We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,739

Federal Circuit patent bulletin: Starhome GmbH v. AT&T Mobility LLC
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

"A construction that excludes a preferred embodiment 'is rarely, if ever, correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support.'" On


McCaskill introduces patent demand letter bill
  • Woods Rogers plc
  • USA
  • February 28 2014

On February 27, 2014 - as patent reform bills make their way through Congress - Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced S. 2049, a bill


Ultramercial v. Hulu: Federal Circuit affirms district court’s dismissal of patent lawsuit for a patent claiming an abstract idea
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which outlines the steps for determining whether a patent claiming


Three rounds to knock out Ultramercial's patent on advertising as currency
  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

After sparring three separate rounds at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a panel opinion authored by Judge Lourie, the Federal


Third time is the charm for WildTangent challenge of patent eligibility of Ultramercial patent
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2014

In its third opinion reviewing the same district court decision, the Federal Circuit this time affirmed the district court's grant of WildTangent's


How long does the obligation to pay royalties continue?
  • Walker Morris LLP
  • USA
  • August 10 2015

Since 1964 it has been settled law in the United States that a US patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of their invention after the


Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment - the Supreme Court tells patent licensors to get creative
  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

In 1964, the Supreme Court decided Brulotte v. Thys and held that a patent owner cannot charge royalties for the use of a patented invention after the


An ongoing summer of sport impacted by inventions
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • February 10 2015

Australia is the place to be for major sporting events in the first three months of 2015, with the Australian Open Tennis and the Asian Cup Football


Communications and technology 2015 forecast
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • February 9 2015

Regulators and legislators focused on the communications and technology sectors have fertile ground for issues consideration in 2015. In this


Info-hold cases: de novo review where claim construction evidence is neither intrinsic nor extrinsic and expert damages testimony unnecessary for damages
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In two decisions involving the same plaintiff and patent but different defendants, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit appliedde novo