We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,579

Supreme Court to revisit whether agreement to pay royalties after patent expiration is per se unlawful
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • December 15 2014

On December 12, 2014, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., to revisit and perhaps reconsider its prior


Patent claims on media distribution over internet not patentable
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

In Ultramercial, Inc. V. HULU, LLC, Appeal No. 2010-1544, the Federal Circuit affirmed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) because a


インターネット上のニュースグループへの投稿は刊行物に相当する
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2014

Federal CircuitはSUFFOLK Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc. (Appeal No. 13-1392) においてインターネット上のUsenetニュースグループへの投稿という形態の刊行物を根


The expanding breadth of patent ineligibility
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ultramercial's lawsuit, finally agreeing with the


MoFo Tech - FallWinter 2014
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • October 6 2014

Within a decade, analysts say, the "Internet of Things" will have transformed our lives. Billions of Internet-connected devices will monitor our


Ultramercial v. Hulu: Federal Circuit affirms district court’s dismissal of patent lawsuit for a patent claiming an abstract idea
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l, which outlines the steps for determining whether a patent claiming


Ready. Set. Go. FTC patent troll study cleared for takeoff
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2014

Last week, the White House's Office of Management and Budget approved the FTC's request to study how patent assertion entities (PAEs or, less


Dynamite attempts to enforce a feel-good gaming patent against Aruze
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • March 6 2013

In the recent case of Dynamite Games v Aruze Gaming & Ors, Justice Emmett of the Federal Court of Australia considered the validity and infringement


Google search practices mostly OK’d, but patent practices must change
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2013

The Federal Trade Commission announced that it found that Google did not violate anti-competition law by favoring its own products and services in some


EDTX excludes opinions on non-comparable licenses
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • May 28 2014

On May 9, 2014, Judge Davis of the Eastern District of Texas issued a Daubertopinion in Tracbeam, L.L.C. V. Google, Inc., Case No. 6:13-cv-00093-LED