We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,867

When copyrights and patents collide
  • Olivares
  • Mexico
  • November 21 2012

Let us begin with a few definitions

U.S. Patent No. 7,697,015: storage medium and game device storing image generating program
  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

The '015 patent attempts to fix a common problem experienced by most gamers. In past games when the camera is placed directly behind a character, the

Funkadelic master sound recordings can be involuntarily transferred to a court-appointed receiver to satisfy judgment
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing the issue of whether a lower court abused its discretion by appointing a receiver and authorizing the sale of master sound recordings to

The World Cup law
  • Veirano Advogados
  • Brazil
  • July 16 2014

At the beginning of June, a much-delayed bill was signed into law, the so-called World Cup law. Although the lack of restrictions on the sale of

Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reviewed whether a method of Internet advertising is patentable

Federal Circuit passes torch from juries to judges for willful infringement determinations
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2012

Just in time for the London 2012 Summer Olympics, the Federal Circuit, in Bard Peripheral Vascular v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., passes the torch from juries to judges on willful infringement determinations in patent litigation

En banc Federal Circuit addresses patent misuse
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, has determined that agreements between horizontal competitors to license potentially competing, patented technologies exclusively through a patent pool does not support a patent misuse defense

Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment - the Supreme Court tells patent licensors to get creative
  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • USA
  • July 21 2015

In 1964, the Supreme Court decided Brulotte v. Thys and held that a patent owner cannot charge royalties for the use of a patented invention after the

‘Last Week Tonight’ host John Oliver ignores the last three years of patent reform
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • May 1 2015

Have you seen John Oliver's piece about abuses in the patent system? If not, take a look here. The 'Last Week Tonight' host has quite a bit of fun at

  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2014

Federal CircuitはSUFFOLK Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc. (Appeal No. 13-1392) においてインターネット上のUsenetニュースグループへの投稿という形態の刊行物を根