We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 99

Preliminary injunction partially entered in trademark suit
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2013

Judge Kapala granted the agreed portions of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction in this trademark case involving plaintiff’s 21ST CENTURY


Secondary Considerations Cannot Save Functional Trade Dress
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 28 2016

LoggerHead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holding Corp., No. 12 C 9033, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Sep. 20, 2016) (Darrah, J.). Judge Darrah granted defendants summary


Inadvertent use of mark violates consent order
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2013

Judge Bucklo granted plaintiff Gaither Tool’s motion to enforce the parties’ Consent Order which required that defendant Summit Tool not use the


Allegations of Trademark Use with Illegal Drugs Support Trademark Cancellation Claim
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2017

Judge Bucklo granted in part defendant HBI’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Republic’s trademark cancellation claim


Limiting interrogatory language allows limited response
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2014

Judge St. Eve granted in part defendant Electro Power’s motion to compel further interrogatory responses and denied Electro Power’s motion to compel


Court spares third-party service providers from contributory trademark infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2014

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a new


Descriptive trademark does not survive summary judgment
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 16 2014

The Court granted summary judgment for defendant in this Lanham Act case involving alleged trademark infringement regarding plaintiff’s BOX PACKAGING


Third-party service providers not liable for contributory trademark infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2013

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a


“Look and feel” of a website can constitute protectable trade dress
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2014

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Ingrid & Isabel, LLC v. Baby Be Mine, LLC, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2014 WL


Social media alone does not create personal jurisdiction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2014

Judge Dow granted defendant WoundRight Technologies’ (“WoundRight”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in