UK”), and American software company, Argos


最新商标指导案例丨歌力思案面对恶意注册的侵权抗辩与确权救济
  • Wan Hui Da - Peksung IP Group
  • China
  • March 23 2017

最高人民法院于2017年3月9日发布了第16批共10件指导性案例


Le Conseil d’Etat confirme que le nom de domaine constitue un élément incorporel de l’actif immobilisé de l’entreprise
  • Nomos
  • France
  • March 22 2017

Le Conseil d’Etat a récemment rendu un arrêt attendu dans lequel il transpose aux noms de domaine sur internet la jurisprudence Sife


Keyword ads Only infringing if they’re confusing
  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • March 22 2017

Neighbors can be helpful. Our Canadian neighbors may have just helped U.S. trademark owners who wonder about the legality of use of their trademarks


Fashion Law - March 2017
  • K&L Gates
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom
  • March 22 2017

The fashion industry is undoubtedly fast paced and the retail conditions are challenging. Businesses in all industries are looking at new ways of


Don’t argos.com it, argos.co.uk it
  • Stobbs IP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 20 2017

Some have said that Argos’ recent defeat was karma for its much-maligned Richard E. Grant adverts, others may feel that it was a curse placed on it by


Alibaba Says “Close Sesame”: C.D. Cal. Finds No Liability When “Online” Mall Provides a Search Engine Allowing Consumers to Search for Plaintiff’s Products Within its Online Marketplace
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2017

Courts continue to show reluctance to permit trademark claims to hamper the sale of products via the Internet absent concrete evidence of actual


Google AdSense issue considered by the High Court for the first time
  • Michelmores LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 17 2017

The High Court has considered trade mark infringementpassing off in the context of Google AdSense for the first time. Google AdSense offers website