We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 121

..and don’t even think about advertising a MARCH MADNESS event either!
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 17 2015

It is that time of year again, coming off St. Patrick's Day celebrations, when everyone gets on the college basketball bandwagon in the season of


Bayer given a headache by trial court decision in FLANAX US trademark dispute
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

On February 6, 2015, a US District Court issued a ruling which underscores the territorial nature of trademark rights and the need to seek formal


The court’s decision in the FLANAX US trademark dispute gives Bayer a headache
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

On February 6, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's ruling in


Use it or lose it: when can a trademark registered under Section 44(e) or 66(a) be deemed “abandoned” in the US?
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • February 3 2015

Unlike most countries, US trademark law generally requires that a mark be in use before it can be protected. The US recognizes common law rights in


Don’t even think about advertising a SUPER BOWL party!
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 26 2015

As we all know, Super Bowl XLIX will be played this Sunday in Phoenix, Arizona between the defending Champion Seattle Seahawks and the New England


The US Supreme Court holds that juries should decide the issue of trademark tacking
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 21 2015

In the first substantive trademark decision it has issued in a decade, the US Supreme Court, in Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, case number


The US Department of Justice seeks to intervene in the Washington REDSKINS’ trademark suit to defend the constitutionality of the Lanham Act
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 13 2015

The Washington Redskins professional football team will soon not only be battling Native Americans over the registrability of the REDSKINS trademark


Top ten reasons why US trademark searches are important to every business
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 7 2015

As we ring in the new year, we thought we would remind everyone why the importance of a comprehensive trademark search for a new company name and for


The US Trademark Office rings in the new year with some reduced fees!
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 7 2015

It is not only the price of oil and gas that is dropping! The US Trademark Office has reduced the filing fees for new trademark applications and for


Trademark licensees may be protected in a licensor’s bankruptcy even after a “free and clear” sale
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 19 2014

The Bankruptcy Code generally permits intellectual property licensees to continue using licensed property despite a licensor's bankruptcy filing