We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 2,264

What's in a name? Karen Millen loses battle to use her own name in business
  • Farrer & Co LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 20 2016

Business owners should bear the case in mind when considering how to protect their brands, particularly where they trade under a name they hold dear

Forfar Bridies and intellectual property
  • Brodies LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 16 2016

Two local Forfar bakers have come together as the Forfar Bridie Producer Association to apply for a protected geographical indication (PGI) for the

Satellite Bulletin: Consequences of Brexit - 31 August 2016
  • Bird & Bird
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 9 2016

There are opportunities and risks for all companies in relation to the UK's future relationship with the EU. This Bulletin covers, In Brief, a range

Battle of the Brands: £20.2 million settlement reached
  • Boodle Hatfield
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 8 2016

UK online fashion superstore ASOS has been forced to pay £20.2 million over alleged trademark infringements to two rival European retailers -

Brexit: Trademark Law and What to Watch For - Part 11
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 7 2016

Womble Carlyle attorneys, Jeff Hay and Ted Claypoole discuss whether or not the unitary property right system will continue to apply in the UK after

Cutting Edge or a Fashion Faux Pas? Branding and Outrage
  • Barker Brettell LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 2 2016

Fashion is a field that prides itself on being cutting edge or avant-garde, particularly at the level of the catwalk. The desire and need for

Should’ve seen it coming - Specsavers applies to register “should’ve” as a trademark
  • Paris Smith LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 1 2016

The phrase “should’ve gone to Specsavers” is now synonymous with the international optometrist chain Specsavers so it comes as no surprise that the

United Kingdom: Comparative advertising and enforcement in the United Kingdom
  • Marks & Clerk Solicitors LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • September 1 2016

IP law is pervaded by a tension between, on the one hand, protecting individuals and companies from those who seek to take unfair advantage of their

Brexit: impact on brands and borders
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 1 2016

Brexit means a new border will exist between the UK and the European Union (EU), but what will this mean for brand owners? Will you be able to prevent

High Court grants another order requiring ISPs to block websites infringing trade marks
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • August 31 2016

In the recent case of Cartier and Another v British Telecommunications and Others 2016 EWHC 339 (Ch) ("Cartier II"), HHJ Hacon handed down