We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,506

Recommendation to grant summary judgment in favor of Fox and other studio defendants where studios were selling products that incorporated a process from a domestic manufacturer
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2012

Patent Harbor filed a patent infringement action against Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment ("Fox") and other studios, such as The Weinstein Company LLC, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Home Box Office, Inc., and Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc. (collectively the "Studio Defendants"

Facebook's patent acquisitions? They're more about Google than Yahoo
  • Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP
  • USA
  • September 5 2012

In the past few months, Facebook’s patent portfolio has grown exponentially as a result of acquisitions of patent portfolios from IBM and Microsoft

ALJ Bullock issues notice of initial determination in Certain Video Game Systems (337-TA-770)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • September 4 2012

On August 31, 2012, Chief ALJ Charles E.Bullock issued a notice regarding the Initial Determination on Violation (“ID”) in Certain Video Game Systems and Wireless Controllers and Components Thereof (337-TA-770

Commission affirms no violation finding as to four patents and remands to ALJ with respect to one patent in Inv. No. 337-TA-745
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 1 2012

On August 24, 2012, the Commission issued a Notice of its decision to affirm the ALJ’s finding of no violation as to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,636,223 and 6,272,333 patents and to reverse the finding of violation as to U.S. Patent No. 6,246,697 in Inv. No. 337-TA-745, Certain Wireless Communication Devices, Portable Music and Data Processing Devices, Computers and Components Thereof, involving Complainant Motorola Mobility and Respondent Apple

Betting on the NFL goes on trial (Part 3)
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

To understand why the NFL will be irreparably harmed if Governor Chris Christie’s play to establish legal sports betting in New Jersey is successful, it helps to look at the traditional difference between betting on horse racing and betting on other sports such as NFL football

The Twitter IPA: what does defensive really mean?
  • Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP
  • USA
  • September 5 2012

Twitter is an innovative company, and today’s introduction of the Innovator’s Patent Agreement shows that their legal department can be innovative too

Patent infringement issues affecting media companies
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

Like many U.S. newspapers and television stations, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution has a website that covers local entertainment and events, which it calls accessAtlanta.com

Oppa lawyer style: protecting IP rights in a viral video
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • South Korea
  • October 1 2012

The creators of ‘Gangnam Style’, the K-Pop video by Korean rapper PSY, which went viral after being released in July, are reportedly facing a trade mark fight in the Korean Intellectual Property Office over rights to the commercial use of the name ‘Gangnam Style’

Verizon to pay $250 million to settle TiVo patent claims
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • September 28 2012

Digital video recorder (DVR) pioneer TiVo scored another key victory in its quest to protect its patents as Verizon Communications agreed to pay $250.4 million to settle claims that Verizon had infringed upon TiVo’s DVR “time warp” technology

Doing business in Canada
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • September 17 2012

Unlike the United States, Canada was not created by a unilateral declaration of independence from the colonial occupation of England