We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,689

Singhsbury’s and Morrisinghs: harmless fun or flagrant infringement?
  • Stobbs IP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 3 2017

When brand-related commercial disputes are publicised in our media, typically the media sympathises with the underdog, rightly or wrongly


The Importance of Brand Clearance: How About “COVFEFE” As a Brand? Part 2
  • Wolters Kluwer Corsearch
  • Global, United Kingdom, USA
  • July 3 2017

In our last installment, we put a critical eye to COVFEFE as a potential brand and attempted to deconstruct it in terms of potential meaning. In this


When does third party use of a trade mark cross the line from informative to misleading?
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 30 2017

In its ruling in Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Technosport London Ltd and George Agyeton, the Court of Appeal has provided clear guidance on the


Bentley to loose
  • Chiever
  • United Kingdom
  • June 28 2017

The UK trademark authorities have ruled that luxury car-maker Bentley can’t stop the eponymous Bentley Clothing firm from selling its Bentley brand in


Protecting software and apps
  • Charles Russell Speechlys
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 28 2017

We are regularly asked to provide advice on how to protect a computer program. This can take several forms, such as new computer game, software for


Bentley verliest
  • Chiever
  • United Kingdom
  • June 28 2017

Autofabrikant Bentley kan in Engeland het gelijknamige kledingmerk Bentley van het bedrijf Bentley Clothing niet stoppen. Dat heeft het Engelse


No protection in sight for Berkshire Eye Clinic
  • Stobbs IP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 27 2017

There were tears for the Berkshire Eye Clinic recently when the UKIPO refused its application for THE BERKSHIRE EYE CLINIC on the basis that the mark


Up in a puff of smoke: tobacco company loses a trademark due to non-use
  • Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 27 2017

This month the EU General Court dismissed a tobacco company’s appeal against the European Union Intellectual Property Office's (EUIPO) decision to


If it looks like a KitKat why perception alone isn’t enough for shape trade marks
  • Burges Salmon LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 26 2017

The legal battle between Cadbury and Nestlé over Nestlé’s KitKat is a well-known and long-running dispute that has been extensively covered in the


The KitKat case: To protect or not to protect: The fine lines
  • AA Thornton & Co
  • United Kingdom
  • June 23 2017

In the recent judgement in the case of Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA vs Cadbury UK Ltd 2017 EWCA Civ 358, handed down a few weeks ago by the