We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,918

Info-hold cases: de novo review where claim construction evidence is neither intrinsic nor extrinsic and expert damages testimony unnecessary for damages
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In two decisions involving the same plaintiff and patent but different defendants, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit appliedde novo

Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment - the Supreme Court tells patent licensors to get creative
  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

In 1964, the Supreme Court decided Brulotte v. Thys and held that a patent owner cannot charge royalties for the use of a patented invention after the

Supreme Court to revisit whether agreement to pay royalties after patent expiration is per se unlawful
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • December 15 2014

On December 12, 2014, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., to revisit and perhaps reconsider its prior

Patent litigation delays after the "Raging Bull" decision: how deep into IP law will the Supreme Court’s knockout punch to copyright laches resonate?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2015

"Laches is a clement doctrine," the Federal Circuit wrote more than 20 years ago. "It assures that old grievances will some day be laid to rest, that

The expanding breadth of patent ineligibility
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ultramercial's lawsuit, finally agreeing with the

How long does the obligation to pay royalties continue?
  • Walker Morris LLP
  • USA
  • August 10 2015

Since 1964 it has been settled law in the United States that a US patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of their invention after the

McCaskill introduces patent demand letter bill
  • Woods Rogers plc
  • USA
  • February 28 2014

On February 27, 2014 - as patent reform bills make their way through Congress - Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) introduced S. 2049, a bill

Leahy bill to reemerge shortly
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • March 17 2014

Senator Leahy will dust off his proposed bill S. 1720 entitled Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013 next week. The Bill has been the

Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2016

在McRO, Inc.诉 Bandai Namco Games America一案上诉编号2015-