We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,618

The expanding breadth of patent ineligibility
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ultramercial's lawsuit, finally agreeing with the


インターネット上のニュースグループへの投稿は刊行物に相当する
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2014

Federal CircuitはSUFFOLK Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc. (Appeal No. 13-1392) においてインターネット上のUsenetニュースグループへの投稿という形態の刊行物を根


Patent claims on media distribution over internet not patentable
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

In Ultramercial, Inc. V. HULU, LLC, Appeal No. 2010-1544, the Federal Circuit affirmed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) because a


Patent litigation delays after the "Raging Bull" decision: how deep into IP law will the Supreme Court’s knockout punch to copyright laches resonate?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2015

"Laches is a clement doctrine," the Federal Circuit wrote more than 20 years ago. "It assures that old grievances will some day be laid to rest, that


An ongoing summer of sport impacted by inventions
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • Australia
  • February 10 2015

Australia is the place to be for major sporting events in the first three months of 2015, with the Australian Open Tennis and the Asian Cup Football


Does ‘Raging Bull’ deliver knockout to patent laches defense?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

Under Federal Circuit case law, patent-infringement defendants may assert the laches defense an equitable defense barring claims brought after an


Communications and technology 2015 forecast
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • February 9 2015

Regulators and legislators focused on the communications and technology sectors have fertile ground for issues consideration in 2015. In this


審査官のクレーム解釈が不当と判断されたケース
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2015

Federal CircuitはIN RE IMES (Appeal No. 2014-1206) において最も広範な合理的解釈にはクレーム文言の文理解釈のみからは到達し得ないと判断し誤ったクレーム解釈に基づいたクレームの拒絶を覆した


Inventions that changed how we experience music
  • KASS International
  • Malaysia
  • April 20 2015

Imagine Darth Vader appearing onscreen without "The Imperial March" or Mario jumping around without his musical theme. Life would be a lot less


Google search practices mostly OK’d, but patent practices must change
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2013

The Federal Trade Commission announced that it found that Google did not violate anti-competition law by favoring its own products and services in some