We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,101

The Abstract Swing: Major League Problems In Patent Law
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2017

Professional baseball was in a crisis, at least through the eyes of the major market teams. It all started with a rather unremarkable second baseman

Federal Circuit affirms Commission determination that litigation activities unrelated to licensing do not satisfy domestic industry
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2013

On May 13, 2013, the Federal Circuit affirmed a January 2012 Commission determination that Motiva LLC failed to prove a domestic industry existed or

Senate judiciary to mark-up leahy patent reform bill
  • Woods Rogers plc
  • USA
  • March 25 2014

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin mark-up of S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013 at 10:00 a.m. on

  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • November 1 2016

在McRO, Inc.诉 Bandai Namco Games America一案上诉编号2015-

AIA did not constitute a pardon for past false-marking acts
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed claims that the America Invents Act (AIA), which made significant changes to the false-marking

Third time is the charm for WildTangent challenge of patent eligibility of Ultramercial patent
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2014

In its third opinion reviewing the same district court decision, the Federal Circuit this time affirmed the district court's grant of WildTangent's

The European software patent controversy: Court of Appeal sides with the European Patent Office
  • NautaDutilh
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • June 28 2013

The RoviGemstar companies are engaged in a pan-European effort to enforce a patent portfolio relating to electronic television programming guides. In

Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and

Supreme Court rules Raging Bull claims not down for the count a follow-up post
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • May 20 2014

As mentioned in our blog yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Petrella v. MGM. The case raised the issue of whether the equitable

Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • USA
  • June 21 2013

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reviewed whether a method of Internet advertising is patentable