We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 17,754

Would you like rights with that? The real reason behind In-N-Out’s periodic pop-ups?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • January 20 2017

In-N-Out has again given bloggers and Instagrammers heart palpitations by opening a pop-up restaurant in Sydney for ONE DAY ONLY, leaving burger


SAIC's 2017 Revisions to Trademark Examination Criteria To Further Protect Prior Rights and to Curb Malicious Trademark Squatting
  • LexField Law Offices
  • China
  • January 20 2017

The State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) revised its Trademark Examination and Adjudication Criteria ("the Criteria") on January 4


Treasury Wine Estates Wins China Legal Battle - Counterfeiters Left Whining Over Loss
  • Wrays
  • China
  • January 20 2017

Treasury Wine Estates (TWE) recently announced that it has succeeded in recovering its right to ownership of the trade mark ‘Ben Fu’ in China. ‘Ben


Hazy Future for Federal Registration of Marijuana Marks
  • Dykema Gossett PLLC
  • USA
  • January 19 2017

By now you may have heard that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office will refuse registration of any trademark application that identifies marijuana or


Is trouble brewing for craft beer brands?
  • Gill Jennings & Every LLP
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • January 19 2017

Craft beer is, quite frankly, booming. The last few years have seen a huge rise in the number of breweries on both sides of the Atlantic - over 24


Fame of adidas 3-Stripes Mark Yields Section 2(d) Summary Judgment
  • Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
  • USA
  • January 19 2017

That Board entered judgment summarily in this opposition to registration of the mark shown below left, for "Athletic footwear; Bowling shoes


Update to Lanham Act Gets Facelift
  • Fay Sharpe LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2017

On the morning of January 18, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Lee v. Tam. As a quick recap, this case stems from In re Tam, which


Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Lee v. Tam
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • January 19 2017

On January 18, 2017, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Michelle K. Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v


Circuit Split Remains: SCOTUS Passes on Defining Nominative Fair Use
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2017

In a recent disappointment to those advocating clarity for the muddy waters of determining permissible use of third-party trademarks under the


Trade mark opposition: Implications of adopting a mark containing descriptive words of foreign origin
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • January 18 2017

A recent opposition looked at the importance of the word SAKE as an English word of foreign origin. In dismissing the opposition, the Hearing Officer