We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 91

Temporary restraining order to prevent competing, identical sales
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

Venus Labs., Inc. dba Earth Friendly Prods. V. Vlahakis, No. 15 C 1617, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 5, 2015) (Blakey, J.). Judge Blakey granted


Fair use & likelihood of confusion doom Lanham Act claims
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

Judge Kapala granted defendant WD-40 summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s Lanham Act and related state law claims regarding Plaintiff’s THE INHIBITOR


Unrebutted local Rule 56.1 statement leads to summary judgment
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

7-Eleven, Inc


Court spares third-party service providers from contributory trademark infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2014

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a new


Third-party service providers not liable for contributory trademark infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2013

Trademark owners frustrated by cybersquatting will not be able to sue third-party service providers for contributory infringement, according to a


Damages awarded on Lanham Act default judgment
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

Judge Zagel awarded damages in this Lanham Act case after he and Judge Conlon entered default judgment against the defendants. Pursuant to its


Descriptive trademark does not survive summary judgment
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 16 2014

The Court granted summary judgment for defendant in this Lanham Act case involving alleged trademark infringement regarding plaintiff’s BOX PACKAGING


Domain name squatting to gain leverage can trigger "bad faith intent" in an ACPA claim
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2014

A required element to sustain a claim under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection (ACPA) (15 U.S.C. 1125(d)(1)(A)) is proof that the


Court Will Not Allow Expansion of Plaintiff’s Claims at Summary Judgment Stage
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 10 2016

Judge Darrah granted defendant Sears’ summary judgment motion regarding Lanham Act and related state law claims directed to Sears’ internet activity


No irreparable harm where plaintiff delays seeking injunction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2014

Judge Der-Yeghiayan denied plaintiff Real-Time Reporters’ (“RTR”) preliminary injunction motion in this Lanham Act matter involving RTR’s REAL-TIME