We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,650

Senate judiciary to mark-up leahy patent reform bill
  • Woods Rogers plc
  • USA
  • March 25 2014

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin mark-up of S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013 at 10:00 a.m. on

Good technology: AirWatch's defamation claim in Georgia was compulsory counterclaim in California patent infringement action
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2013

On the surface this appears to be a fairly straightforward diversity removal of a superior court action to federal court based on full diversity

Dynamite attempts to enforce a feel-good gaming patent against Aruze
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • March 6 2013

In the recent case of Dynamite Games v Aruze Gaming & Ors, Justice Emmett of the Federal Court of Australia considered the validity and infringement

India: IP highlights 2013
  • RK Dewan & Co
  • India
  • January 10 2014

The International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization has on the recommendations of the PCT Committee for Technical Cooperation

Timely filing of patent applications: lessons learned from Michael Jackson and Smooth Criminal
  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2013

The U.S. Patent Act provides that an inventor is barred from obtaining patent rights for an invention, and the invention goes into the public domain

Australian pharmaceutical patents expiring January 2014
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • December 17 2013

Below is a report from IP Organisers (an independent service company of Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick) detailing Australian Pharmaceutical Patents

Covenants not to sue and implied “have made” rights; Global Communications v. DirecTV
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2014

On February 28, 2014, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida granted summary judgment to DirecTV, Inc. in Global Communications

Federal Circuit’s post-Alice eligibility analysis of business methods
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • November 16 2014

The Federal Circuit in Ultramercial, Inc. v. WildTangent, Inc., held that an "entrepreneurial" multi-step process for distributing copyrighted media

Have your say on the Bolar exemption from infringement
  • Dehns
  • United Kingdom, USA
  • February 7 2014

As we recently reported here, a referral has been made to the Court of Justice of the EU regarding the scope of the Bolar provisions. The case has

IP protection for sports apparel in the US
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2015

For some time now, sports apparel as a category has been outpacing the growth of the overall retail industry. Market research company NPD Group